About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are at the point where believing Clinton is equally as unacceptable an alternative as Trump is is simply flying in the face of reality. When the guy in charge of investigating Clinton during Whitewater is coming out and endorsing her now over his own party's candidate because of her sound judgment (his words), you are exercising some serious powers of denial to throw in with Trump.

Good luck.

Who said anything about "throwing in with Trump"? He is as objectionable as Hillary but what I am not willing to do is hold my nose and vote for Hillary because she has been thrust on us.

I am hoping that millions of other voters - both Republican and Democrat - will take the same position.

No, I understand your position. You're refusing to vote for either of the two candidates who might actually win, choosing to see them as "equally unacceptable" and so risking with your protest vote that Trump might win. Despite the complete failure of judgment and temperament that you have seen from Trump over the last week, you think he's just as good as Clinton, and even though hundreds of security and policy and military experts have now crossed party lines to say they reject Trump and are voting for her, including the living Republican presidents. "Because she has been thrust on us" is your dumb reason, which fits right in line with Donald Trump's own childish, shortsighted, and narcissistic way of looking at things. Congratulations, nutjob, maybe you might as well just set the country on fire on your way to the polls, too.

My goodness, lady. Calm down. Dramatic much?

[Anonymous]

You seem to be confusing "Understandably pissed off" with drama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

lol!

same here!!!

+1

Jokes on you then. Gary Johnson doesn't believe in women's rights.

[Anonymous]

While decrying the treatment afforded women by one presidential candidate, the other, herself, vilifies the women with whom her husband was unfaithful.

[Anonymous]

Actually, no. Clinton may have been in favor of using the sexual histories of these women against them in the nineties, but there is no recent reporting that she has done this stuff recently. Certainly not as recently as two days ago when Donald Trump did it to Marcado.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html

The media has been protecting this woman her entire career. She is a first-rate liar. Lies about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary even though he climb Mt Everest 3 years after she was born. Lies about flying into an area where they took sniper fire even though video footage shows otherwise. Lies about youtube causing Benghazi. Claimed to not know the large letter "C" on internal documents meant classified.

Covers for her husband's abuse of women. Instead of divorcing Bill she destroys the women. Anything to further her career. Treats her subordinates terribly. Using her Secretary of State office and her Foundation to raise money for a campaign and fund her family's private jet lifestyle. Should be in a orange jumpsuit right now and not waddling around in her $10,000 custom made tents.

The media have covered for this women her entire career and now the house of cards is about to fall. She has no soul. She has no foundation. Her life is completely based on lies.

Yeah. Totally the not person I want leading my country.
God help us. The middle class can't afford 4 years after such a disasterous 8 years.

+1,000,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Ok.

Thought your post made sense til you said you were voting for a hippie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

Bill is basically weiner without the youth or sexting of today yet huma is leaving him. Hill needed bill well both needed each other to excel in politics

[Anonymous]

You vote for Hillary, or vote for Trump, and you are validating the horrendous outcome of this primary season. You are saying that it's okay for them to do it again. Voting for someone other than them sends a message to the parties. So, for all those of you who call it a wasted vote, you are wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You vote for Hillary, or vote for Trump, and you are validating the horrendous outcome of this primary season. You are saying that it's okay for them to do it again. Voting for someone other than them sends a message to the parties. So, for all those of you who call it a wasted vote, you are wrong.

Actually, you are wrong.

Your write in candidate cannot possibly win. Clinton or Trump will win. You are being truly irresponsible if you throw your vote away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html

The media has been protecting this woman her entire career. She is a first-rate liar. Lies about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary even though he climb Mt Everest 3 years after she was born. Lies about flying into an area where they took sniper fire even though video footage shows otherwise. Lies about youtube causing Benghazi. Claimed to not know the large letter "C" on internal documents meant classified.

Covers for her husband's abuse of women. Instead of divorcing Bill she destroys the women. Anything to further her career. Treats her subordinates terribly. Using her Secretary of State office and her Foundation to raise money for a campaign and fund her family's private jet lifestyle. Should be in a orange jumpsuit right now and not waddling around in her $10,000 custom made tents.

The media have covered for this women her entire career and now the house of cards is about to fall. She has no soul. She has no foundation. Her life is completely based on lies.

Yeah. Totally the not person I want leading my country.
God help us. The middle class can't afford 4 years after such a disasterous 8 years.

+1,000,000

hey, 1,000,000 Trumpster who never has anything to add other than the +1,000,000 - so deep and thoughtful.

I'll add mine -1,000,000 - 1,000,000 (HINT: that ends up being -1,000,000)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

Bill is basically weiner without the youth or sexting of today yet huma is leaving him. Hill needed bill well both needed each other to excel in politics

Exactly. They're all using each other. Then it backfires... again and again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You vote for Hillary, or vote for Trump, and you are validating the horrendous outcome of this primary season. You are saying that it's okay for them to do it again. Voting for someone other than them sends a message to the parties. So, for all those of you who call it a wasted vote, you are wrong.

Uh, why didn't you vote for someone different in the primaries and try to get your voice heard then? I did.

Playtime is over. It's either Grandma Nixon or Orange Voldemort. Personally, Grandma Nixon is the thinking choice here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You vote for Hillary, or vote for Trump, and you are validating the horrendous outcome of this primary season. You are saying that it's okay for them to do it again. Voting for someone other than them sends a message to the parties. So, for all those of you who call it a wasted vote, you are wrong.

Uh, why didn't you vote for someone different in the primaries and try to get your voice heard then? I did.

Playtime is over. It's either Grandma Nixon or Orange Voldemort. Personally, Grandma Nixon is the thinking choice here.

I voted for Bernie, and I'm going third party in November.

I didn't put either asshole up there to compete. So why should I give either asshole my vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You vote for Hillary, or vote for Trump, and you are validating the horrendous outcome of this primary season. You are saying that it's okay for them to do it again. Voting for someone other than them sends a message to the parties. So, for all those of you who call it a wasted vote, you are wrong.

Uh, why didn't you vote for someone different in the primaries and try to get your voice heard then? I did.

Playtime is over. It's either Grandma Nixon or Orange Voldemort. Personally, Grandma Nixon is the thinking choice here.

Yeah! Also, why not just write the DNC and RNC a strongly worded note about what you think of the choices and vote for the person you think has the judgment to make a better president (*cough* Clinton *cough*) instead of expecting them to divine your thoughts from a vote. Like, use your words and don't waste your vote. Just a thought.