"It's ok to be white" ... NO IT IS NOT

Anonymous
All lives matter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Racist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Racist.



See this is where you people are confused it's not racist to call out racist ideals.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.


That's obvious.

But what's worse - that someone is trying to make people feel that being white is not okay, or that people are actually buying it?

Because if you ask me, this campaign to stigmatize being white started with Trump's candidacy last year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Racist.


Hard not to talk about "white people" in a thread about white people.

No matter- an aggrieved white snowflake is gonna play the reverse racist card. Take that! LOL.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.


It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.


Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.


It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.


Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.


None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.


Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.


It's telling that you fear being a minority. If minorites are treated fairly in this country an the groups you listed are just being petty, you should have nothing to fear. You will now have the opportunity to show people the correct way to be a minority.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.



It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.


It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.


Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.


I'm pretty sure this is the message that Trump has been trying to send for quite a while. Remember when the Charleston thing died down and he decided to bring it up again - at a press conference about infrastructure - just to say there were "good people on all sides"?

It's a rather weird thing to complain about considering the most powerful group in America has been formed based on race:



The other two branches of power - mostly white people. The media - owned by white people. State governments and legislatures - yup.

What, exactly, do white people have to be afraid of - other than being propaganda-driven to do stupid things on behalf of a despot?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.


It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.


Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.


None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!


Sorry La Raza is a separatist movement, and in that, very much akin to Richard Spencer's Alt Right. Have some intellectual honesty.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.


It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.


Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.


None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!


Sorry La Raza is a separatist movement, and in that, very much akin to Richard Spencer's Alt Right. Have some intellectual honesty.


Here’s some honesty from a DP: white people have a lot of political and cultural power. The outcome of the last presidential elecrion was driven by white voters.

Why, at this time, would anyone want to stoke animosity for white people? Because - honestly - that’s what this looks like.

Since you’re obviously behind the effort, maybe you can share what the goal is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?


For the last 10 years or so.


Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.


Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.


Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.


I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: