|
OP, do you have any thoughts on the misuse of the Einstein visa?
OnlyFans models and social media influencers are claiming half of coveted US visas meant for movie stars https://nypost.com/2026/01/06/us-news/onlyfans-models-and-social-media-influencers-are-claiming-half-of-coveted-us-visas-meant-for-movie-stars/ |
are you the fake hiring manager above who claims you can't find american talent? Yet you cant tell me what roles you are hiring for and where you would, for example, try to look for AI engineers in the US. you're clearly operating in bad faith, and are very aware of the fixes that could work 1. simple and significant and fast tax credits for US technical hires. 2. tie federal money to US workforce requirements. 3. add some friction to offshore work- lower tax deductions, consider a flat extra tax, consider extra restrictions/regulations for data access, etc. there are plenty of policy ways to do this, but yet we do not. and i am not against all visas, but they need to be used discretely and with policy choices that reduce offshoring, and then we will see real improvement. |
This is very true. The same is happening in Atlanta suburbs, and it’s astonishing how quickly this has taken place. Entire new neighborhoods with $800k+ homes are being populated with Indian families, in areas they didn’t previously have a presence in. It’s the jobs. They are getting paid $$$$$$, and they hire each other. |
Sounds like you done bought the immigrant bridge, what a moron. |
First, you are talking to multiple people. That person is not me I don’t claim you can’t find people in the US. I am claiming that off shoring is cheaper and that for lower cost, you can find higher quality talent. I also claim that there is a scale issue in the US. Of course you can find individuals in the US - but can you find teams of high quality individuals at the scale you can find elsewhere? BTW, I do think AI is going to upset this balance v soon. Finally on the policy incentives, you have no idea what you are talking about. Corporations already pay v little tax on the US (thanks to Republican policies). The leverage is much less than you would think. Second, there is such a thing as the “source principle”. Multinationals pay taxes at the source. So if I hire a team in India, I have to deal with the Indian tax code and the US does not tax me on it. Countries where companies are HQ’d of course have taxation rights but everybody is us g complex territorial activities to mask this. It isn’t at all easy to discourage off shoring. And anyone who tells you otherwise (Dems for a long time) are lying or don’t understand the complexities. |
Sorry your kid got their CS degree at a grade-inflated degree-mill country club instead of an inexpensive school like the Indians did. Overpriced US schools aren't immigrants' fault. |
Foreign talent won WWII and put an Ameican man on the moon too. |
| I did the OPe of threads like this are also the ones bragging about their playing lacrosse and having sex instead of doing homework. |
By foreign talent, do you mean a handful of people or a million Indians with fake diplomas? The people you refer to you consisted of dozens of war criminals whose only alternative was to be hanged. In other words, they didn't need a visa and their skills were necessary to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. |
Actually, they kind of are. They are mostly run by immigrants, who don't transfer skills well. |
Not solely by itself. But, the armed forces didn't fire all their American troops and replace then with foreign talent. NASA did't fire all of its American astronauts and mission controllers and replace them with foreign talent. That is what we are talking about here. |
Or 911 terrorists. |
Untrue: Claims that America’s foundational technologies were "strictly due to foreign talent" don’t survive contact with the record. The integrated circuit (Kilby and Noyce), microprocessor (Hoff, Mazor, Faggin), ARPANET/internet (Cerf, Kahn, Roberts, Kleinrock), and personal computer (Roberts, Jobs, Wozniak, Estridge) were all developed primarily by American‑born engineers working in U.S. labs funded by U.S. industry and government. Yes, some foreign‑born contributors were part of the ecosystem, but the leadership, funding, and industrial capacity behind these breakthroughs were overwhelmingly domestic. The same is true for WWII and Apollo: a few high‑profile foreign scientists participated, but the Manhattan Project, U.S. wartime production, and the 400,000‑person Apollo workforce were dominated by American engineers, machinists, programmers, and technicians. Invoking those historical contributions to justify modern H‑1B and offshoring practices is a category error. Studies from the GAO and Economic Policy Institute show that today’s H‑1B system is used largely to secure cheaper, more easily controlled labor rather than to get better talent, or to fill genuine skill shortages, and offshoring persists because it cuts labor costs by 40–70 percent. None of this reflects a lack of American talent; it reflects corporate incentives to suppress wages and maximize margins. Historical immigrant contributions are real, but they don’t transform contemporary labor‑arbitrage strategies into national necessities. |
I was involved in engineering licensure and degree accreditation for a number of years and can tell you your perceptions are off base. Many of those Indian STEM degrees don't stack up - university programs in India are far more inconsistent than US STEM programs, which must meet ABET Accreditation standards. Quality of Indian degree programs varies wildly and many are basically just run like degree mills. Very few Indian programs can meet that same ABET standard (like some of the top tier IITs, IISc Bangalore, NIT Trichy, BITS Pilani - but the majority of other STEM programs in India do not), but they are trying to increase the number of schools that can meet US ABET standards. A 2023 study found that only 45% of Indian STEM graduates are employable. Many graduate lacking critical skills. |