Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one from Pennsylvania can vote for someone who doesn't even know the football schedule.

True for many in some areas. Fetterman was mayor of an old town that lost jobs, wears hoodie, PA regional accent, and chased a man running with his shotgun after he thought he heard gunshots. That guy turned out to be an innocent jogger who happened to be AA. Fetterman;
https://johnfetterman.com/issues/
"make more sh*t in America" which he has been advocating for years

Oz is flush with money and it's not like he used it to open businesses employing people in PA communities. Oz massive volume of money in the
SEC filing https://sec.report/Senate-Stock-Disclosures/Oz/Mehmet+C/e07e5827-852f-4e61-b1ad-aeb6536964b2 See all the DE based stuff where real decisions are not actually made in DE? Is this why real estate taxes are artificially low in DE?

DE is a bizarre tax shelter that in essence removes revenue from other states. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/092515/4-reasons-why-delaware-considered-tax-shelter.asp

The jogger he chased endorsed Fetterman.

He pulled a Dick Cheney. Remember when he shot his hunting buddy in the face and the hunting buddy apologized to him for being in the way? I have to learn how these guys hypnotize people and get them to be their minions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

Do you also agree that Vance, Oz, and Walker are unqualified?

Oz was a carpetbagger and a terrible campaigner but he was objectively intelligent. Walker is just as terrible as Fetterman. Other than his affinity for Trump I actually don’t have a problem with Vance. I place more import on competence and character than ideology and country over party. But I seem to be in a vanishing minority.

So setting up a nonprofit to combat the opioid crisis, which was really a front to promote himself, is your definition of competence and character?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As an independent in my fifties I’ve voted for democrats and republicans over the years but I’ve never cast a vote for a candidate that was objectively unqualified for office. You can dislike Oz but it’s laughable to pretend that Fetterman is qualified for the office.

Do you also agree that Vance, Oz, and Walker are unqualified?

Oz was a carpetbagger and a terrible campaigner but he was objectively intelligent. Walker is just as terrible as Fetterman. Other than his affinity for Trump I actually don’t have a problem with Vance. I place more import on competence and character than ideology and country over party. But I seem to be in a vanishing minority.

So setting up a nonprofit to combat the opioid crisis, which was really a front to promote himself, is your definition of competence and character?

What is the test that decides a persons true motives? Wouldn’t OZ have some suspicion of self promotion too? He’s a tv celebrity fer chrissakes!

[Anonymous]

So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

Sour grapes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

Cry harder, loser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

What? No one pities Fetterman. People love him because he seems like an actual person who cares about other people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

You people keep losing because you don’t understand what empathy is.

And also you make ads like this.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, that doesn't work in Pennsylvania, guys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

Cry harder, loser.

Ah, we’ve found the village idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

Cry harder, loser.

Ah, we’ve found the village idiot.

No seriously, you need to stfu. If your guy won, you’d be applauding the voters. Now you insult them bc you’re a pathetic loser.

Even if they did vote for him bc of EMPATHY, not pity, accept it. Some of us want that in politics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

Cry harder, loser.

Ah, we’ve found the village idiot.

No seriously, you need to stfu. If your guy won, you’d be applauding the voters. Now you insult them bc you’re a pathetic loser.

Even if they did vote for him bc of EMPATHY, not pity, accept it. Some of us want that in politics

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this Fetterman won because voters pitied him…..great rationale. He’s an utter embarrassment to the office.

Cry harder, loser.

Ah, we’ve found the village idiot.

The idiot is the one who was convinced a carpetbagging quack snake-oil salesman would win.

[Anonymous]

As a previous poster mentioned, intelligence and knowledge should be prerequisites for the job of elected representative.

However it's nowhere near enough, since that only gets you someone able to circumvent laws to funnel funds into their personal account.

What you need in addition to that is a dedication to honestly serving the public... and now you're looking for a needle in a haystack, because intelligent public servants usually go for the non-elected positions, where they don't have to cater to voters' whims and can do their jobs in peace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fetterman is toast and got killed in the debate.
So fun watching desperate Dem pearl clutchers on here . LOL!;

This aged well. LOL!