Gabriella Giffords Assasinated...

[Anonymous]

pp is right there is no doubt about terrorist William Ayers political viewpoints, radical and deadly agenda, as well as his patronage of President Obama. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxoiZdBSi-g

[Anonymous]

Something I've learned in my time with crazy (really crazy) family and friend is that you can't apply reason to try to understand what was never reasonable in the first place.

If a man will shoot the president to try to impress an actress, then this guy could certainly have shot a congresswoman for an equally insane reason. It does not matter which way he leans. What has been said by Palin and Obama are not important. He would have found a reason, even if it was because his cat was telling him to do it.

And, seriously, you guys are getting all frothed up because you think politicians need to be nicer to one another? The irony is killing me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfEcZlO-APE&feature=related nuff said

Democrats should condemn Bill Ayers and join Republicans in their call for more nail-bomb control. Additionally Obama should put Bill Ayers in jail.

How is it that in the midst of a great tragedy, in which many people were killed, you feel the need to redirect discussion to a thing that happened forty years ago? You are sick in the head. I'd hate to see your MySpace page.

Forty years from now, would you want people to dismiss Loughner's act the same way you've referred to Bill Ayers' actions as "a thing that happened forty years ago?"

[Anonymous]

Whatever motivated him, I still think Palin should have used better language. She loves inciting and that's irresponsible considering the Tea Party whack jobs that follow her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's important for Conservatives to know their place in America. When liberals are terrorists like Bill Ayers and Bernandine Dorn and they aren't mentally ill but dedicated radical liberals.....they get to be friends of the President ,fundraisers and college professors. When crazy schitzo's go nuts and terrorize...any link to conservatives will be made and they are given the death penalty. When a play is performed about assassinating Bush in NY, it is called "art" and protected free speech with minimal press coverage. Thank God for the new media that keeps track of all the liberal hypocracy.

You've made some excellent points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfEcZlO-APE&feature=related nuff said

Democrats should condemn Bill Ayers and join Republicans in their call for more nail-bomb control. Additionally Obama should put Bill Ayers in jail.

How is it that in the midst of a great tragedy, in which many people were killed, you feel the need to redirect discussion to a thing that happened forty years ago? You are sick in the head. I'd hate to see your MySpace page.

Forty years from now, would you want people to dismiss Loughner's act the same way you've referred to Bill Ayers' actions as "a thing that happened forty years ago?"

You are the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers. If you have issues with the fact that he never went to trial, take it up with Nixon. That was his decision. I doubt he made it due to sentimental feelings for the guy's politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfEcZlO-APE&feature=related nuff said

Democrats should condemn Bill Ayers and join Republicans in their call for more nail-bomb control. Additionally Obama should put Bill Ayers in jail.

How is it that in the midst of a great tragedy, in which many people were killed, you feel the need to redirect discussion to a thing that happened forty years ago? You are sick in the head. I'd hate to see your MySpace page.

Forty years from now, would you want people to dismiss Loughner's act the same way you've referred to Bill Ayers' actions as "a thing that happened forty years ago?"

You are the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers. If you have issues with the fact that he never went to trial, take it up with Nixon. That was his decision. I doubt he made it due to sentimental feelings for the guy's politics.

You didn't answer the very straightforward question. And, no, I'm hardly the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfEcZlO-APE&feature=related nuff said

Democrats should condemn Bill Ayers and join Republicans in their call for more nail-bomb control. Additionally Obama should put Bill Ayers in jail.

How is it that in the midst of a great tragedy, in which many people were killed, you feel the need to redirect discussion to a thing that happened forty years ago? You are sick in the head. I'd hate to see your MySpace page.

Forty years from now, would you want people to dismiss Loughner's act the same way you've referred to Bill Ayers' actions as "a thing that happened forty years ago?"

You are the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers. If you have issues with the fact that he never went to trial, take it up with Nixon. That was his decision. I doubt he made it due to sentimental feelings for the guy's politics.

Gosh, looks as if others on this earth are talking about Bill Ayers.
http://www.federalwaynews.net/2011/01/06/front-page/update-controversial-ex-activist-professor-#

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:You didn't answer the very straightforward question. And, no, I'm hardly the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers.

I'm not the person to whom you are addressing the question, but I'll be happy to answer it. The Weather Underground in general, and Bill Ayers in particular, tried to avoid injuring anyone. Their targets were property, not people. While it is often said that the Weather Underground planted a bomb that killed a police officer, the crime was never solved and nobody was ever charged. Hence, it's not clear who is responsible for that attack.

Now, compare that to the attack on Giffords. The perpetrator is alleged to have walked up to her and fired point blank into her head. He then opened fire on others in the vicinity. That is a stark difference from the Weather Underground attacks. As such, no rational person would consider them to be equivalent.

Regardless of the ferocity of the attack in Arizona, I fully expect that in forty years it will not be referred to as a "thing". Rather, it will have been completely forgotten. Had it not been for Republican efforts to tarnish Obama via Ayers, few people today would even remember the Weather Underground.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You didn't answer the very straightforward question. And, no, I'm hardly the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers.

I'm not the person to whom you are addressing the question, but I'll be happy to answer it. The Weather Underground in general, and Bill Ayers in particular, tried to avoid injuring anyone. Their targets were property, not people. While it is often said that the Weather Underground planted a bomb that killed a police officer, the crime was never solved and nobody was ever charged. Hence, it's not clear who is responsible for that attack.

Now, compare that to the attack on Giffords. The perpetrator is alleged to have walked up to her and fired point blank into her head. He then opened fire on others in the vicinity. That is a stark difference from the Weather Underground attacks. As such, no rational person would consider them to be equivalent.

