Their outcomes are not even close. |
Thought it was a 3.5. |
|
Here’s the thing.
Hopkins and Georgetown are ranked ahead of UVA in US news. UMD is ranked ahead of UVA in every difficult major, every world university ranking, dominates in research spending and has more national championships, Nobel/Emmy/academy award/Pulitzer/fields medal alumni than all Virginia schools put together. USNA is so much more important than UVA that it’s pitiful. The North side of the river is dominant in higher education. |
And this has to do with...? Certainly not the OP. |
This is how biased and ridiculous DCUM people are. Are you kidding? Duke is a borderline top 10, and when is the last time UVA cracked top 10? |
|
Georgetown is ranked 23. UVA is ranked 26. UMD is ranked 58. UVA's rank is the same as Carnegie Mellon's. UMD's is the same as Syracuse's. UVA"s reputation ranking by US News is 18th, tied with Notre Dame, Vanderbilt, Carnegie Mellon and Rice and ahead of Georgetown, UCLA and Wash U. UMD is 43rd in this ranking, tied with UC-Irvine and Case Western. Says it all. |
US News "says it all?" |
Yet it's in South Bend and Georgetown is in Georgetown. The academics are not going to be much different, let alone "much better" at Notre Dame. If anything Georgetown has always had a very rigorous curriculum in the humanities. |
Comparing Georgetown to NYU and USC now, they are not even the same type of schools in any way. Ranking higher is really irrelevant, and the ranking difference is minor to begin with. After the top 5 (Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, MIT) and the Ivies (just because lay prestige), the privates up until ~25 are very strong in certain areas and very weak in others. If anything, most people would consider Georgetown to be more rigorous than Vanderbilt, Emory, etc in the humanities. and certainly more prestigious. |
UMD is ranked in the 50's for world reputation rankings (both USNews and ARWU) while UVA is >100 for both (ranked "150-200" by ARWU). |
A school's reputation is the most important thing. |
Based entirely on research output. Has nothing to do with undergraduate reputation and little to do with US reputation. |
1. Research output is entirely why schools like MIT, Harvard, Caltech, Stanford et. al. and routinely considered among the best. To argue research has nothing to do with undergraduate reputation is utterly ignorant. 2. The USNews global rankings is based on world reputation, not research output. Meaning they surveyed academics from across the world. Which is much better than what the USNews Reputation Ranking does, surveying American high school counselors (lmao) |
| I got into Georgetown as an “unconnected nobody” (parents are UMC immigrants) - raised in CCMD and attended B-CC. There were lots of kids from this area in my graduating class, though many of them went to private schools. One of my roommates was from Silver Spring and went to Blair. I don’t think DMV area applicants had a disadvantage, but there just might be more of them since Georgetown is well known here. Of course, this was about 10 years ago, so things may have changed since then. |