| Decline politely with the excuse that travel/enjoyment will be hampered taking care of the little ones on such a long, time-change trip and DH will be able to focus and celebrate his brother better this way. When/if FIL offers to pay, thank him but suggest that he use that to help the happy couple instead. |
+1 |
+1. |
|
My husband went solo to his sisters wedding recently and you would not believe the blowback we got from his side of the family. Everyone was shocked that we wouldn’t drag our 1, 3, and 5 year old on a 24+ journey with a 10.5 hour time difference to attend this wedding because FAMILY.
Your situation isn’t as extreme but I definitely wouldn’t feel obligated to go. |
| Just send dh. |
np: I once had friends keep 2 kids overnight when they were young. No way would I have foisted 2 kids on them for the weekend. My parents have died and I don’t trust my in-laws with the kids alone for the weekend (they are a little crazy and not spry). Long story short, a lot of people can’t just go off and leave their kids. |
| If your fil offers to pay you should go. Inconvenience is not a reason to skip your husband's only sibling's wedding. |
An uncle they don’t know. Plus many people don’t want young kids at a wedding. |
1) I have a feeling OP is a big reason they don’t know him. 2) if that’s the case, the point is moot |
Where do you get that OP’s kids don’t know him from? She says they see him a few times a year. Not being able to afford it is a totally reasonable excuse; if your FIL offers to pay, you have to go. It’s that simple. |
| Team op - send dh, don’t go, and don’t go broke over this. |
This, providing that your husband is on board with this plan. Assuming your FIL offers to pay, your husband could tell him that your family is fine with just DH attending and it would be a hassle for OP and the kids to travel that far in such a short period of time plus OP would have to watch the kids solo while DH does wedding party stuff. So if FIL wants them there then they'll oblige but they don't owe FIL anything as it's a favor to FIL/BIL. Honestly it just makes more sense to me for OP's husband to go alone. |
+1 - if your FIL will help with the expenses you should go. It's your husband's only sibling and it's his first wedding. |
You have got to be kidding me with this. |
Ask your FIL for help with the cost. The other person you aren't factoring in is the bride, who is having the big deal wedding she has always wanted - maybe this marriage lasts 50 years or maybe it goes down in flames, but it sounds like the couple will be living in your town after the wedding. You may end up with nephews/nieces. Your kids may end up with cousins. Don't think of the wedding as some event. This is the start of a new familial relationship and I'd do everything I could to be supportive. You won't regret that no matter what happens in the future. |