Mueller does not find Trump campaign knowingly conspired with Russia

[Anonymous]

The donkey said to the tiger, 'The grass is blue.' Tiger said, 'No grass is green.'
Then the discussion between the two became intense. Both of them are firm in their own words. To end this controversy, both went to Lion – King of Jungle.

In the middle of the animal kingdom, sitting on the throne was a lion. The donkey started yelling before the tiger could say anything. “Your Highness, the grass is blue, isn’t it?” Lion said, 'Yes! The grass is blue. '

Donkey, 'This tiger does not believe. Annoys me He should be punished properly. ' The king declared, 'Tiger will be jailed for a year. King's verdict was heard by donkey and he was jumping in joy in entire jungle. The tiger was sentenced to one-year jail. '

The Tiger went to the Lion and asked, 'Why Your Highness! Grass is green, isn’t it? ' Lion said, 'Yes! Grass is green.’ Tiger said, '... then why am I sentenced to jail? '

Lion said, “you did not get punished for the grass being blue Or green. You have been punished for debating with that stupid donkey. Brave and intelligent creatures like you have argued with a donkey and have come here to get a decision”

Moral of the story.... ?
In 2020 give your vote to the best Democratic candidate....just don’t debate with Cult45 followers or you will be punished for the next 4 years. ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk's tweet says it all:

Democrats in 2015: Eveyone must accept results of the election

Democrats day after the election 2016: We do not accept the results of the election

Democrats 2017: Everyone must accept findings of the Mueller report

Democrats 2019: We do not accept findings of Mueller report

Idiot

What about the above is untrue?

The second and fourth statements. Kirk had to distort them to fit his narrative. He is a phony liar.

[Anonymous]

Rudy Guiliani yesterday on CNN. He confirms to Wolf Blitzer that the 2016 Trump tower meeting was set up to discuss the Russian offer for Hillary emails. Confirms that Don Jr was there for the entire meeting and Kushner was there for half of it but says that the meeting ended up being about the adoption of Russian children. So glad that has been cleared up /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rudy Guiliani yesterday on CNN. He confirms to Wolf Blitzer that the 2016 Trump tower meeting was set up to discuss the Russian offer for Hillary emails. Confirms that Don Jr was there for the entire meeting and Kushner was there for half of it but says that the meeting ended up being about the adoption of Russian children. So glad that has been cleared up /s

Link? Citation? Video clip?

HRC paid for a spy to gather information on Trump and actually had the unverified dossier leaked to press and given openly to elected officials.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk's tweet says it all:

Democrats in 2015: Eveyone must accept results of the election

Democrats day after the election 2016: We do not accept the results of the election

Democrats 2017: Everyone must accept findings of the Mueller report

Democrats 2019: We do not accept findings of Mueller report

Idiot

What about the above is untrue?

The second and fourth statements. Kirk had to distort them to fit his narrative. He is a phony liar.

+1

We haven't even seen the Mueller report yet - how could we accept or reject it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wondered why this thread has turned a thread with no pushback against the liberal "we need to read it, it's not true" posts.

Posts that are criticizing those individuals are being deleted,

Wow.

Welcome to dcum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rudy Guiliani yesterday on CNN. He confirms to Wolf Blitzer that the 2016 Trump tower meeting was set up to discuss the Russian offer for Hillary emails. Confirms that Don Jr was there for the entire meeting and Kushner was there for half of it but says that the meeting ended up being about the adoption of Russian children. So glad that has been cleared up /s

Link? Citation? Video clip?

HRC paid for a spy to gather information on Trump and actually had the unverified dossier leaked to press and given openly to elected officials.

I want what you are smoking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rudy Guiliani yesterday on CNN. He confirms to Wolf Blitzer that the 2016 Trump tower meeting was set up to discuss the Russian offer for Hillary emails. Confirms that Don Jr was there for the entire meeting and Kushner was there for half of it but says that the meeting ended up being about the adoption of Russian children. So glad that has been cleared up /s

Link? Citation? Video clip?

