The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the mailer was despicable, but not because I'm worried about kids seeing explicit content in it.

It's more the idea of widely distributing content that was clearly intended for a specific audience in order to publicly slut-shame her. It has kind of a revenge-porn vibe to it, even if it wasn't actually explicit material. It was using her explicit material against her in a very public way. Not appropriate.

You aren't a slut when you do it for money. You're a prostitute.

Did you get as mad when Trump boinked Stormy Daniels then paid her hush money? Or Trump gets a pass?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who won?[/quote

Susanna took one for the team.


https://www.wric.com/news/politics/local-election-hq/republican-david-owen-defeats-democrat-susanna-gibson-in-virginia-house-of-delegates-race/

That’s a happy ending.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the mailer was despicable, but not because I'm worried about kids seeing explicit content in it.

It's more the idea of widely distributing content that was clearly intended for a specific audience in order to publicly slut-shame her. It has kind of a revenge-porn vibe to it, even if it wasn't actually explicit material. It was using her explicit material against her in a very public way. Not appropriate.

You aren't a slut when you do it for money. You're a prostitute.

Did you get as mad when Trump boinked Stormy Daniels then paid her hush money? Or Trump gets a pass?

Boys will be boys!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the mailer was despicable, but not because I'm worried about kids seeing explicit content in it.

It's more the idea of widely distributing content that was clearly intended for a specific audience in order to publicly slut-shame her. It has kind of a revenge-porn vibe to it, even if it wasn't actually explicit material. It was using her explicit material against her in a very public way. Not appropriate.

She is disgusting and so is her husband. If you consider that "slut shaming," then oh well.

And yet she only lost by <1000 votes. Guess a large number of voters thought her opponent was more disgusting.

It was a pretty big night for Democrats overall in Virginia, so she significantly underperformed her party ID.

Significantly? It’s a swing district and the gooch showed up in a big misogynistic way.

[Anonymous]

So did she win?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the mailer was despicable, but not because I'm worried about kids seeing explicit content in it.

It's more the idea of widely distributing content that was clearly intended for a specific audience in order to publicly slut-shame her. It has kind of a revenge-porn vibe to it, even if it wasn't actually explicit material. It was using her explicit material against her in a very public way. Not appropriate.

You aren't a slut when you do it for money. You're a prostitute.

Did you get as mad when Trump boinked Stormy Daniels then paid her hush money? Or Trump gets a pass?

But what about...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the mailer was despicable, but not because I'm worried about kids seeing explicit content in it.

It's more the idea of widely distributing content that was clearly intended for a specific audience in order to publicly slut-shame her. It has kind of a revenge-porn vibe to it, even if it wasn't actually explicit material. It was using her explicit material against her in a very public way. Not appropriate.

You aren't a slut when you do it for money. You're a prostitute.

Did you get as mad when Trump boinked Stormy Daniels then paid her hush money? Or Trump gets a pass?

But what about...

This entire thread is what about ism. This is the first post where you noticed it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the mailer was despicable, but not because I'm worried about kids seeing explicit content in it.

It's more the idea of widely distributing content that was clearly intended for a specific audience in order to publicly slut-shame her. It has kind of a revenge-porn vibe to it, even if it wasn't actually explicit material. It was using her explicit material against her in a very public way. Not appropriate.

You aren't a slut when you do it for money. You're a prostitute.

Did you get as mad when Trump boinked Stormy Daniels then paid her hush money? Or Trump gets a pass?

But what about...

This entire thread is what about ism. This is the first post where you noticed it?

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So did she win?

She's the champion of our hearts.

[Anonymous]

Virginia Republicans lost. Their gambits were a big fail.

How about stop being shitty people, Republicans?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Virginia Republicans lost. Their gambits were a big fail.

How about stop being shitty people, Republicans?

You first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Republicans hold him accountable for revenge porn? No, they have no problem violating women in various ways.

Voters didn't care about your lie. Oh, well.

Louise is a liar. Glad the voters saw through her nasty tactics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Virginia Republicans lost. Their gambits were a big fail.

How about stop being shitty people, Republicans?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are they going to move out of the area?

I would literally change my name after this and move across the country. Are they both VA natives?

+100
Unfortunately, she will never outrun this. Nor will her children or parents.

The sins of the father (or mother) are visited upon the son.

Backwards ignorant fool. The Rs would stone her publicly if they could get away with it. Admit it, you hate women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the mailer was despicable, but not because I'm worried about kids seeing explicit content in it.

It's more the idea of widely distributing content that was clearly intended for a specific audience in order to publicly slut-shame her. It has kind of a revenge-porn vibe to it, even if it wasn't actually explicit material. It was using her explicit material against her in a very public way. Not appropriate.

You aren't a slut when you do it for money. You're a prostitute.

Did you get as mad when Trump boinked Stormy Daniels then paid her hush money? Or Trump gets a pass?

No they don't. Men can be rutting pigs and they'll look away every time. All you right wing posters please explain Matt Gaetz.