"It's ok to be white" ... NO IT IS NOT

[Anonymous]

It's okay to be what you are. You can't control your birth origin but you can be the architect and general contractor of your life. No one, regardless of race, can control the conditions that surround them but they can control how they respond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.

It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.

Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.

None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!

I'm not talking about white supremacists. I'm talking about the new strain of republican "nationalists." Not the same thing as the KKK or neo nazis. I'm saying that whites are forming a mainstream political identity just like other races have. Do you take the position that ANY white political movement, analogous to what every other race has done, is automatically about "white supremacy"?

So being a Republican is only for White people? American pride is only for White people?

Well it seems now that the flag and national anthem are only associated with white people after all the NFL protests. Not a smart move.

Even after Trump, the republican party isn't "the white party", it just seems that way because the Dems have embraced identity politics, which makes the republicans "the white party" by default, however they don't really advocate white peoples interests. If they did they would be revoking birthright citizenship, ending family immigration, ending H1B visas, mandatory e-verify etc, all the stuff mainstream republicans and the chamber of commerce DON'T want to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.

It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.

Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.

None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!

I'm not talking about white supremacists. I'm talking about the new strain of republican "nationalists." Not the same thing as the KKK or neo nazis. I'm saying that whites are forming a mainstream political identity just like other races have. Do you take the position that ANY white political movement, analogous to what every other race has done, is automatically about "white supremacy"?

So being a Republican is only for White people? American pride is only for White people?

Well it seems now that the flag and national anthem are only associated with white people after all the NFL protests. Not a smart move.

Even after Trump, the republican party isn't "the white party", it just seems that way because the Dems have embraced identity politics, which makes the republicans "the white party" by default, however they don't really advocate white peoples interests. If they did they would be revoking birthright citizenship, ending family immigration, ending H1B visas, mandatory e-verify etc, all the stuff mainstream republicans and the chamber of commerce DON'T want to do.

More lies from Moscow an Fox news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

different poster, but why is that opinion incorrect?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

This is why some people say white people are clueless. Look at the list. These are all small groups and/or under represented groups in business as well as in government. DNC is trying to bring a voice to these under represented groups. White people as a whole are NOT under represented in either business or government. They are not excluding white people as a whole. They are represented in the bolded groups.

And white people are not "forbidden" to have an identity. It's not against the law to display your Irish/British/Italian flag. I've seen plenty of them waving around, displayed on cars, homes... whatever. What is frowned upon by most people is being part of a group that hates non white people and/or wants to kick them out/stop them from immigrating/cleave a part of the US for only white people (ie, white nationalists).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

The bold is correct the other groups you have mentioned seek equal rights. You and your "white rights" groups seek supremqcy which they have had and still largely do. The issues is thanks to minority groups taking a stand supremacy is cracking. People like yourself are having a hard time accepting this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

For the same reason Hillary Clinton ignored whites in the 2016 election. She used that DNC list as her outline to win through identity politics. Her only shift was away from African Americans (her revenge FU to Obama) in favor of Muslims.

Delusions are strong.

+1 Since when aren't white people not part of "rural Americans", "small business owners", "women", "veterans", "union members", "seniors and retirees", "young people"...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.

It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.

Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.

None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!

I'm not talking about white supremacists. I'm talking about the new strain of republican "nationalists." Not the same thing as the KKK or neo nazis. I'm saying that whites are forming a mainstream political identity just like other races have. Do you take the position that ANY white political movement, analogous to what every other race has done, is automatically about "white supremacy"?

So being a Republican is only for White people? American pride is only for White people?

Well it seems now that the flag and national anthem are only associated with white people after all the NFL protests. Not a smart move.

Even after Trump, the republican party isn't "the white party", it just seems that way because the Dems have embraced identity politics, which makes the republicans "the white party" by default, however they don't really advocate white peoples interests. If they did they would be revoking birthright citizenship, ending family immigration, ending H1B visas, mandatory e-verify etc, all the stuff mainstream republicans and the chamber of commerce DON'T want to do.

More lies from Moscow an Fox news.

"MOSSSCOW" he lisped!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

"Totally tribal" politics= women, minorities and LGBT struggling to keep basic human rights denied by the Original Tribe of Special American Snowflakes- White Christians.

This tribe does seem to be dying out. The kids just don't want to go to church. Nothing left of white American heritage except reenacting midnight lynching parties and BOGO torches I suppose.

Never give up the fight to end your oppression, O White Christians

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

History shows any great power doesn't last long. It has nothing to do with multi-culturalism, and everything to do with the fact that great powers just die out because they become lax, while others continue to strive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

You are wrong. weakness will come from adhering too tightly to a cultural identity. Insularity is not possible for stability in the long term. Should be a balance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

This is why some people say white people are clueless. Look at the list. These are all small groups and/or under represented groups in business as well as in government. DNC is trying to bring a voice to these under represented groups. White people as a whole are NOT under represented in either business or government. They are not excluding white people as a whole. They are represented in the bolded groups.

And white people are not "forbidden" to have an identity. It's not against the law to display your Irish/British/Italian flag. I've seen plenty of them waving around, displayed on cars, homes... whatever. What is frowned upon by most people is being part of a group that hates non white people and/or wants to kick them out/stop them from immigrating/cleave a part of the US for only white people (ie, white nationalists).

So whites are only allowed to celebrate their ethnicity but not their race? By this logic, shouldn't blacks be limited to celebrating their Congo/Chad/Nigerian ancestry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

Not true with the Jews. It is their strong identification that has enabled them to survive millennia of persecution.

You are wrong. weakness will come from adhering too tightly to a cultural identity. Insularity is not possible for stability in the long term. Should be a balance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

History shows any great power doesn't last long. It has nothing to do with multi-culturalism, and everything to do with the fact that great powers just die out because they become lax, while others continue to strive.

It's crazy to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's a source of tension and weakness. It's america's greatest flaw and why China will surpass us. For many years we successfully used the melting pot approach to accept immagrwnrs, but liberals now think that's racist and want to maximize and preserve racial tensions.