HRC paid for a spy to gather information on Trump and actually had the unverified dossier leaked to press and given openly to elected officials.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the Mueller Report actually said that Trump and his family did nothing wrong, every GOP leader would be calling for its full release. In stead they are doing their utmost to hide it so that Barr's partisan misrepresentations stand. That should tell us what we need to know.

That is just not true. Who is "doing their utmost to hide it?"

MacConnell refused to bring the resolution to floor yesterday, for he second time! Have you heard any GOP leader shouting to release the full report? Its like my son coming from school and saying he has all As on his report card and refusing to show it to me. I am glad I have other ways to access the report card to verify his claim, unlike Muller's report where the party/person benefiting from misrepresenting facts are the one who hold the key to release the complete report!

McConnell blocks resolution calling for release of Mueller report for second time

McConnell again blocked voting on the resolution. This is the third time GOP has blocked voting to block Mueller's report release. What is hiding in the report that they do not want people to see?

[Anonymous]

HRC paid for a spy to gather information on Trump and actually had the unverified dossier leaked to press and given openly to elected officials.

DP.

It is widely reported that the Dems paid for the dossier. Whether HRC knew about it, I have not read. But, her campaign was involved.
It was leaked to the press--which also was likely orchestrated by Dems and given openly to elected officials. It was given to McCain, who, in turn, gave it to the FBI. His aide gave it to press. Whether McCain knew that his aide did this is unknown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the Mueller Report actually said that Trump and his family did nothing wrong, every GOP leader would be calling for its full release. In stead they are doing their utmost to hide it so that Barr's partisan misrepresentations stand. That should tell us what we need to know.

That is just not true. Who is "doing their utmost to hide it?"

MacConnell refused to bring the resolution to floor yesterday, for he second time! Have you heard any GOP leader shouting to release the full report? Its like my son coming from school and saying he has all As on his report card and refusing to show it to me. I am glad I have other ways to access the report card to verify his claim, unlike Muller's report where the party/person benefiting from misrepresenting facts are the one who hold the key to release the complete report!

McConnell blocks resolution calling for release of Mueller report for second time

McConnell again blocked voting on the resolution. This is the third time GOP has blocked voting to block Mueller's report release. What is hiding in the report that they do not want people to see?

McConnell is anti-democracy that’s for sure.

[Anonymous]

Ok, serious question for Trump supporters.

I can understand if you are riled up by dems who thought that the investigation would prove something it didn't. I get that.

But, I do not understand how you can think it was a witch hunt. Trump was hella shady about Russia, comey, ect. I mean come on- what kind of place would be be if someone did NOT look into that.

You can't just ask for Russian help on the campaign trail, fire Comey after you ask for 'loyalty', then celebrate with Russian diplomats. Not to mentioned that ties between his folks and Russia.

I am with you on the over hyping- but do you really REALLY think that the investigation was unwarranted?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok, serious question for Trump supporters.

I can understand if you are riled up by dems who thought that the investigation would prove something it didn't. I get that.

But, I do not understand how you can think it was a witch hunt. Trump was hella shady about Russia, comey, ect. I mean come on- what kind of place would be be if someone did NOT look into that.

You can't just ask for Russian help on the campaign trail, fire Comey after you ask for 'loyalty', then celebrate with Russian diplomats. Not to mentioned that ties between his folks and Russia.

I am with you on the over hyping- but do you really REALLY think that the investigation was unwarranted?

"You can't just ask for Russian help on the campaign trail" - That was a sarcastic comment at a campaign rally to remind his supporters that not only did Hillary delete thousands of emails, but that her server was unsecured and open to hacking by foreign governments. It was effective.

"fire Comey after you ask for 'loyalty' - He fired Comey because Comey deserved to be fired. He had asked Comey three times whether he was a target. Comey told him no all three times but refused to tell the American people that he wasn't a target. As we have seen, Comey was more a politician than he was an intelligence officer. He didn't belong in that role.

