Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If power players want to fire teachers because it's a popularity contest and not an educational atmosphere the the data needs to reflect poor leadership and not weak teachers that are just whining quitters.
What data are you talking about? You think bad principals do not have their entourage who will protect their boss? In our lower elementary school with less than 500 students we have 6 non classroom teachers who are in the hallways most of the time keeping tabs on others. Obviously these teachers will sing the praises or the principal for having an easy gig. Many others will flock around them so that they won’t be the weakest links and being regarded as someone who is not a team player.
The other day one agressive student smacked his classmate’s face so hard, his fingerprints were on the poor child’s face. Do you think I was allowed to fill out a report? After the “investigation” the kid who was physical told administration that it was an accident. That was it. I was told that I must have been busy and not seen how it had happened. And by the way the kid who was physical happened to be white. The other kid not.
I hope the parents push back. If my child came home with finger marks, damn right I'd be in the school the next day.
My daughter (two-teacher HH, btw) was called a white ho by this kid who was the principal's "pet project." I went directly to a teacher who I knew would handle it. They separated my daughter from him in each class, which was the most I could hope for.
That same kid threatened to shoot up the school in class one day when there was a sub. Guess what? Sub was fired b/c he couldn't "handle" the class. Kid is punishment-free once again.
There is no discipline, and admin are so damn weak and self-preserving. disgusting