The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will Republicans hold him accountable for revenge porn? No, they have no problem violating women in various ways.

Kinda sidestepping the fact that the Democratic candidate is a sleaze.

[Anonymous]

Are there actual nudes in there? Or are they censored screen shots like the ones that were circulated online? I think it's pretty gross to mail either, but there is a difference.

She needs to win though, because Youngkin and the Republicans are hyper focused on abortion.

[Anonymous]

Imagine being so ignorant to make this post.

OP youngkin doesn't run the Republican party of Virginia. Also f you can read your own picture it says: "NOT authorized by any candidate"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imagine being so ignorant to make this post.

OP youngkin doesn't run the Republican party of Virginia. Also f you can read your own picture it says: "NOT authorized by any candidate"

L Louise is also dumb to believe it, she obviously has a problem with reading comprehension

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think it’s fair to actual victims of revenge porn to call it that. If anything she markets her nudity (to subscribers only) and therefore should collect a fee from them for distributing it. Wouldn’t it be copyrighted by the website?

WTF? Republicans mass mailing nudes without her consent is certainly revenge porn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imagine being so ignorant to make this post.

OP youngkin doesn't run the Republican party of Virginia. Also f you can read your own picture it says: "NOT authorized by any candidate"

He is the de facto leader of the VA GOP. And possibly gearing up for a POTUS campaign. He owns it.

[jsteele]

For those of you doubting this story, here is Richmond Times-Dispatch's article about it:

https://richmond.com/news/state-regional/government-politics/republican-mailer-includes-explicit-material-about-susanna-gibson/article_d1e5aaa6-72a8-11ee-92c9-afa9a79d1c01.html

But, since the mailer was sent by "The Republican Party of Virginia" which does not formally seem to include Youngkin in its leadership, I am going to change the title of the original post.

[Anonymous]

I think Susanna Gibson is an idiot to think this would have not come out. She is a deeply flawed person and candidate. HOWEVER, sending nudes in a mailer is an extreme and desperate attempt to win this seat. I hope someone brings a lawsuit against the VA GOP. And if I were a Dem in that district I would vote for Gibson.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:For those of you doubting this story, here is Richmond Times-Dispatch's article about it:

https://richmond.com/news/state-regional/government-politics/republican-mailer-includes-explicit-material-about-susanna-gibson/article_d1e5aaa6-72a8-11ee-92c9-afa9a79d1c01.html

But, since the mailer was sent by "The Republican Party of Virginia" which does not formally seem to include Youngkin in its leadership, I am going to change the title of the original post.

Thank you. -OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously the title of this thread is false information. Republican party mailed it out. Not Youngkin.

I guess they wanted to remind people of what type of person this lady is.

I think it was an extreme tactic but we all know political campaigning hits below the belt.

Jeff fixed the title.
Good to see. I hope people will report lies in titles more often.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think it’s fair to actual victims of revenge porn to call it that. If anything she markets her nudity (to subscribers only) and therefore should collect a fee from them for distributing it. Wouldn’t it be copyrighted by the website?

WTF? Republicans mass mailing nudes without her consent is certainly revenge porn.

No, because the post title is a lie and the pictures they are sending are not nudes.

[Anonymous]

It's not nude photos, it's lewd language.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will Republicans hold him accountable for revenge porn? No, they have no problem violating women in various ways.

The Tweet appears to be a lie. No one has claimed to see nude pictures in the mailing. A cropped image that removes the nudity is not a nude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously the title of this thread is false information. Republican party mailed it out. Not Youngkin.

I guess they wanted to remind people of what type of person this lady is.

I think it was an extreme tactic but we all know political campaigning hits below the belt.

Jeff fixed the title.
Good to see. I hope people will report lies in titles more often.

I reported the title myself. :roll: -OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Republicans hold him accountable for revenge porn? No, they have no problem violating women in various ways.

The Tweet appears to be a lie. No one has claimed to see nude pictures in the mailing. A cropped image that removes the nudity is not a nude.

cropped nude is a nude