"celebrate with Russian diplomats" - He didn't "celebrate with Russian diplomats." He made it clear throughout the campaign that he believed working with Russia on some foreign policy efforts was beneficial to the US - particularly the defeat of ISIS. This whole investigation made it difficult for him to do anything of import when it came to working with them because of how the left would view those efforts.

It was a "witch hunt" because the catalyst for this whole stupid investigation was a ruse. The monitoring of Americans, the bogus dossier, the FISA warrants that were quite possibly illegally obtained - pretty much everything surrounding this investigation was bogus. You may not believe this, but as more comes out WRT the start of this investigation, the more the reasons for opening such an investigation look really questionable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the Mueller Report actually said that Trump and his family did nothing wrong, every GOP leader would be calling for its full release. In stead they are doing their utmost to hide it so that Barr's partisan misrepresentations stand. That should tell us what we need to know.

That is just not true. Who is "doing their utmost to hide it?"

MacConnell refused to bring the resolution to floor yesterday, for he second time! Have you heard any GOP leader shouting to release the full report? Its like my son coming from school and saying he has all As on his report card and refusing to show it to me. I am glad I have other ways to access the report card to verify his claim, unlike Muller's report where the party/person benefiting from misrepresenting facts are the one who hold the key to release the complete report!

McConnell blocks resolution calling for release of Mueller report for second time

McConnell again blocked voting on the resolution. This is the third time GOP has blocked voting to block Mueller's report release. What is hiding in the report that they do not want people to see?

You DO realize there are plans to release his report, right?
You folks are harping on this topic just like you harped on the idea that Trump was going to fire Mueller. That never happened.
And, the idea that this report will somehow be withheld is just as ridiculous.

There will be redactions. There will be some information held back - for good reason. But, the bulk of the report will be released.
Voting on this stupid resolution is just stupid. Since, they know the report will be released.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, serious question for Trump supporters.

I can understand if you are riled up by dems who thought that the investigation would prove something it didn't. I get that.

But, I do not understand how you can think it was a witch hunt. Trump was hella shady about Russia, comey, ect. I mean come on- what kind of place would be be if someone did NOT look into that.

You can't just ask for Russian help on the campaign trail, fire Comey after you ask for 'loyalty', then celebrate with Russian diplomats. Not to mentioned that ties between his folks and Russia.

I am with you on the over hyping- but do you really REALLY think that the investigation was unwarranted?

"You can't just ask for Russian help on the campaign trail" - That was a sarcastic comment at a campaign rally to remind his supporters that not only did Hillary delete thousands of emails, but that her server was unsecured and open to hacking by foreign governments. It was effective.

"fire Comey after you ask for 'loyalty' - He fired Comey because Comey deserved to be fired. He had asked Comey three times whether he was a target. Comey told him no all three times but refused to tell the American people that he wasn't a target. As we have seen, Comey was more a politician than he was an intelligence officer. He didn't belong in that role.

"celebrate with Russian diplomats" - He didn't "celebrate with Russian diplomats." He made it clear throughout the campaign that he believed working with Russia on some foreign policy efforts was beneficial to the US - particularly the defeat of ISIS. This whole investigation made it difficult for him to do anything of import when it came to working with them because of how the left would view those efforts.

It was a "witch hunt" because the catalyst for this whole stupid investigation was a ruse. The monitoring of Americans, the bogus dossier, the FISA warrants that were quite possibly illegally obtained - pretty much everything surrounding this investigation was bogus. You may not believe this, but as more comes out WRT the start of this investigation, the more the reasons for opening such an investigation look really questionable.

Ok- but my point is that reasonable minds can disagree. I definitely don’t think asking for interference in an election should be take as sarcasm. You do. I’ll assume you are reasonable. It prompts an inquiry