The game and Alpha/Beta

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My head spins reading this commentary. I'm an average to nice looking man depending on the day of the week. Have dated anywhere from 6's to knockouts and always surprised when the above average assume I won't call them for another date or think I am already involved with someone. Thought they have all the choices in the world.

But I have friends who date women who are objectively much better looking and no, they aren't wealthy. The key is they act like MEN. I don't care if you are an uberachiever career women or a barrister. A woman wants to feel the man she is with is strong and can protect her (e.g. Sandra Bullock and Jesse James). She wants to feel desired and special. She wants a guy who has a good sense of humor and can joke around. Sure, it helps not to look like a gargoyle, but you have to know how to make her happy.

LOL. I hope this post is a joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Game works precisely because it generates emotions in the target woman, just like it's generating among many women posters here. To get a woman you have to get their emotions inflamed. The very same women who claim to despise game are those most likely to be susceptible to it, because they are very easy to emotionally manipulate. A totally indifferent woman would be much harder to game because she doesn't become emotionally involved in the situation.

This is just the latest version of what has always worked and is common throughout literature.

Women can't resist strong dominating men, even though they claim to "hate" their domination, they become sexually aroused by it.

That's the whole point of game. It's to get beyond the intellectualized bullshit such as spouted on threads like this and get to the emotions of the woman. That's what "negging" really is all about. If she laughs fine, if she gets angry fine too. Her emotions are in play and once she becomes emotionally engaged she makes herself vulnerable to "game."

A neg isn't a sign of domination. It's the equivalent of stomping your feet and crying for attention. I found a dominant guy who didn't pull shit like that. He's hot, and not a douche.

"The game" is stupid. All games are stupid. You guys should just grow up already. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My head spins reading this commentary. I'm an average to nice looking man depending on the day of the week. Have dated anywhere from 6's to knockouts and always surprised when the above average assume I won't call them for another date or think I am already involved with someone. Thought they have all the choices in the world.

But I have friends who date women who are objectively much better looking and no, they aren't wealthy. The key is they act like MEN. I don't care if you are an uberachiever career women or a barrister. A woman wants to feel the man she is with is strong and can protect her (e.g. Sandra Bullock and Jesse James). She wants to feel desired and special. She wants a guy who has a good sense of humor and can joke around. Sure, it helps not to look like a gargoyle, but you have to know how to make her happy.

LOL. I hope this post is a joke.

What's not true?

[Anonymous]

Why develop a relationship based on so much work? If games are needed, they will be played throughout the marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My head spins reading this commentary. I'm an average to nice looking man depending on the day of the week. Have dated anywhere from 6's to knockouts and always surprised when the above average assume I won't call them for another date or think I am already involved with someone. Thought they have all the choices in the world.

But I have friends who date women who are objectively much better looking and no, they aren't wealthy. The key is they act like MEN. I don't care if you are an uberachiever career women or a barrister. A woman wants to feel the man she is with is strong and can protect her (e.g. Sandra Bullock and Jesse James). She wants to feel desired and special. She wants a guy who has a good sense of humor and can joke around. Sure, it helps not to look like a gargoyle, but you have to know how to make her happy.

LOL. I hope this post is a joke.

What's not true?

All of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Game works precisely because it generates emotions in the target woman, just like it's generating among many women posters here. To get a woman you have to get their emotions inflamed. The very same women who claim to despise game are those most likely to be susceptible to it, because they are very easy to emotionally manipulate. A totally indifferent woman would be much harder to game because she doesn't become emotionally involved in the situation.

This is just the latest version of what has always worked and is common throughout literature.

Women can't resist strong dominating men, even though they claim to "hate" their domination, they become sexually aroused by it.

That's the whole point of game. It's to get beyond the intellectualized bullshit such as spouted on threads like this and get to the emotions of the woman. That's what "negging" really is all about. If she laughs fine, if she gets angry fine too. Her emotions are in play and once she becomes emotionally engaged she makes herself vulnerable to "game."

A neg isn't a sign of domination. It's the equivalent of stomping your feet and crying for attention. I found a dominant guy who didn't pull shit like that. He's hot, and not a douche.

"The game" is stupid. All games are stupid. You guys should just grow up already. Seriously.

Yep. I remember when I met my ex, I was blown away by how upfront he was. Never had to play games cause he didnt need to. In fact, within like 5 minutes of meeting him, he jokingly told me was gay (but not in an offensive way).

It's funny, cause this dude was like the definition of "alpha" and I'm sure most of the guys that read that PUA bullshit would have been salivating over him. And he was the least domineering, most respectful, least "macho" guy I've ever met. He never had to put on an act.

The fact that you have to neg someone... dude, you've already lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My head spins reading this commentary. I'm an average to nice looking man depending on the day of the week. Have dated anywhere from 6's to knockouts and always surprised when the above average assume I won't call them for another date or think I am already involved with someone. Thought they have all the choices in the world.

But I have friends who date women who are objectively much better looking and no, they aren't wealthy. The key is they act like MEN. I don't care if you are an uberachiever career women or a barrister. A woman wants to feel the man she is with is strong and can protect her (e.g. Sandra Bullock and Jesse James). She wants to feel desired and special. She wants a guy who has a good sense of humor and can joke around. Sure, it helps not to look like a gargoyle, but you have to know how to make her happy.

LOL. I hope this post is a joke.

What's not true?

All of it.

