Mueller does not find Trump campaign knowingly conspired with Russia

[Anonymous]

Hint- it will be like how the Nunes Memo was undercut by actual primary sources.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia!!!!

It's all Russia!!!!

Everywhere I look, I see Russia!!!!!!

You Dems have become crazier than Sarah Palin.

They said Rs would not accept the results of the election and the Mueller report. This is all hilarious to me. Liberals just can’t deal with losing. Give everyone a trophy mentality has damaged a whole generation

This is hardly a liberal conceit.

Trust what? The Mueller report? Y'all aren't doing that. Instead you are making stuff up because you don't like the results.

Trust but verify the AG, you dumbass.

Because you didn't get what you want the way you wanted it? LOL. Yes, I've heard Mueller screaming that Barr is lying all over the press!

In fact, they are.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

The exact title "Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed". That's pretty weasel worded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia!!!!

It's all Russia!!!!

Everywhere I look, I see Russia!!!!!!

You Dems have become crazier than Sarah Palin.

They said Rs would not accept the results of the election and the Mueller report. This is all hilarious to me. Liberals just can’t deal with losing. Give everyone a trophy mentality has damaged a whole generation

This is hardly a liberal conceit.

Trust what? The Mueller report? Y'all aren't doing that. Instead you are making stuff up because you don't like the results.

Trust but verify the AG, you dumbass.

Because you didn't get what you want the way you wanted it? LOL. Yes, I've heard Mueller screaming that Barr is lying all over the press!

In fact, they are.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

The exact title "Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed". That's pretty weasel worded.

How so?

[Anonymous]

When they come out as other than anonymous and give specific details, then I'll pay more attention.

[Anonymous]

But you paid attention to the leaks from the NY FBI firld office without concern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When they come out as other than anonymous and give specific details, then I'll pay more attention.

Exactly. When an official statement from Mueller, or his team, is released, then we can talk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia!!!!

It's all Russia!!!!

Everywhere I look, I see Russia!!!!!!

You Dems have become crazier than Sarah Palin.

They said Rs would not accept the results of the election and the Mueller report. This is all hilarious to me. Liberals just can’t deal with losing. Give everyone a trophy mentality has damaged a whole generation

This is hardly a liberal conceit.

Trust what? The Mueller report? Y'all aren't doing that. Instead you are making stuff up because you don't like the results.

Trust but verify the AG, you dumbass.

Because you didn't get what you want the way you wanted it? LOL. Yes, I've heard Mueller screaming that Barr is lying all over the press!

In fact, they are.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

The exact title "Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed". That's pretty weasel worded.

How so?

Really? Reading comprehension low? "Some" "More".

[Anonymous]

Not explicitly sourced, so grain of salt, but "[Mueller's] findings paint a picture of a campaign whose members were manipulated by a sophisticated Russian intelligence operation."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/barr-didn-t-do-justice-mueller-report-officials-tell-new-n990776

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia!!!!

It's all Russia!!!!

Everywhere I look, I see Russia!!!!!!

You Dems have become crazier than Sarah Palin.

They said Rs would not accept the results of the election and the Mueller report. This is all hilarious to me. Liberals just can’t deal with losing. Give everyone a trophy mentality has damaged a whole generation

This is hardly a liberal conceit.

Trust what? The Mueller report? Y'all aren't doing that. Instead you are making stuff up because you don't like the results.

Trust but verify the AG, you dumbass.

Because you didn't get what you want the way you wanted it? LOL. Yes, I've heard Mueller screaming that Barr is lying all over the press!

In fact, they are.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

The exact title "Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed". That's pretty weasel worded.

How so?

Really? Reading comprehension low? "Some" "More".

Really. Reading comprehendion high. The only weasel here is you, desperately trying to cling to any half-baked qualifier you can find to squirm your way out of acknowledging what everyone can plainly see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia!!!!

It's all Russia!!!!

Everywhere I look, I see Russia!!!!!!

You Dems have become crazier than Sarah Palin.

They said Rs would not accept the results of the election and the Mueller report. This is all hilarious to me. Liberals just can’t deal with losing. Give everyone a trophy mentality has damaged a whole generation

This is hardly a liberal conceit.

Trust what? The Mueller report? Y'all aren't doing that. Instead you are making stuff up because you don't like the results.

Trust but verify the AG, you dumbass.

Because you didn't get what you want the way you wanted it? LOL. Yes, I've heard Mueller screaming that Barr is lying all over the press!

In fact, they are.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

The exact title "Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed". That's pretty weasel worded.

How so?

Really? Reading comprehension low? "Some" "More".

Really. Reading comprehendion high. The only weasel here is you, desperately trying to cling to any half-baked qualifier you can find to squirm your way out of acknowledging what everyone can plainly see.

Uhhhh, if you agree that "some" and "more" are half-baked qualifiers, wouldn't that mean you agree with the PP's assessment that these are weasel words?

