Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did we talk about this?

Charlie Kirk suspect was in romantic relationship with transgender roommate
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate


People here are trying to ignore and deflect.

Turns out it was it was as we suspected from the start: radicalized left wing weirdo fueled by his hatred of Charlie’s views.

Hate begets hate.


Yes, the hate of the RWNJs has many casualties.

The right wing have been spewing hateful messages since Trump made it ok to do that. Hate begets hate.

Also, you conveniently ignore actual politicians who are Dems who have been murdered/attacked in the past few years.

And let's not forget Comet Ping Pong. That wasn't lefties who shot up the pizza place.

Words are powerful. If you spew hateful message, you will get hate in return. And Trump is doing nothing to unite the country. He's even more divisive in his second term.

-signed an Independent
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?


Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.


His MAGA, gun nut parents failed him.


His parents turned him in. They saved lives, fool.


The roommate and online gamer group could have saved lives and turned him in beforehand.

But they chose not to.

Are they on suicide watch now and going to do due process?


The Utah governor whose words you take as sacrosanct said the roommate didn't know.

Let me spell it out to you from someone who's former FBI: The governor has also said the roommate is cooperating. They're trying to get as much information out of him as they can before it's clear he will be charged and stops cooperating. Don't be surprised to learn the FBI knew he had knowledge of what his lover Tyler Robinson did this entire time.


Why use "lover"? You don't know that yet. And it outs you for the typical lying MAGA you are.


read the news. yes lovers.
https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-roommate-trans-relationship-65wvslwr8

https://nypost.com/2025/09/14/us-news/charlie-kirk-assassination-suspect-had-furry-fixation-trans-boyfriend-proclaimed-support-for-bidden/

https://www.wionews.com/photos/was-charlie-kirk-s-killer-tyler-robinson-living-with-transgender-partner-lance-twiggs-utah-governor-makes-big-revelation-1757871464138


But the ever predictable gay lover didn’t put the gun in his hand and make him shoot.


did anyone expect this twist??


It’s the narrative Trump and TP need to make money, so sure.


Ummm. they can't just manufacture a gay transitioning roommate.


They aren’t. A neighbor spoke out he saw them holding hands. The roommate didn’t come out often but they were in transition.

The neighbor was either high, drunk or lying.


I thought it didn’t matter if he was trans. Why do you find it so impossible? This says more about you than it does Ms. Twiggs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it have to be someone’s fault and not just the shooter’s own depravity?
I am a democrat and my boys (20s)are productive members of society. Stop blaming and threatening a political party.This just sadly shows me that I am surrounded by people that do not share my norms or morals. Lynch mob mentality is foreign to me. The only battle cries I hear are the distant drumming of a scary divided nation with the beats getting louder and closer.



+100.
I’m right of center and a fan of Charlie Kirk’s and don’t blame the left or anyone else other than Tyler Robinson himself. There always have and always will be mentally unstable people who commit high profile murders. I don’t understand the need to assign “blame” to any political wing. Even if the left is to “blame” for this, obviously some right wing crazy will do something similar in the future.

Because only one political wing labeled him a Fascist.


Name one Democrat that called for his killing. none.

Now go read the stuff the far far right said. Get back to us when you've woken up.


It sure would be nice if the elected democrats would start telling their supporters to knock off the celebrations and the rhetoric.
And, maybe congresspeople like Ilhan Omar should avoid interviews for a while since she has not been able to bring herself to outright condemn his murder and those who are celebrating it.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?


Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.


His MAGA, gun nut parents failed him.


His parents turned him in. They saved lives, fool.


The roommate and online gamer group could have saved lives and turned him in beforehand.

But they chose not to.

Are they on suicide watch now and going to do due process?


The Utah governor whose words you take as sacrosanct said the roommate didn't know.

Let me spell it out to you from someone who's former FBI: The governor has also said the roommate is cooperating. They're trying to get as much information out of him as they can before it's clear he will be charged and stops cooperating. Don't be surprised to learn the FBI knew he had knowledge of what his lover Tyler Robinson did this entire time.


