Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post did not age well, lol.

A stroke, sometimes called a brain attack, occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts. In either case, parts of the brain become damaged or die. A stroke can cause lasting brain damage, long-term disability, or even death

Worse, the blood clot came from his heart. Good chance of death, further damage in the next 5 years

Hey ghouls, you also declared that Hillary Clinton was about to die in 2016!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is blaming Melania for him endorsing Oz.

Trump is a real piece of work. I hope the money is worth it for Melania.

Huh? Does Melania even know who Oz is? What a POS. Takes credit for wins and blames others for losses.

Actually, I heard this months ago. Apparently she has been a fan of Oz for years. But also Trump could kind of identify with him because they both had TV shows.

It’s funny because Oz’s primary opponent McCormick is married to former Trump staffer Dina Powell. They had been visiting Mar a Lago excessively to lobby Trump for his endorsement. McCormick might have had a better shot because he didn’t have the carpetbagger tag.

That's ridiculous. Until January 2022, McCormick was CEO of a hedge fund based in Connecticut. He was most definitely pegged as a CT carpetbagger. He was no more a resident than Oz was.

McCormick would have definitely been a harder opponent for Fetterman to beat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Just came on here to post this.

Seems elite Republican strategists / propagandists aren't actually very good at understanding regular folk.

Or more likely they're just good liars trying to make a lie believed by repeating it often enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post did not age well, lol.

A stroke, sometimes called a brain attack, occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts. In either case, parts of the brain become damaged or die. A stroke can cause lasting brain damage, long-term disability, or even death

Worse, the blood clot came from his heart. Good chance of death, further damage in the next 5 years

What do you base that on?

Most people with a-fib who have a stroke never have a second one, and if they do, it's usually within the first 3 months after the first. His stroke was in May.

This is what his own cardiologist says:

“The prognosis I can give for John’s heart is this: If he takes his medications, eats healthy and exercises, he’ll be fine,” Chandra wrote. “If he does what I’ve told him, and I do believe that he is taking his recovery and his health very seriously this time, he should be able to campaign and serve in the U.S. Senate without a problem.”

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/03/politics/john-fetterman-health/index.html

My father’s cardiologist. My dad’s stroke came from the carotid. They periodically clean out that artery. My mother’s recent minor stroke came from a widowmaker that should have killed her. Much more dangerous and much higher likelihood of a repeat.

Do you understand the difference between an atherosclerotic-plaque related clot and a stasis-related clot, and why medicated outcomes are different for each?

[Anonymous]

^^ 75% of people with strokes secondary to a-fib never have a second one. Of the 25% that do, most are in the three months immediately after the first stroke.

I don't think this is a useful line of attack for you to pursue.

[Anonymous]

As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

Do you also agree that Vance, Oz, and Walker are unqualified?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

I... did not see that twist ending coming.

As a moderate independent Black trans woman, I could never vote for another Democrat because

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

What's the standard for being minimally "qualified for the office?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

Was Trump qualified, O Wise One?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

How is someone who has actually served in public office in multiple roles not more qualified for office than someone who never has?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

How is someone who has actually served in public office in multiple roles not more qualified for office than someone who never has?

Yes, how does this work? What qualifications made Oz more qualified than Fetterman?

Being a presenter on a tv show?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

The voters of PA disagreed, so too bad. Get over it.

[Anonymous]

That was the weirdest take in a series of weird takes.

Oz more qualified than Fetterman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

How is someone who has actually served in public office in multiple roles not more qualified for office than someone who never has?

Yes, how does this work? What qualifications made Oz more qualified than Fetterman?

Being a presenter on a tv show?

Serving in the Turkish military?