That's kind of a dumb way to look at it. Buy your kids what they want, or they will shoplift? Ridiculously entitled. It's not a natural consequence, it's a sign of a kid with issues. How about the kid instead decides to find a way to earn the money they need? That's what my friends did when I was a kid. (I just didn't care if we bought second-hand or off-label clothes.) |
| This is absurd, my middle school DD doesn't wear the brand labels and she is not bullied. She wears what she is comfortable wearing and could care less about the brand. The bullying is not going to be fixed by your DD wearing more expensive clothes, the bullies will just find something else to focus on. teach your daughter to stand up to the bullies and they will go away if they don't get the reaction they want. |
Same here. I can't even imagine that sort of thing happening at my DC's school. Is your DD at a public or private? |
|
Around that time my parents started giving me a clothing allowance - my mom gave me $80/month and was in charge of my own clothes. Maybe do something like that? Give her $100/month, and she can spend it on what she wants? That way if she wants something expensive, she can save up for it and forego other stuff.
Either way, I kind of doubt she is being bullied for not wearing brand-name clothes. If she is, I doubt it's really about the clothes. |
I used to be so jealous of my brother because he got all of the name brand items as hand-me-downs from our cousins, all of whom are male. I loved going to visit my aunt in CA each summer because she only had boys and wanted a daughter so badly that she spoiled me with pretty much whatever I wanted. It was the only time I got new, name brand clothes. I always made a promise to myself to save a few pieces for the first week of school. |
That's what we do, essentially. We don't physically give them the money, but we do seasonal shopping trips where they have a set amount to spend. Anything they want to purchase after that seasonal trip must be purchased with their own money. I don't include growth spurts or clothes for school functions in there. Those are things the kids really can't control, you know? |
I graduated high school in 2004 and we all carried Kate Spade bags starting in 1998, when I was 13/14. It was a BFD. We also exclusively wore Steve Madden shoes, Silver Jeans, Michael Stars shirts, A&F, Mavi, and a little later 7 For All Mankind... |
You sound insufferable. |
That's just the way junior high was where I grew up! I remember it mattering a lot to me then... I'm sure it matters even more to kids now with Instagram and Snapchat requiring them to further compare themselves to their peers. |
My parents didn't buy me clothes at all in high school. I got a job. It can go either way, I suppose. |
Me + 100. Where there's a will, there's a way. |
This. I'm suddenly very thankful that my kid is as clueless/oblivious about both what other people think of him and fashion as I am. |
|
i think the nice thing these days is athleisure - the nike/adidas/under armour/puma clothes last longer (it's all synthetic materials) over cottons/etc.
in the 90's and 2000's it wasn't cool to wear sporty clothes everywhere and all the time. now it is and it is actually cheaper just be decked out head to toe in adidas/nike. |
I have a boy so it is fun taking girls. I also do it to spite Mom as she hates me. Its my husband's friends. The youngest is particular about clothing so the parents give her a hard time. I love sending her with a suitcase full of clothing as she'll wear what I pick. This family could afford better but Mom loves thrifting, which is fine for some stuff but not the entire wardrobe, including shoes. I couldn't believe the sneakers she sent the girls in. If she's sticking me with the girls as a free babysitter for a few weeks, then I'm doing what ever I want (they gave up arguing).
|
I'm finding UA is cheaper than Nike and Adidas depending on where/when you buy. Our Nike isn't holding up that well. Adidas is mixed. Agree the synthetic is much better as the cotton wears too quickly. |