Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You vote for Hillary, or vote for Trump, and you are validating the horrendous outcome of this primary season. You are saying that it's okay for them to do it again. Voting for someone other than them sends a message to the parties. So, for all those of you who call it a wasted vote, you are wrong.[/quote] Uh, why didn't you vote for someone different in the primaries and try to get your voice heard then? I did. Playtime is over. It's either Grandma Nixon or Orange Voldemort. Personally, Grandma Nixon is the thinking choice here.[/quote] Yeah! Also, why not just write the DNC and RNC a strongly worded note about what you think of the choices and vote for the person you think has the judgment to make a better president (*cough* Clinton *cough*) instead of expecting them to divine your thoughts from a vote. Like, use your words and don't waste your vote. Just a thought.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