Dude was riding high for a while.

http://cdn-img.people.com/emstag/i/2010/news/100322/jesse-james-240.jpg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My head spins reading this commentary. I'm an average to nice looking man depending on the day of the week. Have dated anywhere from 6's to knockouts and always surprised when the above average assume I won't call them for another date or think I am already involved with someone. Thought they have all the choices in the world.

But I have friends who date women who are objectively much better looking and no, they aren't wealthy. The key is they act like MEN. I don't care if you are an uberachiever career women or a barrister. A woman wants to feel the man she is with is strong and can protect her (e.g. Sandra Bullock and Jesse James). She wants to feel desired and special. She wants a guy who has a good sense of humor and can joke around. Sure, it helps not to look like a gargoyle, but you have to know how to make her happy.

LOL. I hope this post is a joke.

What's not true?

All of it.

Dude was riding high for a while.

http://cdn-img.people.com/emstag/i/2010/news/100322/jesse-james-240.jpg

And? She eventually dumped him anyway. Is that the goal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Game works precisely because it generates emotions in the target woman, just like it's generating among many women posters here. To get a woman you have to get their emotions inflamed. The very same women who claim to despise game are those most likely to be susceptible to it, because they are very easy to emotionally manipulate. A totally indifferent woman would be much harder to game because she doesn't become emotionally involved in the situation.

This is just the latest version of what has always worked and is common throughout literature.

Women can't resist strong dominating men, even though they claim to "hate" their domination, they become sexually aroused by it.

That's the whole point of game. It's to get beyond the intellectualized bullshit such as spouted on threads like this and get to the emotions of the woman. That's what "negging" really is all about. If she laughs fine, if she gets angry fine too. Her emotions are in play and once she becomes emotionally engaged she makes herself vulnerable to "game."

Sounds like you've got some super special kung fu moves. I'm inflamed just listening to you.

Seriously, about 90% of the women I know met their husbands the old fashioned way: either in school or at work. I'd much rather have the opportunity to get to know a guy in that kind of a setting rather than to have some guy try to play mind games with me in order to get my attention. Huge ick factor.

[Anonymous]

Whatever happened to just being cool?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Game works precisely because it generates emotions in the target woman, just like it's generating among many women posters here. To get a woman you have to get their emotions inflamed. The very same women who claim to despise game are those most likely to be susceptible to it, because they are very easy to emotionally manipulate. A totally indifferent woman would be much harder to game because she doesn't become emotionally involved in the situation.

This is just the latest version of what has always worked and is common throughout literature.

Women can't resist strong dominating men, even though they claim to "hate" their domination, they become sexually aroused by it.

That's the whole point of game. It's to get beyond the intellectualized bullshit such as spouted on threads like this and get to the emotions of the woman. That's what "negging" really is all about. If she laughs fine, if she gets angry fine too. Her emotions are in play and once she becomes emotionally engaged she makes herself vulnerable to "game."

Sounds like you've got some super special kung fu moves. I'm inflamed just listening to you.

Seriously, about 90% of the women I know met their husbands the old fashioned way: either in school or at work. I'd much rather have the opportunity to get to know a guy in that kind of a setting rather than to have some guy try to play mind games with me in order to get my attention. Huge ick factor.

+1

[Anonymous]

I don't think the long term relationship problems matter much when it comes to "game." The goal is to have sex with women. We've learned from other threads that long term relationships are not conducive to frequent sex -- because, as one poster pointed out gleefully, women get bored of the same guy more easily than guys get bored.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the long term relationship problems matter much when it comes to "game." The goal is to have sex with women. We've learned from other threads that long term relationships are not conducive to frequent sex -- because, as one poster pointed out gleefully, women get bored of the same guy more easily than guys get bored.

Yeah, well, I hate to tell you, this shit doesnt work in the short term either. I was the one who posted about my ex earlier and he could get pussy whenever he wanted, pick up a girl in a night sort of thing. And he never tried to come off as "dominant"- he just had a good, confident personality. Add on top of that that he was hot, and you get lots of pussy.

It's really that simple. Looks matter, as does having a pleasant personality. "Game" helps with neither, and actually hurts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the long term relationship problems matter much when it comes to "game." The goal is to have sex with women. We've learned from other threads that long term relationships are not conducive to frequent sex -- because, as one poster pointed out gleefully, women get bored of the same guy more easily than guys get bored.

Yeah, well, I hate to tell you, this shit doesnt work in the short term either. I was the one who posted about my ex earlier and he could get pussy whenever he wanted, pick up a girl in a night sort of thing. And he never tried to come off as "dominant"- he just had a good, confident personality. Add on top of that that he was hot, and you get lots of pussy.

It's really that simple. Looks matter, as does having a pleasant personality. "Game" helps with neither, and actually hurts.

But he's your ex...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think the long term relationship problems matter much when it comes to "game." The goal is to have sex with women. We've learned from other threads that long term relationships are not conducive to frequent sex -- because, as one poster pointed out gleefully, women get bored of the same guy more easily than guys get bored.

Yeah, well, I hate to tell you, this shit doesnt work in the short term either. I was the one who posted about my ex earlier and he could get pussy whenever he wanted, pick up a girl in a night sort of thing. And he never tried to come off as "dominant"- he just had a good, confident personality. Add on top of that that he was hot, and you get lots of pussy.

It's really that simple. Looks matter, as does having a pleasant personality. "Game" helps with neither, and actually hurts.

But he's your ex...

And? Doesn't invalidate him.