"It's ok to be white" ... NO IT IS NOT

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

You are wrong. weakness will come from adhering too tightly to a cultural identity. Insularity is not possible for stability in the long term. Should be a balance.

Not so with the Jews. It is their strong identification that has enabled them to survive millennia of persecution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

That is an oft repeated falsehood and assumes that Hispanics aren't Caucasian.

BTW, the Hispanic population, while embracing their own ethnicity, relates far more to white culture rather than black. When they come to American it is to share in the American dream. Do you really think that means they see white people as the enemy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

You are wrong. weakness will come from adhering too tightly to a cultural identity. Insularity is not possible for stability in the long term. Should be a balance.

You are 100% wrong. We need a national identity and should require immigrants to ASSIMILATE. We cannot survive if we encourage and "celebrate" people maintaining their tribal battle-lines.

Don't fool yourself, the democrat party bosses don't give a damn about "equal rights." They care about maximizing racial strife in order to drive up black voting rates. If they actually created racial harmony, they would lose votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

You are wrong. weakness will come from adhering too tightly to a cultural identity. Insularity is not possible for stability in the long term. Should be a balance.

Not so with the Jews. It is their strong identification that has enabled them to survive millennia of persecution.

Not a great example, since they were nearly exterminated several times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.

It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.

Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.

None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!

I'm not talking about white supremacists. I'm talking about the new strain of republican "nationalists." Not the same thing as the KKK or neo nazis. I'm saying that whites are forming a mainstream political identity just like other races have. Do you take the position that ANY white political movement, analogous to what every other race has done, is automatically about "white supremacy"?

So being a Republican is only for White people? American pride is only for White people?

Well it seems now that the flag and national anthem are only associated with white people after all the NFL protests. Not a smart move.

Even after Trump, the republican party isn't "the white party", it just seems that way because the Dems have embraced identity politics, which makes the republicans "the white party" by default, however they don't really advocate white peoples interests. If they did they would be revoking birthright citizenship, ending family immigration, ending H1B visas, mandatory e-verify etc, all the stuff mainstream republicans and the chamber of commerce DON'T want to do.

More lies from Moscow an Fox news.

Liar liar pants on fire.

Trump doesn't talk about WHITE PEOPLE FIRST, he is a civic nationalist, not a WHITE nationalist. Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge difference.

Republicans don't do much of anything for white people, their donors like the status quo. The GOP will happily take white people's votes.

Please demonstrate why my opinion is wrong, snark is not an argument. Besides you sound like a John Bircher claiming "my russians are everywhere."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

You are wrong. weakness will come from adhering too tightly to a cultural identity. Insularity is not possible for stability in the long term. Should be a balance.

Not so with the Jews. It is their strong identification that has enabled them to survive millennia of persecution.

Not a great example, since they were nearly exterminated several times.

Indeed. And they have never been a powerful country in the last 2000 years. Their strong identification has enabled them to keep their culture/religion from going extinct, as have any number of cultures from around the world, but they have assimilated to whatever country they lived in. Most Jews in the US are quite assimilated. You only see a tiny percentage of them insulated here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

History shows any great power doesn't last long. It has nothing to do with multi-culturalism, and everything to do with the fact that great powers just die out because they become lax, while others continue to strive.

When people start agitating for x group first rather than the country as a whole it leads to breakup.

Look at Spain, Italy, and Scotland, all of which have groups or entire nations with separate identities (and in some cases languages) that agitate for independence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
White nationalism will continue to grow, so long as identity politics continues to be a dominant theme. Stoked by the left -- this was inevitable.

THIS IS A 4CHAN PRANK idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

You are wrong. weakness will come from adhering too tightly to a cultural identity. Insularity is not possible for stability in the long term. Should be a balance.

You are 100% wrong. We need a national identity and should require immigrants to ASSIMILATE. We cannot survive if we encourage and "celebrate" people maintaining their tribal battle-lines.

Don't fool yourself, the democrat party bosses don't give a damn about "equal rights." They care about maximizing racial strife in order to drive up black voting rates. If they actually created racial harmony, they would lose votes.

You are assuming that cultural identity is a tribal battle-line. My daily experiences as a white person do not match this.

I totally agree there should be more vetting and increased following up of those we allow to live here. No religious face-coverings in certain public places, yes that makes sense.

But "requiring assimilation" is vague and authoritarian. Siunds like they can come only if they look and vote White.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

History shows any great power doesn't last long. It has nothing to do with multi-culturalism, and everything to do with the fact that great powers just die out because they become lax, while others continue to strive.

When people start agitating for x group first rather than the country as a whole it leads to breakup.

Look at Spain, Italy, and Scotland, all of which have groups or entire nations with separate identities (and in some cases languages) that agitate for independence.

That means Trumpsters and Trumplandia will be the downfall of the US.

Last I checked, Scotland is still part of the UK. Catalonia is still part of Spain. Sure, there are those who want to secede, but it hasn't happened yet. Will it ever? Who knows. And last I checked, a part of the US wanted to secede too. It had nothing to do with "multi-culturalism" then.

And Italy? You are going to bring up the Roman Empire? You seriously cannot be comparing the Roman empire to the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

For the same reason Hillary Clinton ignored whites in the 2016 election. She used that DNC list as her outline to win through identity politics. Her only shift was away from African Americans (her revenge FU to Obama) in favor of Muslims.

Delusions are strong.

Yep, Hillary was deluding lots of folk until Donna Brazille's interesting tidbits.

[Anonymous]

"It's OK to be white" is no more offensive than "black is beautiful."

It may be trolling, but that does not make it untrue. If you think it's "hate speech," something is seriously wrong with you. If you are in academia and you are thinking about making a big stink about this, don't be surprised when it backfires, and you discover how much of a bubble you have been living in. I'm sure the trolls did this specifically because they knew that the holier than thou SJW types would take the bait and embarrass themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"It's OK to be white" is no more offensive than "black is beautiful."

It may be trolling, but that does not make it untrue. If you think it's "hate speech," something is seriously wrong with you. If you are in academia and you are thinking about making a big stink about this, don't be surprised when it backfires, and you discover how much of a bubble you have been living in. I'm sure the trolls did this specifically because they knew that the holier than thou SJW types would take the bait and embarrass themselves.

It's never not been okay to be white.

The same can not be sai for being black ( or any othe race in this country) Black people have been and still are called ugly and physically inferior an mocked for traditionally black features. Letting little black kids know that they are equally as beautiful i in no way racism.

Ther is a huge issue with equating whiteness to supremacy and racism which is what the it's okay to be white movement is about.

-white person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
White nationalism will continue to grow, so long as identity politics continues to be a dominant theme. Stoked by the left -- this was inevitable.

Yes. If only those minorities would shut up and know their place we'd be happy just like in the 40s and 50s.

“'I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either.''
- Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS) in 2002

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

History shows any great power doesn't last long. It has nothing to do with multi-culturalism, and everything to do with the fact that great powers just die out because they become lax, while others continue to strive.

When people start agitating for x group first rather than the country as a whole it leads to breakup.

Look at Spain, Italy, and Scotland, all of which have groups or entire nations with separate identities (and in some cases languages) that agitate for independence.

That means Trumpsters and Trumplandia will be the downfall of the US.

Last I checked, Scotland is still part of the UK. Catalonia is still part of Spain. Sure, there are those who want to secede, but it hasn't happened yet. Will it ever? Who knows. And last I checked, a part of the US wanted to secede too. It had nothing to do with "multi-culturalism" then.

And Italy? You are going to bring up the Roman Empire? You seriously cannot be comparing the Roman empire to the US.

You need a check up because your info is out of date.