MN Police Shoot and Kill Daunte Wright

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not racial. It's simple. Follow police orders.

What if they told you to strip, need to search you for drugs? Weapons? If you don’t, going to jail. Follow those orders too?

If I was a known drug kingpin sure. It's to be expected. And please stop using these NEVER GONNA happen examples to prove a non point. If you have a point - just make it. Stop being dramatic.

You folks are so sheltered. You do know that poor, uneducated women get asked to this on the regular as to not get arrested for minor traffic or drug charges. Young teen females have been pulled over by police and told to do this. They don’t know the law, are afraid to go to jail so they comply. Then too embarrassed to file charges later. But hey follow police orders no matter what. They want Black people to be afraid of them and this a prime example.

I would honestly comply and then sue. Don't argue with the cops!

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying the cops are pulling poor black women over for minor traffic violations AND DEMAND THE WOMEN STRIP RIGHT THERE ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? Man, it's worth it to have some sort of video recording so that you can sue the PD from here to kingdom come, and to provide footage to the local news stations too. I hope I misread your comment, but suspect this is exactly what you're saying.

not PP, but it has happened

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/15/chicago-suit-hits-strip-searches-of-women-by-police/e3a90055-02ff-45c1-bec8-55320ef51802/

And worse

https://apnews.com/article/2b281a9914e14efb902d3469f6288320

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not racial. It's simple. Follow police orders.

What if they told you to strip, need to search you for drugs? Weapons? If you don’t, going to jail. Follow those orders too?

If I was a known drug kingpin sure. It's to be expected. And please stop using these NEVER GONNA happen examples to prove a non point. If you have a point - just make it. Stop being dramatic.

You folks are so sheltered. You do know that poor, uneducated women get asked to this on the regular as to not get arrested for minor traffic or drug charges. Young teen females have been pulled over by police and told to do this. They don’t know the law, are afraid to go to jail so they comply. Then too embarrassed to file charges later. But hey follow police orders no matter what. They want Black people to be afraid of them and this a prime example.

I would honestly comply and then sue. Don't argue with the cops!

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying the cops are pulling poor black women over for minor traffic violations AND DEMAND THE WOMEN STRIP RIGHT THERE ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? Man, it's worth it to have some sort of video recording so that you can sue the PD from here to kingdom come, and to provide footage to the local news stations too. I hope I misread your comment, but suspect this is exactly what you're saying.

Are you new to the planet? A few examples off the top of my head:

1) Daniel Holtzclaw - preyed on poor Black women until he stopped a nearly 60 year old woman, who was the director of a daycare center. He forced her to perform oral sex on him in his patrol car. Most of his victims were middle CJ aged Black women who had records.

2) Charmesia Corley was cavity searched on the side of the road after being pulled over for running a stop sign, when the police claimed they smelled marijuana.

3) The case in New York where the young lady was picked up with two male friends. The two officers let the male friends go and raped her while she was in custody. They claimed it was consensual. While she will not get justice, there is now a law in New York that says that officers cannot have consensus sex with detainees. I know Anna Chambers is not Black, but she was vulnerable).

PS - videos do not help. People want to see what happened before and after, remember?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wright was a very bad man.

The warrant was over unpaid fines for 2 minor misdemeanors — one a marijuana case — totaling $346. He pled guilty, filed for deferred payment and they were sent to collections.

We can't have individuals like this in our communities.

How many white people are being killed bc of weed?

I sure don't know. I also don't know how many black people are killed because of weed. The person in this story was NOT killed because of weed, so the number of people (of any race) that are "killed bc of weed" is irrelevant here.

