Mueller does not find Trump campaign knowingly conspired with Russia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:John Brennan is such a liar.'

Funny since every president since Kennedy trusted him except for this lying one.

What a liar you are.

DP. Perhaps instead of name-calling, you could provide facts, or at least some kind of argument, as to why pp is wrong? I could just go ahead and report your post, but I’ll give you a chance here.

Doubt you'll get any... For the typical Trumpster, their "facts" and "arguments" are "Trump said it" and sitting back, conversation over, though that meant something credible and meaningful, paying to attention to the THOUSANDS of proven lies that Trump has told.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Roberts uphold or deny a congressional subpoena on the Mueller Report?

The law is pretty clear that the report has to be redacted. Judges interpret laws, especially the three you mentioned.

Actually, the law is pretty clear that it has to go to Congress unredacted!!!!

Redactions are only for the public

LOL, I was thinking a few steps ahead already. Sorry, let me explain - if there is indeed sensitive information the report, there is no way that Barr will release it underacted to congress, because they know doing so is as good as providing it to the public underacted. Congressional Democrats will absolutely leak the document to gain political advantage. There is no judicial remedy for enforcing a congressional subpoena so the original PP's question on the potential actions of the three judges is meaningless within that context. My money is on Barr playing hardball and not providing underacted report to congress. He will be held in contempt of congress, just like Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, and Bryan Pagliano were.

I am old enough to remember JUST LAST YEAR when congressional republicans started this by selectively leaking classified material. See Nunes, Jordan and Gowdy. Are you really this obtuse?

??? Of course they did, and of course Democrats will do the same thing. It's just how congress currently works and it's coming from both sides. Are *YOU* really this obtuse?

Before last year, it has NEVER happened before. Are you that obtuse? Both sides don't do it, but the GOP tried to weaponize selective sealed testimony. See the Nunes memo. It was a fail.

If you think the Democrats don't leak, you are really naiver.
Remember when Hope Hicks' testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee leaked before she even left the room? Adam Schiff, no doubt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:John Brennan is such a liar.'

Funny since every president since Kennedy trusted him except for this lying one.

What a liar you are.

DP. Perhaps instead of name-calling, you could provide facts, or at least some kind of argument, as to why pp is wrong? I could just go ahead and report your post, but I’ll give you a chance here.

Doubt you'll get any... For the typical Trumpster, their "facts" and "arguments" are "Trump said it" and sitting back, conversation over, though that meant something credible and meaningful, paying to attention to the THOUSANDS of proven lies that Trump has told.

Hi is a liar. And, he shouldn't be trusted. Most normal people back in 2014 thought he should be fired.

How else can you explain why CIA Director John Brennan still has his job? Or how Director of National Intelligence James Clapper remains on the federal payroll? Or why Keith Alexander stepped down as head of the National Security Agency only when he was good and ready?

Each of them lied flagrantly to the American people about vital matters of public concern. None paid a price.

The latest example erupted last week, when the CIA's inspector general confirmed that the agency had hacked into Senate Intelligence Committee computers and read emails sent by staffers. The investigation came after U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., revealed the surreptitious search, charging that the CIA had violated federal law and the Constitution.

At the time, Brennan rejected Feinstein's accusation, insisting that "nothing could be further from the truth."

Places far from the truth are his native land. Only after the inspector general delivered his report was Brennan forced to admit he was wrong about Feinstein's complaint — without revealing whether the falsehood was the result of dishonesty or of ignorance.

Yet President Barack Obama shrugged it all off.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chapma...-oped-080-20140807-column.html

[Anonymous]

For someone who was exonerated, Trump is acting pretty guilty.

[Anonymous]

It is clear watching Trump's comments today that he has seen the report, or someone has summarized it for him. I thought Barr wasn't sharing it with the White House?

[Anonymous]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/03/26/mueller-report-is-get-ready-conspiracy-theories/?utm_term=.a0c2984ea1bd

This article could be describing the liberal conspiracy theorists on DCUM who just can't let go. I posted this earlier and it was deleted. I wonder why?

"They were all wrong. And being wrong marks a crucial moment for these personalities and the left-leaning people who have followed their dramatic claims about Mueller, gleaned from unnamed inside sources and their own supposed expertise. Will they adjust their statements to better accord with the reported facts, or will they detach even further from reality?"

[Anonymous]

If they were wrong, then release the Mueller report and show it to the world. Why would you not support that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If they were wrong, then release the Mueller report and show it to the world. Why would you not support that?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/03/26/mueller-report-is-get-ready-conspiracy-theories/?utm_term=.a0c2984ea1bd

This article could be describing the liberal conspiracy theorists on DCUM who just can't let go. I posted this earlier and it was deleted. I wonder why?

"They were all wrong. And being wrong marks a crucial moment for these personalities and the left-leaning people who have followed their dramatic claims about Mueller, gleaned from unnamed inside sources and their own supposed expertise. Will they adjust their statements to better accord with the reported facts, or will they detach even further from reality?"

The crazy Libs have nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Perhaps they ought to start looking for a viable candidate, now that Biden is history.

So much nothing that Barr is obstructing the Mueller report. M'okay then.

[Anonymous]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/limited-information-barr-has-shared-about-russia-investigation-frustrated-some-on-muellers-team/2019/04/03/c98e8a02-567a-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1d252bed6a50

Members of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team have told associates they are frustrated with the limited information Attorney General William P. Barr has provided about their nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump sought to obstruct justice, according to people familiar with the matter.

The displeasure among some who worked on the closely held inquiry has quietly begun to surface in the days since Barr released a four-page letter to Congress on March 24 describing what he said were the principal conclusions of Mueller’s still-confidential, 400-page report.

Some members of the office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to two people familiar with their reactions.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according one U.S. official briefed on the matter.

We are in for a big surprise soon!

[Anonymous]

Hey look, here’s Barr’s summary of the Iran Contra report. Notice any differences?

[Anonymous]

The report, including the summaries, need to be released asap. This is nothing short of a total cover-up.

[Anonymous]

So Mueller had already prepared a summary that could be released to the public without revealing classified information or information that might compromise ongoing investigations?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia!!!!

It's all Russia!!!!

Everywhere I look, I see Russia!!!!!!

You Dems have become crazier than Sarah Palin.

They said Rs would not accept the results of the election and the Mueller report. This is all hilarious to me. Liberals just can’t deal with losing. Give everyone a trophy mentality has damaged a whole generation

This is hardly a liberal conceit.

Trust what? The Mueller report? Y'all aren't doing that. Instead you are making stuff up because you don't like the results.

Trust but verify the AG, you dumbass.

Because you didn't get what you want the way you wanted it? LOL. Yes, I've heard Mueller screaming that Barr is lying all over the press!

In fact, they are.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Mueller had already prepared a summary that could be released to the public without revealing classified information or information that might compromise ongoing investigations?

Would love to see that and compare to Barr’s memo.