That was my thought, too. The fact that he tried to prevent his wife from hearing the interview with the police suggests that there's SOMETHING to hide. |
PP, here. I am a man. I don't see the point in being married to someone who cheats within one year (assuming he cheated) and is possibly a rapist on top of that -- especially if no kids are involved. |
There are many AA men nowadays who are scared enough of any interaction with the police. If OP's husband truly felt that he was not implicated or not guilty, he may have avoided talking to the police out of basic avoidance. If the police had the wrong contact information, he may not have known they were trying to reach him. For example, I have changed offices and phone numbers regularly in my work. At our work, every desk has a phone. If you are moved, you don't take your phone number with you, you change to the old phone number. Only a few people who have frequent contact with customers retain their number so that customers have a consistent number, but most people in our organization do not work directly with customers.
If OP is the type that will listen and will repeat and sometimes get the story wrong or embellish, etc, he may be trying to protect her by not telling her anything. First, in the event that he is a suspect, the less she knows, the less she can be charged with abetting the crime. For example, if it is decided that he was impeding the investigation or obstructing justice in any way, she can't be complicit in abetting him if she knows nothing about the incident. Additionally, he may want to avoid her being questioned and giving a different story than him. He may be trying to keep her in the dark so that she cannot say anything contradictory to what he says. I tend to agree that if he was guilty or event suspected that he was strongly suspected, he would have contacted a lawyer before the police came to collect a DNA sample. My guess is he knew something was happening, but thought that he was outside suspicion so he didn't get a lawyer. He didn't say anything to his wife because he didn't want her to be able to tell the police anything that might contradict anything he said (for whatever reason) or if she was the type to get stories wrong or even if she was the type to say something untrue if she thought she was protecting him, that he didn't want her to tell a different story or details. And he was going to wait until things blew over or he was beyond suspicion before he said anything to her. |
|
Has he given you reason to doubt him in the past? If not, why not assume he's innocent until proven guilty - or until at least the DNA results come back. |
Please tell me you are being sarcastic. PLEASE. FFS. |
Too many things are not adding up. If the police had been swapping others in the DH's work group, then they would have likely bagged them at work and got the DH at the same time. However, it took the police a week to find the DH even though they work at the same place. How far away are the offices from one another? Also, if there was a rape on company or goverment property, why would the company/agency let the people they knew were being investigated come back to work without them being questioned first? The DH asked the DW to close the open window after the cops started the questioning? The DH has the presence of mind to ask the cops to step outside so they can talk in front of an open window? More than that, the DH knew his wife was at the window or he would not have asked her to shut it. She just happened to be standing at the open window to hear part of the conversation, then gets seen by the DH, then told to shut the window? Nope. Too many things about this tale do not make sense. Unless we are watching it on Lifetime. |
Wow quite a few assumptions here. First, you don't know if he had sex with her at all yet you are already, based off an assumption calling him a rapist or adulterer and declaring the marriage is over. (it should be based on the OP assuming his guilt based on what isn't even an allegation at this point) Typical American woman, a hint of trouble bail and try to take as much as you can. |
So in your world, an allegation, which hasn't even been made yet constitutes dumping someone? You do know in cases where a victim doesn't know who the assailant was they will look at every person that could have been possibly been involve in order to try and identify a perpetrator. Meaning everyone at the location in this case. You should cut doen on the Lifetime movies a bit. |
|
Questions and a swab are not an investigation. |
If he is innocent and you have no kids, only married a year, he has no reason to stay with you now. Good you thing you are sure that he at least cheated and were planning on leaving anyway. |
Yes, tracking someone who has been accused of assault down to collect physical evidence and question them is an investigation. Possibly you're thinking of an indictment? |
There's no fake rape movement. There are, however, men who so hate women that they want to believe that women get some glory out of claiming they were raped. |
If my DH was accused I wouldn't believe it because I know him as well as I can know anyone. If you think it's within the realm of possibility that your DH is guilty then in your gut you must think he's capable. |