[Anonymous]

Please explain how the shooting was not justified. Once the guy went back to get in the car, why isn’t use of lethal force reasonable. (I recognize she meant to use a taser, but even if she intended to use a gun, what’s the issue.). The guy could have been reaching for a gun. Has anyone seen the New Mexico video showing the officer getting gunned down?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

Or what about the Nashville cop getting shot by the woman who went back into her car, resisting arrest:

https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/maam-put-the-gun-down-video-shows-tennessee-cop-and-woman-shooting-each-other-as-she-tried-to-flee-stop/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please explain how the shooting was not justified. Once the guy went back to get in the car, why isn’t use of lethal force reasonable. (I recognize she meant to use a taser, but even if she intended to use a gun, what’s the issue.). The guy could have been reaching for a gun. Has anyone seen the New Mexico video showing the officer getting gunned down?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

Or what about the Nashville cop getting shot by the woman who went back into her car, resisting arrest:

https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/maam-put-the-gun-down-video-shows-tennessee-cop-and-woman-shooting-each-other-as-she-tried-to-flee-stop/

At some point, shouldn't not killing people be more important than taking people into custody? It's not like he was actively committing a crime at that moment. Maybe we need to err on the side of life, rather than shows of force.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please explain how the shooting was not justified. Once the guy went back to get in the car, why isn’t use of lethal force reasonable. (I recognize she meant to use a taser, but even if she intended to use a gun, what’s the issue.). The guy could have been reaching for a gun. Has anyone seen the New Mexico video showing the officer getting gunned down?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

Or what about the Nashville cop getting shot by the woman who went back into her car, resisting arrest:

https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/maam-put-the-gun-down-video-shows-tennessee-cop-and-woman-shooting-each-other-as-she-tried-to-flee-stop/

At some point, shouldn't not killing people be more important than taking people into custody? It's not like he was actively committing a crime at that moment. Maybe we need to err on the side of life, rather than shows of force.

At some point, will people ever learn to just listen to police?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please explain how the shooting was not justified. Once the guy went back to get in the car, why isn’t use of lethal force reasonable. (I recognize she meant to use a taser, but even if she intended to use a gun, what’s the issue.). The guy could have been reaching for a gun. Has anyone seen the New Mexico video showing the officer getting gunned down?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

Or what about the Nashville cop getting shot by the woman who went back into her car, resisting arrest:

https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/maam-put-the-gun-down-video-shows-tennessee-cop-and-woman-shooting-each-other-as-she-tried-to-flee-stop/

Every story about a bad cop has 1,000,000 of these behind it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please explain how the shooting was not justified. Once the guy went back to get in the car, why isn’t use of lethal force reasonable. (I recognize she meant to use a taser, but even if she intended to use a gun, what’s the issue.). The guy could have been reaching for a gun. Has anyone seen the New Mexico video showing the officer getting gunned down?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

Or what about the Nashville cop getting shot by the woman who went back into her car, resisting arrest:

https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/maam-put-the-gun-down-video-shows-tennessee-cop-and-woman-shooting-each-other-as-she-tried-to-flee-stop/

At some point, shouldn't not killing people be more important than taking people into custody? It's not like he was actively committing a crime at that moment. Maybe we need to err on the side of life, rather than shows of force.

You’re completely missing the point. He’s resisting arrest and he goes back into the car. How do the police know that he’s not reaching for a gun. Are they supposed to wait until they see his hands? Go watch those videos I linked to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not racial. It's simple. Follow police orders.

What if they told you to strip, need to search you for drugs? Weapons? If you don’t, going to jail. Follow those orders too?

If I was a known drug kingpin sure. It's to be expected. And please stop using these NEVER GONNA happen examples to prove a non point. If you have a point - just make it. Stop being dramatic.

You folks are so sheltered. You do know that poor, uneducated women get asked to this on the regular as to not get arrested for minor traffic or drug charges. Young teen females have been pulled over by police and told to do this. They don’t know the law, are afraid to go to jail so they comply. Then too embarrassed to file charges later. But hey follow police orders no matter what. They want Black people to be afraid of them and this a prime example.

I would honestly comply and then sue. Don't argue with the cops!

