The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think there's much claim from a legal side. These are photos she posted publicly online and sold. They are showing a "fair use" excerpt.

Whether it's an underhanded move is a different question.

I've seen her videos. She's pretty average.

WTF? She didn't post "publicly" or sell them publicly.

And she certainly didn't give the VA GOP consent to mail anything out.

She did post them publicly on a site where you could get access to them if you paid.

Fair use excerpt of information that was publicly posted does not require consent. Same reason you can post a short clip of a song or movie without getting a license.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think there's much claim from a legal side. These are photos she posted publicly online and sold. They are showing a "fair use" excerpt.

Whether it's an underhanded move is a different question.

I've seen her videos. She's pretty average.

WTF? She didn't post "publicly" or sell them publicly.

And she certainly didn't give the VA GOP consent to mail anything out.

She did post them publicly on a site where you could get access to them if you paid.

Fair use excerpt of information that was publicly posted does not require consent. Same reason you can post a short clip of a song or movie without getting a license.

She didn’t post anything where children could have easily accessed it.

Unlike this Republican mailer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think there's much claim from a legal side. These are photos she posted publicly online and sold. They are showing a "fair use" excerpt.

Whether it's an underhanded move is a different question.

I've seen her videos. She's pretty average.

WTF? She didn't post "publicly" or sell them publicly.

And she certainly didn't give the VA GOP consent to mail anything out.

She did post them publicly on a site where you could get access to them if you paid.

Fair use excerpt of information that was publicly posted does not require consent. Same reason you can post a short clip of a song or movie without getting a license.

She didn’t post anything where children could have easily accessed it.

Unlike this Republican mailer.

A sealed envelope sent to an adult, and with a warning on the outside, is not considered easily accessible to children.

[Anonymous]

Really no need for the local GOP to have done this. Everyone who'd be voting in that race surely knows by now this candidate was selling porn to random strangers of her having sex with her husband while mouthing off smutty remarks. She's clearly totally unfit for any public office, but they should not have stooped so low.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously the title of this thread is false information. Republican party mailed it out. Not Youngkin.

I guess they wanted to remind people of what type of person this lady is.

I think it was an extreme tactic but we all know political campaigning hits below the belt.

Republicans = trash

“Remind people of what type of person this lady is”. You just showed us what kind of swamp dwelling uneducated misogynist you are. FO!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously the title of this thread is false information. Republican party mailed it out. Not Youngkin.

I guess they wanted to remind people of what type of person this lady is.

I think it was an extreme tactic but we all know political campaigning hits below the belt.

Your last statement illustrates how the GOP has normalized this type of
repugnant campaigning. On top of just lying. They suck. They have ruined this country.

Op is a clueless woman hating repugnicant.

[Anonymous]

Not op. I typed pp for prior poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Really no need for the local GOP to have done this. Everyone who'd be voting in that race surely knows by now this candidate was selling porn to random strangers of her having sex with her husband while mouthing off smutty remarks. She's clearly totally unfit for any public office, but they should not have stooped so low.

A woman enjoying sex and even making $ off of it doesn’t mean she isn’t fit for office. Men have been rutting pigs forever but they still get elected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Folks should not use DP when typing about a porn star!!

She isn’t a porn star you fascist misogynist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we see the nude photos or do I need to take your word for it?

Click on the link

I didn't see any nude photos. Still waiting to see the nude photos that are claimed in the title.

Click on the link and go to the comments to see the exact flyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think there's much claim from a legal side. These are photos she posted publicly online and sold. They are showing a "fair use" excerpt.

Whether it's an underhanded move is a different question.

I've seen her videos. She's pretty average.

WTF? She didn't post "publicly" or sell them publicly.

And she certainly didn't give the VA GOP consent to mail anything out.

She did post them publicly on a site where you could get access to them if you paid.

Fair use excerpt of information that was publicly posted does not require consent. Same reason you can post a short clip of a song or movie without getting a license.

She didn’t post anything where children could have easily accessed it.

Unlike this Republican mailer.

A sealed envelope sent to an adult, and with a warning on the outside, is not considered easily accessible to children.

On what planet?

[Anonymous]

The republican party is Repugnant.

And, of course, sleazy. Sending revenge porn in the mail where a minor can open it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we see the nude photos or do I need to take your word for it?

Click on the link

I didn't see any nude photos. Still waiting to see the nude photos that are claimed in the title.

Click on the link and go to the comments to see the exact flyer.

I still don't see any nude photos. Where are the nude photos?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we see the nude photos or do I need to take your word for it?

Click on the link

I didn't see any nude photos. Still waiting to see the nude photos that are claimed in the title.

Click on the link and go to the comments to see the exact flyer.

I still don't see any nude photos. Where are the nude photos?

I didn’t get any nude photos in the mail either. WTF!?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think there's much claim from a legal side. These are photos she posted publicly online and sold. They are showing a "fair use" excerpt.

Whether it's an underhanded move is a different question.

I've seen her videos. She's pretty average.

WTF? She didn't post "publicly" or sell them publicly.

And she certainly didn't give the VA GOP consent to mail anything out.

She did post them publicly on a site where you could get access to them if you paid.

Fair use excerpt of information that was publicly posted does not require consent. Same reason you can post a short clip of a song or movie without getting a license.

She didn’t post anything where children could have easily accessed it.

Unlike this Republican mailer.

A sealed envelope sent to an adult, and with a warning on the outside, is not considered easily accessible to children.

Um, the warning on the outside is pretty much an open invitation to a teen that something damn good and juicy is inside.