Regardless of the ferocity of the attack in Arizona, I fully expect that in forty years it will not be referred to as a "thing". Rather, it will have been completely forgotten. Had it not been for Republican efforts to tarnish Obama via Ayers, few people today would even remember the Weather Underground.

You are either very young, very liberal, or very naive. I'm not going to take the time to list all that he did here in this post, but you have vastlly understated his past. I am old enough to remember!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You didn't answer the very straightforward question. And, no, I'm hardly the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers.

I'm not the person to whom you are addressing the question, but I'll be happy to answer it. The Weather Underground in general, and Bill Ayers in particular, tried to avoid injuring anyone. Their targets were property, not people. While it is often said that the Weather Underground planted a bomb that killed a police officer, the crime was never solved and nobody was ever charged. Hence, it's not clear who is responsible for that attack.

Now, compare that to the attack on Giffords. The perpetrator is alleged to have walked up to her and fired point blank into her head. He then opened fire on others in the vicinity. That is a stark difference from the Weather Underground attacks. As such, no rational person would consider them to be equivalent.

Regardless of the ferocity of the attack in Arizona, I fully expect that in forty years it will not be referred to as a "thing". Rather, it will have been completely forgotten. Had it not been for Republican efforts to tarnish Obama via Ayers, few people today would even remember the Weather Underground.

You are either very young, very liberal, or very naive. I'm not going to take the time to list all that he did here in this post, but you have vastlly understated his past. I am old enough to remember!

No, you really do have to take the time to list it out. Jeff is right. The Weather Underground was accused of one murder, and we have yet to see evidence that substantiates it. I think you talk a lot about Ayers, but you don't really know much about them other than what you can google. If you have evidence to prove the case, lay it out. The victim was Brian McDonnell, of the SFPD. The case was reopened and investigated a second time in 1999, but they never made an indictment. Alright now show us what your elderly mind remembers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff that from what I have read so far, this shooter was unfortunately a mentally deranged person who did something deadly.

However, putting all the violent talk on the right wing is just wrong. It is has been by both sides:



Dems Also Use ‘Target Maps’ for Election Fundraising
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2010/04/01/another-media-double-standard-dems-also-used-target-map-elections#ixzz1AVKG2NqI

Vice President Biden Wants to Strangle Opponents
http://www.publiusforum.com/2010/10/07/vice-president-biden-wants-to-strangle-opponents/

Slate’s Anti-Wall Street Mob Populism: ‘We Should Go After Them with Pitchforks, Knives, Guns, Clubs…’
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2010/04/24/slate-s-anti-wall-street-mob-populism-we-should-go-after-them-pitchforks-#ixzz1AVKXQKft

Stephanie Miller Fantasizes Drunks With Baseball Bats Beating O’Reilly, Bec
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2010/07/23/stephanie-miller-fantasizes-drunks-baseball-beating-oreilly-beck-g#ixzz1AVKkA3v7

Rep Weiner advocates puching Bill O’Reilly in the nose
http://thehill.com/blogs/twitter-room/other-news/92267-weiner-i-follow-twitter-for-the-tea-party-and-just-show-up-to-f-with-them

Violent Liberal Hate Rhetoric: Fifteen Quotes
http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2010/03/30/violent_liberal_hate_rhetoric_fifteen_quotes

WaPo Civility: ‘Knock Every Racist and Homophobic Tooth Out of Their Cro-Magnon Heads’
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2010/03/24/wapo-civility-knock-every-racist-and-homophobic-tooth-out-their-cro-magn#ixzz1AVLvMhZB

Union memo hints at gov.’s [Christie’s] death
http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/09/union-memo-hints-at-gov-s-death/

Nobel Peace Prize winner wants to kill the President [Bush]?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDrliITbed4

Sandra Bernhardt warning Sarah Palin not to come to NYC or she would “gang raped by my big black brothers” (video completely scrubbed from You Tube) http://media.newsbusters.org/stories/sandra-bernhard-.



Not all are firearms related, but all have references to violence.

Good research. Liberal violent talk is chilling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You didn't answer the very straightforward question. And, no, I'm hardly the last one on earth talking about Bill Ayers.

I'm not the person to whom you are addressing the question, but I'll be happy to answer it. The Weather Underground in general, and Bill Ayers in particular, tried to avoid injuring anyone. Their targets were property, not people. While it is often said that the Weather Underground planted a bomb that killed a police officer, the crime was never solved and nobody was ever charged. Hence, it's not clear who is responsible for that attack.

Now, compare that to the attack on Giffords. The perpetrator is alleged to have walked up to her and fired point blank into her head. He then opened fire on others in the vicinity. That is a stark difference from the Weather Underground attacks. As such, no rational person would consider them to be equivalent.

Regardless of the ferocity of the attack in Arizona, I fully expect that in forty years it will not be referred to as a "thing". Rather, it will have been completely forgotten. Had it not been for Republican efforts to tarnish Obama via Ayers, few people today would even remember the Weather Underground.

You are either very young, very liberal, or very naive. I'm not going to take the time to list all that he did here in this post, but you have vastlly understated his past. I am old enough to remember!

I'm old enough to remember that Democratic politicians weren't calling on liberals to "reload" or putting crosshairs over the pictures of Republican politicians or bank officials. You can debate all you want about the extremists. The truth is the people in the mainstream weren't using the same kind of violent rhetoric that Palin and people like her are using now. That is highly irresponsible.

[Anonymous]

Bill Ayers attempted murder 4 nail bombs in a federal judges house while his family slept. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfEcZlO-APE&feature=related

[Anonymous]

Yeah, liberals are known for clinging to guns /sarcasm