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying the cops are pulling poor black women over for minor traffic violations AND DEMAND THE WOMEN STRIP RIGHT THERE ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? Man, it's worth it to have some sort of video recording so that you can sue the PD from here to kingdom come, and to provide footage to the local news stations too. I hope I misread your comment, but suspect this is exactly what you're saying.

not PP, but it has happened

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/15/chicago-suit-hits-strip-searches-of-women-by-police/e3a90055-02ff-45c1-bec8-55320ef51802/

this is from 1979. 42 years ago. things have changed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please explain how the shooting was not justified. Once the guy went back to get in the car, why isn’t use of lethal force reasonable. (I recognize she meant to use a taser, but even if she intended to use a gun, what’s the issue.). The guy could have been reaching for a gun. Has anyone seen the New Mexico video showing the officer getting gunned down?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

Or what about the Nashville cop getting shot by the woman who went back into her car, resisting arrest:

https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/maam-put-the-gun-down-video-shows-tennessee-cop-and-woman-shooting-each-other-as-she-tried-to-flee-stop/

At some point, shouldn't not killing people be more important than taking people into custody? It's not like he was actively committing a crime at that moment. Maybe we need to err on the side of life, rather than shows of force.

You’re completely missing the point. He’s resisting arrest and he goes back into the car. How do the police know that he’s not reaching for a gun. Are they supposed to wait until they see his hands? Go watch those videos I linked to.

Yes. They are supposed to let him go. He is not a fleeing felon and he is not a danger to society.

That is what police policy states.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not racial. It's simple. Follow police orders.

What if they told you to strip, need to search you for drugs? Weapons? If you don’t, going to jail. Follow those orders too?

If I was a known drug kingpin sure. It's to be expected. And please stop using these NEVER GONNA happen examples to prove a non point. If you have a point - just make it. Stop being dramatic.

You folks are so sheltered. You do know that poor, uneducated women get asked to this on the regular as to not get arrested for minor traffic or drug charges. Young teen females have been pulled over by police and told to do this. They don’t know the law, are afraid to go to jail so they comply. Then too embarrassed to file charges later. But hey follow police orders no matter what. They want Black people to be afraid of them and this a prime example.

I would honestly comply and then sue. Don't argue with the cops!

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying the cops are pulling poor black women over for minor traffic violations AND DEMAND THE WOMEN STRIP RIGHT THERE ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? Man, it's worth it to have some sort of video recording so that you can sue the PD from here to kingdom come, and to provide footage to the local news stations too. I hope I misread your comment, but suspect this is exactly what you're saying.

not PP, but it has happened

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/15/chicago-suit-hits-strip-searches-of-women-by-police/e3a90055-02ff-45c1-bec8-55320ef51802/

this is from 1979. 42 years ago. things have changed.

Is this recent enough?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not racial. It's simple. Follow police orders.

What if they told you to strip, need to search you for drugs? Weapons? If you don’t, going to jail. Follow those orders too?

If I was a known drug kingpin sure. It's to be expected. And please stop using these NEVER GONNA happen examples to prove a non point. If you have a point - just make it. Stop being dramatic.

You folks are so sheltered. You do know that poor, uneducated women get asked to this on the regular as to not get arrested for minor traffic or drug charges. Young teen females have been pulled over by police and told to do this. They don’t know the law, are afraid to go to jail so they comply. Then too embarrassed to file charges later. But hey follow police orders no matter what. They want Black people to be afraid of them and this a prime example.

I would honestly comply and then sue. Don't argue with the cops!

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying the cops are pulling poor black women over for minor traffic violations AND DEMAND THE WOMEN STRIP RIGHT THERE ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? Man, it's worth it to have some sort of video recording so that you can sue the PD from here to kingdom come, and to provide footage to the local news stations too. I hope I misread your comment, but suspect this is exactly what you're saying.

not PP, but it has happened

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/15/chicago-suit-hits-strip-searches-of-women-by-police/e3a90055-02ff-45c1-bec8-55320ef51802/

this is from 1979. 42 years ago. things have changed.

Is this recent enough?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/officer-accused-of-raping-woman-at-maryland-police-station/2182571/%3famp

Link^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not racial. It's simple. Follow police orders.

What if they told you to strip, need to search you for drugs? Weapons? If you don’t, going to jail. Follow those orders too?

