Mueller does not find Trump campaign knowingly conspired with Russia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Mueller, after 2 years, an unlimited budget, with 19 lawyers, and 40 FBI agents could not prove conspiracy or obstruction, then this case should be closed.

If Barr is misrepresenting anything Mueller has said, I have no doubt Mueller would speak up. In fact, it would not surprise me in the least if Barr ran his 4-page summary by Mueller before making it public.

The more the Democrats harp on this, the more it becomes evident that this investigation was not at all about finding a crime. It was about finding a way to get Trump out of office. And, the American people, especially true Independents, are watching.

+1 exactly

I sure as hell am watching . . . and closely.

Well gosh darnit, I'm watching, too! I'm such a true Independent that I blindly accept a prejudiced, partisan interpretation without waiting for the original source document to form my own conclusion! You Democrats better shut your yappers and lay down to let Trump steamroll over you and the Constitution, or else this true independent won't vote for you!

[Anonymous]

Well gosh darnit, I'm watching, too! I'm such a true Independent that I blindly accept a prejudiced, partisan interpretation without waiting for the original source document to form my own conclusion! You Democrats better shut your yappers and lay down to let Trump steamroll over you and the Constitution, or else this true independent won't vote for you!

It's been years. It's now released but the public is still in the dark. Or that's what you think.

If something in that report was damaging, it would have been outed in a day. This is what I think.

So yeah, I'm waiting and watching. But soon 2020 will be here, and the horde of D candidates will be going straight for the jugular.

So you, Mr. or Ms. I, can try to be as witty as you can. But I doubt anything will arise. unless it's the new "Jussie Smollett" case . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Democrat Swalwell standing by his “collusion” claims.
What a pathetic fool he is.

We haven't reached the acceptance phase I see.

The past few pages of this thread? Very telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was Russiagate? A fake conspiracy theory cooked up for the purpose of evading one question: Why did Hillary lose the 2016 election against the worst presidential candidate in US history? Could the answer be that most people did not want another Clinton in the White House? Could it have been that Obama destroyed any prospects of a Democrat winning the election by his service to Wall Street bankers?

No, because (at least) 3 million more people voted for another Clinton than Trump. He is not wanted by the majority.

The majority vote is not relevant. It’s not how the system works.

Nor how presidential candidates campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Mueller, after 2 years, an unlimited budget, with 19 lawyers, and 40 FBI agents could not prove conspiracy or obstruction, then this case should be closed.

If Barr is misrepresenting anything Mueller has said, I have no doubt Mueller would speak up. In fact, it would not surprise me in the least if Barr ran his 4-page summary by Mueller before making it public.

The more the Democrats harp on this, the more it becomes evident that this investigation was not at all about finding a crime. It was about finding a way to get Trump out of office. And, the American people, especially true Independents, are watching.

Hold the phone here...

The REPUBLICANS spent more than 2 years and northward of $80 million in taxpayer dollars and God only knows how much outside money was spent by Republicans on multiple investigations of Hillary Clinton yet they came up with NOTHING, ZERO indictments, not even one prosecutable offense. Now that was a total nothing-burger, far more than the Mueller investigation, yet the Trump supporters still refuse to close the book on it, moronically shouting "lock her up" at Trump rallies.

As opposed to what Mueller did. For one, as for cost, Mueller got back more than was spent in seized Manafort assets, his investigation actually more than paid for itself. And what he uncovered, exposed and prosecuted, that being a long laundry list of serious felonies and 34 indictments that included Trump's campaign chair, his personal attorney, his closest advisors and others in his inner circle. That, and exposing a covert Russian operation filling an entire office complex geared toward sowing discord and divisiveness in the American populace and toward undermining American democracy and destabilizing the West.

If you are a true independent, weighing each side on its merits, the differences should be stark and glaring. Republicans' behavior has been far worse where it comes to political targeting and witch-hunt prosecutions. And, there has been far more actual criminal behavior on the Republican side. That is indisputable.

[Anonymous]

Thank you, PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Mueller, after 2 years, an unlimited budget, with 19 lawyers, and 40 FBI agents could not prove conspiracy or obstruction, then this case should be closed.

If Barr is misrepresenting anything Mueller has said, I have no doubt Mueller would speak up. In fact, it would not surprise me in the least if Barr ran his 4-page summary by Mueller before making it public.

The more the Democrats harp on this, the more it becomes evident that this investigation was not at all about finding a crime. It was about finding a way to get Trump out of office. And, the American people, especially true Independents, are watching.

Hold the phone here...

The REPUBLICANS spent more than 2 years and northward of $80 million in taxpayer dollars and God only knows how much outside money was spent by Republicans on multiple investigations of Hillary Clinton yet they came up with NOTHING, ZERO indictments, not even one prosecutable offense. Now that was a total nothing-burger, far more than the Mueller investigation, yet the Trump supporters still refuse to close the book on it, moronically shouting "lock her up" at Trump rallies.

As opposed to what Mueller did. For one, as for cost, Mueller got back more than was spent in seized Manafort assets, his investigation actually more than paid for itself. And what he uncovered, exposed and prosecuted, that being a long laundry list of serious felonies and 34 indictments that included Trump's campaign chair, his personal attorney, his closest advisors and others in his inner circle. That, and exposing a covert Russian operation filling an entire office complex geared toward sowing discord and divisiveness in the American populace and toward undermining American democracy and destabilizing the West.

