About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.

Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?

wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world

I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business." makes me think they married a Bill, too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has no soul, and in fact, a egolomaniac narcissist; his foundation is a joke and a lie, and his life is based on scams and cheating. Tit for tat.

Agree. But nobody ever died because of Trump's actions. Not rewarding the Clinton crime family with another 4 years.

How are you going to judge what impact Trump's action had as a politician when he's never been one?

Many politicians have made decisions that have caused people to die, including Pence. Those are the kinds of hard decisions that politicians have to make, especially as Commander in Chief. If Trump becomes POTUS, he will undoubtedly have blood on his hands, too, simply by some of the decisions he must make.

I think Trump's environmental policies alone would indirectly kill people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.

Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?

wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world

I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business." makes me think they married a Bill, too

Actually, I can seem many dcum high powered attorneys staying in the marriage for outside appearances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

In the early 90s? Times were different then. I knew plenty of people who stayed in marriages that, to an outsider, looked to have excellent reason to leave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.

Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?

wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world

I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business." makes me think they married a Bill, too

Actually, I can seem many dcum high powered attorneys staying in the marriage for outside appearances.

When I was in Biglaw, I knew of partners who slept around and/or treated the staff inappropriately. Their wives either didn't know or, more likely, looked the other way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.

Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?

wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world

I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business." makes me think they married a Bill, too

Actually, I can seem many dcum high powered attorneys staying in the marriage for outside appearances.

When I was in Biglaw, I knew of partners who slept around and/or treated the staff inappropriately. Their wives either didn't know or, more likely, looked the other way.

Looking the other way is one thing. Proactively destroying the other women's life to bolster your hubby's career is a totally different story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

The majority of women would have dumped him.

I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.

Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?

wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world

I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business." makes me think they married a Bill, too

Actually, I can seem many dcum high powered attorneys staying in the marriage for outside appearances.

When I was in Biglaw, I knew of partners who slept around and/or treated the staff inappropriately. Their wives either didn't know or, more likely, looked the other way.

I've never been cheated on (knock wood), but I have friends who have and have stayed in the marriage. Not for appearances. For the family. It was hard for them, and the separated temporarily, but when you have that much history and a child, there are a lot of reasons to stay. People are complicated. I don't judge other peoples' marriages.

[Anonymous]

I don't care about their personal life. I don't care about any politician's personal lives, really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't care about their personal life. I don't care about any politician's personal lives, really.

Yeah. It's something to gossip about, just like talking about Melania's dress or Michelle's dress, but I really don't care about either their personal lives or their clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care about their personal life. I don't care about any politician's personal lives, really.

Yeah. It's something to gossip about, just like talking about Melania's dress or Michelle's dress, but I really don't care about either their personal lives or their clothes.

Yeah, who cares if Hillary worked to destroy the women Bill screwed? That's just personal life stuff! Very similar to fashion choices.

[Anonymous]

Most thinking women care less about a woman who stayed in a marriage with a cheating spouse whom she shares a child with, and care more about a philanderer who has 3 wives and a rack of kids by 3 different women who is also a sexist obese pig who comments on women's weight.

[Anonymous]

OP, your points are entirely valid ........ and I say this as someone who voted for Obama on both occasions.

You are being attacked and disparaged because you are not toeing the party line being espoused by liberals about Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

Are you now? Because the article does not have a comments section.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has no soul, and in fact, a egolomaniac narcissist; his foundation is a joke and a lie, and his life is based on scams and cheating. Tit for tat.

Agree. But nobody ever died because of Trump's actions. Not rewarding the Clinton crime family with another 4 years.

How are you going to judge what impact Trump's action had as a politician when he's never been one?

Many politicians have made decisions that have caused people to die, including Pence. Those are the kinds of hard decisions that politicians have to make, especially as Commander in Chief. If Trump becomes POTUS, he will undoubtedly have blood on his hands, too, simply by some of the decisions he must make.

I think Trump's environmental policies alone would indirectly kill people.

So someone killed Pence? huh - I wonder who Pence's replacement will be . . .

Yes, when Pence also voted for the Iraq war, he knew American lives would be lost. Trump himself said he didn't care that Pence voted for the war. Also, if Trump had been in congress then, instead of cavorting with beauty pageants and making comments about their breast size, he would've voted for the war, too.

Hillary voted for the war, too. She also knew lives would be lost.

Yes, I agree, but that's not the point. The point was that that PP thinks only HRC was the one who've made bad decisions that have lost lives. My point was, most politicians at some point do. Trump hasn't only because he's never been in that position. There's ample evidence to suggest he would make some pretty bad decisions that will lead to lost lives. His twittering thumbs alone could cause an international incident. Hindsight being 20/20, he's a bad Monday morning quarterbacker, who thinks he would make better decisions regarding foreign affairs, when clearly, he has no clue about foreign affairs.