If I was a known drug kingpin sure. It's to be expected. And please stop using these NEVER GONNA happen examples to prove a non point. If you have a point - just make it. Stop being dramatic.

You folks are so sheltered. You do know that poor, uneducated women get asked to this on the regular as to not get arrested for minor traffic or drug charges. Young teen females have been pulled over by police and told to do this. They don’t know the law, are afraid to go to jail so they comply. Then too embarrassed to file charges later. But hey follow police orders no matter what. They want Black people to be afraid of them and this a prime example.

I would honestly comply and then sue. Don't argue with the cops!

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying the cops are pulling poor black women over for minor traffic violations AND DEMAND THE WOMEN STRIP RIGHT THERE ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? Man, it's worth it to have some sort of video recording so that you can sue the PD from here to kingdom come, and to provide footage to the local news stations too. I hope I misread your comment, but suspect this is exactly what you're saying.

not PP, but it has happened

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/15/chicago-suit-hits-strip-searches-of-women-by-police/e3a90055-02ff-45c1-bec8-55320ef51802/

this is from 1979. 42 years ago. things have changed.

And another one

https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/deputy-involved-in-dog-bite-arrest-ordered-strip-searches-on-women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not racial. It's simple. Follow police orders.

What if they told you to strip, need to search you for drugs? Weapons? If you don’t, going to jail. Follow those orders too?

If I was a known drug kingpin sure. It's to be expected. And please stop using these NEVER GONNA happen examples to prove a non point. If you have a point - just make it. Stop being dramatic.

You folks are so sheltered. You do know that poor, uneducated women get asked to this on the regular as to not get arrested for minor traffic or drug charges. Young teen females have been pulled over by police and told to do this. They don’t know the law, are afraid to go to jail so they comply. Then too embarrassed to file charges later. But hey follow police orders no matter what. They want Black people to be afraid of them and this a prime example.

I would honestly comply and then sue. Don't argue with the cops!

I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying the cops are pulling poor black women over for minor traffic violations AND DEMAND THE WOMEN STRIP RIGHT THERE ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD? Man, it's worth it to have some sort of video recording so that you can sue the PD from here to kingdom come, and to provide footage to the local news stations too. I hope I misread your comment, but suspect this is exactly what you're saying.

not PP, but it has happened

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/02/15/chicago-suit-hits-strip-searches-of-women-by-police/e3a90055-02ff-45c1-bec8-55320ef51802/

this is from 1979. 42 years ago. things have changed.

So you are going to just ignore the three stories I posted that made national news in the last 5 years? They were literally off the top of my head. This happens ALL of the time. 42 years after that article, it is STILL happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please explain how the shooting was not justified. Once the guy went back to get in the car, why isn’t use of lethal force reasonable. (I recognize she meant to use a taser, but even if she intended to use a gun, what’s the issue.). The guy could have been reaching for a gun. Has anyone seen the New Mexico video showing the officer getting gunned down?

https://nypost.com/2021/04/11/new-mexico-cop-darrian-jarrotts-shooting-death-during-traffic-stop-video/

Or what about the Nashville cop getting shot by the woman who went back into her car, resisting arrest:

https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/maam-put-the-gun-down-video-shows-tennessee-cop-and-woman-shooting-each-other-as-she-tried-to-flee-stop/

At some point, shouldn't not killing people be more important than taking people into custody? It's not like he was actively committing a crime at that moment. Maybe we need to err on the side of life, rather than shows of force.

You’re completely missing the point. He’s resisting arrest and he goes back into the car. How do the police know that he’s not reaching for a gun. Are they supposed to wait until they see his hands? Go watch those videos I linked to.

Yes. They are supposed to let him go. He is not a fleeing felon and he is not a danger to society.

That is what police policy states.

Nice spinning of the facts. You make it like he was running away and the police shot him in the back. Once he got into back into the car, he could have reached for a gun. Spare me your armchair quarterbacking. And please show me the police policy that says once a guy resists arrest and gets into his car, it’s policy to just let him go.