Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if people on here have ANY idea what it is like to lose your house in order to pay expensive lawyers to defend you in a bogus, political prosecution? And, to threaten to prosecute your child, too?

Of course they don't. Some of the people posting are probably spouses of "BIG LAW" attorneys or "BIG LAW" attorneys themselves who employ the same tactics.
You've read it here - "It happens all the time!!!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if people on here have ANY idea what it is like to lose your house in order to pay expensive lawyers to defend you in a bogus, political prosecution? And, to threaten to prosecute your child, too?

You are defending a traitor who pled to a lesser charge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if people on here have ANY idea what it is like to lose your house in order to pay expensive lawyers to defend you in a bogus, political prosecution? And, to threaten to prosecute your child, too?

I would have thought of that before I became the U.S. National Security Advisor while still on the payroll for Turkey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if people on here have ANY idea what it is like to lose your house in order to pay expensive lawyers to defend you in a bogus, political prosecution? And, to threaten to prosecute your child, too?

Of course they don't. Some of the people posting are probably spouses of "BIG LAW" attorneys or "BIG LAW" attorneys themselves who employ the same tactics.
You've read it here - "It happens all the time!!!"

Ya, keep defending Flynn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if people on here have ANY idea what it is like to lose your house in order to pay expensive lawyers to defend you in a bogus, political prosecution? And, to threaten to prosecute your child, too?

I would have thought of that before I became the U.S. National Security Advisor while still on the payroll for Turkey.

Flynn is a kook. And his lawyer is a dummy.

Those who are defending him? I guess they're kooks and dummies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if people on here have ANY idea what it is like to lose your house in order to pay expensive lawyers to defend you in a bogus, political prosecution? And, to threaten to prosecute your child, too?

What about Flynn's prosecution was bogus? Besides his sentencing delays?

[Anonymous]

More

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

Seems we'll find out eventually.
And, recall that these are the attorneys that he is claiming provided ineffective counsel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

Yes it was disclosed and it’s been in the media forever that Flynn flipped because they were going after his son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

Yes it was disclosed and it’s been in the media forever that Flynn flipped because they were going after his son.

That's different. Even though he flipped, there is no evidence that he did it in exchange for not prosecuting his son. And, if that was the reason, it should have been in the plea agreement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

Seems we'll find out eventually.
And, recall that these are the attorneys that he is claiming provided ineffective counsel.

He's all over the place, claiming ineffective assistance and prosecutorial misconduct. And also his newfound innocence.

Such a nutty convicted criminal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

Yes it was disclosed and it’s been in the media forever that Flynn flipped because they were going after his son.

That's different. Even though he flipped, there is no evidence that he did it in exchange for not prosecuting his son. And, if that was the reason, it should have been in the plea agreement.

How has this been common knowledge for YEARS if they kept it secret?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

Yes it was disclosed and it’s been in the media forever that Flynn flipped because they were going after his son.

That's different. Even though he flipped, there is no evidence that he did it in exchange for not prosecuting his son. And, if that was the reason, it should have been in the plea agreement.

How has this been common knowledge for YEARS if they kept it secret?

That is a question for his attorneys and the prosecutor. It was not part of the plea agreement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Flynn's lawyers say that Mueller prosecutor Brandon Van Grack had a side deal with Flynn not to prosecute Flynn Jr.

I am not sure how that helps. It merely illustrates that Junior should have been prosecuted too.

Or, that they were threatening Flynn Sr. with going after his son, bankrupting him like they did to him, and intimidating him unless he entered a plea.
This is the MO of some of these sleazy prosecutors. And, it is what many have claimed all along.

I can't wait to see what happens here. If there was prosecutorial misconduct, they better be held to account.

If the prosecutor required it to be kept secret to avoid Giglio, that is a problem.

Why?

Any promises that would have been material to the plea agreement have to be made part of the agreement. If Flynn might be a witness in a case against someone else, that part of the agreement needs to be discoverable.

The question is, did his attorneys have an agreement with the prosecutor not to prosecute Jr., and was it disclosed?

Yes it was disclosed and it’s been in the media forever that Flynn flipped because they were going after his son.

That's different. Even though he flipped, there is no evidence that he did it in exchange for not prosecuting his son. And, if that was the reason, it should have been in the plea agreement.

How has this been common knowledge for YEARS if they kept it secret?

Exactly. It wasn't a secret.