About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]

[Anonymous]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html

The media has been protecting this woman her entire career. She is a first-rate liar. Lies about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary even though he climb Mt Everest 3 years after she was born. Lies about flying into an area where they took sniper fire even though video footage shows otherwise. Lies about youtube causing Benghazi. Claimed to not know the large letter "C" on internal documents meant classified.

Covers for her husband's abuse of women. Instead of divorcing Bill she destroys the women. Anything to further her career. Treats her subordinates terribly. Using her Secretary of State office and her Foundation to raise money for a campaign and fund her family's private jet lifestyle. Should be in a orange jumpsuit right now and not waddling around in her $10,000 custom made tents.

The media have covered for this women her entire career and now the house of cards is about to fall. She has no soul. She has no foundation. Her life is completely based on lies.

[Anonymous]

Trump has no soul, and in fact, a egolomaniac narcissist; his foundation is a joke and a lie, and his life is based on scams and cheating. Tit for tat.

[Anonymous]

Skipped your meds today, OP?

[Anonymous]

After the Republicans humiliated the president and this country by impeaching him because of an affair, I do not care at all about what Bill Clinton did, who he slept with, or how Hillary feels about it. I want the Republicans to never speak about Clinton and sex ever again.

When the Republicans (I was one then) impeached the president over an affair, I was mortified, humiliated, and furious. Now it's just old news.

[Anonymous]

I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump has no soul, and in fact, a egolomaniac narcissist; his foundation is a joke and a lie, and his life is based on scams and cheating. Tit for tat.

Agree. But nobody ever died because of Trump's actions. Not rewarding the Clinton crime family with another 4 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

lol!

same here!!!

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Would you like a cookie?

[Anonymous]

Mrs. Clinton’s level of involvement in that effort, as described in interviews, internal campaign records and archives, is still the subject of debate. By some accounts, she gave the green light and was a motivating force; by others, her support was no more than tacit assent.

So the campaign actively moved to discredit the women, which was SOP in the post-Hart days, sadly. Hillary believed her husband when he denied the accusations and consented to what the campaign was doing. Yes, it's an ugly story. Still not going to make us vote for that charlatan Trump.

[Anonymous]

I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mrs. Clinton’s level of involvement in that effort, as described in interviews, internal campaign records and archives, is still the subject of debate. By some accounts, she gave the green light and was a motivating force; by others, her support was no more than tacit assent.

So the campaign actively moved to discredit the women, which was SOP in the post-Hart days, sadly. Hillary believed her husband when he denied the accusations and consented to what the campaign was doing. Yes, it's an ugly story. Still not going to make us vote for that charlatan Trump.

Is it subject to debate that she took Air Force One to NYC in 1998 to tell Matt Lauer that all of the rumors of her husband's affairs were a conspiracy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Ok.

Your "OK" is pretty calm, PP. Based on others (And I'm in this camp- but as a former Dem) who are leaning 3rd party, the Libs accuse us of throwing our votes away toward Trump.

So be it, I say. I didn't put either one against the other. So the country gets what it gets. 

Hillary is a caged animal when it comes down to Bill. Had she left him, she would have maintained her integrity and carved her own path. She instead chose to make excuses for his affairs (and quite possibly rapes). In fact, the section where she claims his straying was rooted in his childhood is fucking brilliant, as she blames herself!

that he was under "great stress" to please both mother and grandmother who battled over him - And Hillary was not attentive to his needs!

What a con artist!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"

What feminists!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.

Would you like a cookie?

Would you like the definition of ad hominem attack? It grows your brain and not your hips.