The Republican Party of Virginia mails out nude photos of a candidate

[Anonymous]

Will Republicans hold him accountable for revenge porn? No, they have no problem violating women in various ways.

[Anonymous]

Anyone can print anything.

[Anonymous]

is this really revenge porn? or an issue with unpaid subscribers' issue?

[Anonymous]

How are they going to check ages of those who open the envelope the way they require for p*rn websites in Virginia?

[Anonymous]

Curious, for a mass mailer, if there is any screw up where a minor receives this addressed in their name, do parents have grounds to sue for distribution of pornographic materials for a minor? No doubt there will be some of that in a mass mailing. Teens may have catalogs, other subscriptions where their name could get pulled into this mass mailing.

[Anonymous]

So the family values party who is so concerned about porn in libraries is literally mailing out porn to VA voters?

[Anonymous]

Obviously the title of this thread is false information. Republican party mailed it out. Not Youngkin.

I guess they wanted to remind people of what type of person this lady is.

I think it was an extreme tactic but we all know political campaigning hits below the belt.

[Anonymous]

It's nice for the GOP to admit they are the party of porn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously the title of this thread is false information. Republican party mailed it out. Not Youngkin.

I guess they wanted to remind people of what type of person this lady is.

I think it was an extreme tactic but we all know political campaigning hits below the belt.

Who is the top GOP in the state of Virginia? That person is usually the titular head of the party.

[Anonymous]

Can we see the nude photos or do I need to take your word for it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So the family values party who is so concerned about porn in libraries is literally mailing out porn to VA voters?

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we see the nude photos or do I need to take your word for it?

Click on the link

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:is this really revenge porn? or an issue with unpaid subscribers' issue?

§ 18.2-386.2. Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another; penalty.
A. Any person who, with the intent to coerce, harass, or intimidate, maliciously disseminates or sells any videographic or still image

[Anonymous]

I don’t think it’s fair to actual victims of revenge porn to call it that. If anything she markets her nudity (to subscribers only) and therefore should collect a fee from them for distributing it. Wouldn’t it be copyrighted by the website?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously the title of this thread is false information. Republican party mailed it out. Not Youngkin.

I guess they wanted to remind people of what type of person this lady is.

I think it was an extreme tactic but we all know political campaigning hits below the belt.

Your last statement illustrates how the GOP has normalized this type of repugnant campaigning. On top of just lying. They suck. They have ruined this country.