[Anonymous]

But spelling optional even with assistance from your browser.

Whenever someone says some in these contexts, it's always one, possibly two. Some is typical media inflation to create buzz about the story.

Anything negative is going to be more damaging given that the general consensus is that Trump's campaign didn't collude. Again, inflation. Trump's team was almost certainly incompetent. That's damaging but not criminal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But spelling optional even with assistance from your browser.

Whenever someone says some in these contexts, it's always one, possibly two. Some is typical media inflation to create buzz about the story.

Anything negative is going to be more damaging given that the general consensus is that Trump's campaign didn't collude. Again, inflation. Trump's team was almost certainly incompetent. That's damaging but not criminal.

Right don’t forget the 2020 Republican slogan: slime is not a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:John Brennan is such a liar.'

Funny since every president since Kennedy trusted him except for this lying one.

There is reason not to trust him.
Even the left wing media found his lies unacceptable in 2014. The WaPo said he should be fired. Others called for revoking his security clearance.

How else can you explain why CIA Director John Brennan still has his job? Or how Director of National Intelligence James Clapper remains on the federal payroll? Or why Keith Alexander stepped down as head of the National Security Agency only when he was good and ready?

Each of them lied flagrantly to the American people about vital matters of public concern. None paid a price.

The latest example erupted last week, when the CIA's inspector general confirmed that the agency had hacked into Senate Intelligence Committee computers and read emails sent by staffers. The investigation came after U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., revealed the surreptitious search, charging that the CIA had violated federal law and the Constitution.

At the time, Brennan rejected Feinstein's accusation, insisting that "nothing could be further from the truth."

Places far from the truth are his native land. Only after the inspector general delivered his report was Brennan forced to admit he was wrong about Feinstein's complaint — without revealing whether the falsehood was the result of dishonesty or of ignorance.

Yet President Barack Obama shrugged it all off.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chapman/ct-cia-james-clapper-spying-steve-chapman-oped-080-20140807-column.html

OMG!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Roberts uphold or deny a congressional subpoena on the Mueller Report?

The law is pretty clear that the report has to be redacted. Judges interpret laws, especially the three you mentioned.

Actually, the law is pretty clear that it has to go to Congress unredacted!!!!

Redactions are only for the public

LOL, I was thinking a few steps ahead already. Sorry, let me explain - if there is indeed sensitive information the report, there is no way that Barr will release it underacted to congress, because they know doing so is as good as providing it to the public underacted. Congressional Democrats will absolutely leak the document to gain political advantage. There is no judicial remedy for enforcing a congressional subpoena so the original PP's question on the potential actions of the three judges is meaningless within that context. My money is on Barr playing hardball and not providing underacted report to congress. He will be held in contempt of congress, just like Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, and Bryan Pagliano were.

I am old enough to remember JUST LAST YEAR when congressional republicans started this by selectively leaking classified material. See Nunes, Jordan and Gowdy. Are you really this obtuse?

??? Of course they did, and of course Democrats will do the same thing. It's just how congress currently works and it's coming from both sides. Are *YOU* really this obtuse?

Before last year, it has NEVER happened before. Are you that obtuse? Both sides don't do it, but the GOP tried to weaponize selective sealed testimony. See the Nunes memo. It was a fail.

If you think the Democrats don't leak, you are really naiver.
Remember when Hope Hicks' testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee leaked before she even left the room? Adam Schiff, no doubt.

Adam Schiff is an embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Roberts uphold or deny a congressional subpoena on the Mueller Report?

The law is pretty clear that the report has to be redacted. Judges interpret laws, especially the three you mentioned.

Actually, the law is pretty clear that it has to go to Congress unredacted!!!!

Redactions are only for the public

LOL, I was thinking a few steps ahead already. Sorry, let me explain - if there is indeed sensitive information the report, there is no way that Barr will release it underacted to congress, because they know doing so is as good as providing it to the public underacted. Congressional Democrats will absolutely leak the document to gain political advantage. There is no judicial remedy for enforcing a congressional subpoena so the original PP's question on the potential actions of the three judges is meaningless within that context. My money is on Barr playing hardball and not providing underacted report to congress. He will be held in contempt of congress, just like Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, and Bryan Pagliano were.

I am old enough to remember JUST LAST YEAR when congressional republicans started this by selectively leaking classified material. See Nunes, Jordan and Gowdy. Are you really this obtuse?

??? Of course they did, and of course Democrats will do the same thing. It's just how congress currently works and it's coming from both sides. Are *YOU* really this obtuse?

Before last year, it has NEVER happened before. Are you that obtuse? Both sides don't do it, but the GOP tried to weaponize selective sealed testimony. See the Nunes memo. It was a fail.

If you think the Democrats don't leak, you are really naiver.
Remember when Hope Hicks' testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee leaked before she even left the room? Adam Schiff, no doubt.

Adam Schiff is an embarrassment.

Not nearly as embarrassing as a criminal President.