If you are a true independent, weighing each side on its merits, the differences should be stark and glaring. Republicans' behavior has been far worse where it comes to political targeting and witch-hunt prosecutions. And, there has been far more actual criminal behavior on the Republican side. That is indisputable.

+1, but some people are too gullible.

[Anonymous]

Hold the phone here...

The REPUBLICANS spent more than 2 years and northward of $80 million in taxpayer dollars and God only knows how much outside money was spent by Republicans on multiple investigations of Hillary Clinton yet they came up with NOTHING, ZERO indictments, not even one prosecutable offense. Now that was a total nothing-burger, far more than the Mueller investigation, yet the Trump supporters still refuse to close the book on it, moronically shouting "lock her up" at Trump rallies.

As opposed to what Mueller did. For one, as for cost, Mueller got back more than was spent in seized Manafort assets, his investigation actually more than paid for itself. And what he uncovered, exposed and prosecuted, that being a long laundry list of serious felonies and 34 indictments that included Trump's campaign chair, his personal attorney, his closest advisors and others in his inner circle. That, and exposing a covert Russian operation filling an entire office complex geared toward sowing discord and divisiveness in the American populace and toward undermining American democracy and destabilizing the West.

If you are a true independent, weighing each side on its merits, the differences should be stark and glaring. Republicans' behavior has been far worse where it comes to political targeting and witch-hunt prosecutions. And, there has been far more actual criminal behavior on the Republican side. That is indisputable.

Absolutely. And if the Mueller Report is so "exonerating" of the President, then why not release it? I hope Nancy Pelosi et al. start calling Mr. Mueller to testify ASAP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am glad it’s over. Democrats need to focus on 2020.

This actually helps Trump. Mueller did his job, and found that Trump is clean.

Mass media can’t move on. It’s like watching their weekly car crash, but it is taking days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Mueller, after 2 years, an unlimited budget, with 19 lawyers, and 40 FBI agents could not prove conspiracy or obstruction, then this case should be closed.

If Barr is misrepresenting anything Mueller has said, I have no doubt Mueller would speak up. In fact, it would not surprise me in the least if Barr ran his 4-page summary by Mueller before making it public.

The more the Democrats harp on this, the more it becomes evident that this investigation was not at all about finding a crime. It was about finding a way to get Trump out of office. And, the American people, especially true Independents, are watching.

+1 exactly

I sure as hell am watching . . . and closely.

Well gosh darnit, I'm watching, too! I'm such a true Independent that I blindly accept a prejudiced, partisan interpretation without waiting for the original source document to form my own conclusion! You Democrats better shut your yappers and lay down to let Trump steamroll over you and the Constitution, or else this true independent won't vote for you!

Take your meds, please.

Your paranoia is not helping anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Mueller, after 2 years, an unlimited budget, with 19 lawyers, and 40 FBI agents could not prove conspiracy or obstruction, then this case should be closed.

If Barr is misrepresenting anything Mueller has said, I have no doubt Mueller would speak up. In fact, it would not surprise me in the least if Barr ran his 4-page summary by Mueller before making it public.

The more the Democrats harp on this, the more it becomes evident that this investigation was not at all about finding a crime. It was about finding a way to get Trump out of office. And, the American people, especially true Independents, are watching.

Hold the phone here...

The REPUBLICANS spent more than 2 years and northward of $80 million in taxpayer dollars and God only knows how much outside money was spent by Republicans on multiple investigations of Hillary Clinton yet they came up with NOTHING, ZERO indictments, not even one prosecutable offense. Now that was a total nothing-burger, far more than the Mueller investigation, yet the Trump supporters still refuse to close the book on it, moronically shouting "lock her up" at Trump rallies.

As opposed to what Mueller did. For one, as for cost, Mueller got back more than was spent in seized Manafort assets, his investigation actually more than paid for itself. And what he uncovered, exposed and prosecuted, that being a long laundry list of serious felonies and 34 indictments that included Trump's campaign chair, his personal attorney, his closest advisors and others in his inner circle. That, and exposing a covert Russian operation filling an entire office complex geared toward sowing discord and divisiveness in the American populace and toward undermining American democracy and destabilizing the West.

If you are a true independent, weighing each side on its merits, the differences should be stark and glaring. Republicans' behavior has been far worse where it comes to political targeting and witch-hunt prosecutions. And, there has been far more actual criminal behavior on the Republican side. That is indisputable.

Excellent points. Can’t wait to hear a reply from the “independent”.

[Anonymous]

I wondered why this thread has turned a thread with no pushback against the liberal "we need to read it, it's not true" posts.

Posts that are criticizing those individuals are being deleted,

Wow.

[Anonymous]

Charlie Kirk's tweet says it all:

Democrats in 2015: Eveyone must accept results of the election

Democrats day after the election 2016: We do not accept the results of the election

Democrats 2017: Everyone must accept findings of the Mueller report

Democrats 2019: We do not accept findings of Mueller report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk's tweet says it all:

Democrats in 2015: Eveyone must accept results of the election

Democrats day after the election 2016: We do not accept the results of the election

Democrats 2017: Everyone must accept findings of the Mueller report

Democrats 2019: We do not accept findings of Mueller report

Idiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk's tweet says it all:

Democrats in 2015: Eveyone must accept results of the election

Democrats day after the election 2016: We do not accept the results of the election

Democrats 2017: Everyone must accept findings of the Mueller report

Democrats 2019: We do not accept findings of Mueller report

Idiot

What about the above is untrue?