Why use "lover"? You don't know that yet. And it outs you for the typical lying MAGA you are.


read the news. yes lovers.
https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-roommate-trans-relationship-65wvslwr8

https://nypost.com/2025/09/14/us-news/charlie-kirk-assassination-suspect-had-furry-fixation-trans-boyfriend-proclaimed-support-for-bidden/

https://www.wionews.com/photos/was-charlie-kirk-s-killer-tyler-robinson-living-with-transgender-partner-lance-twiggs-utah-governor-makes-big-revelation-1757871464138


But the ever predictable gay lover didn’t put the gun in his hand and make him shoot.


did anyone expect this twist??


It’s the narrative Trump and TP need to make money, so sure.


Ummm. they can't just manufacture a gay transitioning roommate.


They aren’t. A neighbor spoke out he saw them holding hands. The roommate didn’t come out often but they were in transition.

The neighbor was either high, drunk or lying.


I thought it didn’t matter if he was trans. Why do you find it so impossible? This says more about you than it does Ms. Twiggs.


To me it doesn’t matter, it’s just very convenient for people that desperately want trans people to be guilty of something. It will all come out in court.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it have to be someone’s fault and not just the shooter’s own depravity?
I am a democrat and my boys (20s)are productive members of society. Stop blaming and threatening a political party.This just sadly shows me that I am surrounded by people that do not share my norms or morals. Lynch mob mentality is foreign to me. The only battle cries I hear are the distant drumming of a scary divided nation with the beats getting louder and closer.



+100.
I’m right of center and a fan of Charlie Kirk’s and don’t blame the left or anyone else other than Tyler Robinson himself. There always have and always will be mentally unstable people who commit high profile murders. I don’t understand the need to assign “blame” to any political wing. Even if the left is to “blame” for this, obviously some right wing crazy will do something similar in the future.

Because only one political wing labeled him a Fascist.


Name one Democrat that called for his killing. none.

Now go read the stuff the far far right said. Get back to us when you've woken up.


It sure would be nice if the elected democrats would start telling their supporters to knock off the celebrations and the rhetoric.
And, maybe congresspeople like Ilhan Omar should avoid interviews for a while since she has not been able to bring herself to outright condemn his murder and those who are celebrating it.



She might be a little testy since many of his compatriots have been threatening her for years.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did we talk about this?

Charlie Kirk suspect was in romantic relationship with transgender roommate
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate


People here are trying to ignore and deflect.

Turns out it was it was as we suspected from the start: radicalized left wing weirdo fueled by his hatred of Charlie’s views.


Okay, please tell us what "radicalized left wing" means to you. Because if you google search "leftist ideology" Here is what AI gives you. I doubt you'll read any of it but I would ask you: where in there do you see anything in the core principles or various factions about a culture of assassinating your enemies? Admit it, you don't know. Your use of "leftist" is too broad, to undefined, to be seen as a complete over-generalization to a huge group of people 99.9% of whom don't support cold-blooded murder. If it is true he killed Charlie Kirk over his views against trans people, that's a personal thing, not a leftist thing.


Leftist ideology, also known as left-wing politics, broadly encompasses a range of political and social movements that advocate for egalitarianism and social justice. The specific ideas within this umbrella vary greatly, from center-left approaches like social democracy to more radical movements like communism and anarchism.

Core principles
Despite its diversity, leftist ideology is generally defined by several key principles:
Egalitarianism: Promoting human flourishing through cooperation and mutual respect, which requires the elimination of excessive differences in wealth, power, and status.
Social welfare: Regarding social welfare as a primary goal of government and society.
Hostility to traditional elites: Opposition to the power of traditional elites, such as the wealthy and aristocracy.
Support for the working class: Favoring the interests of the working class (or proletariat).

Key historical origin
The terms "left" and "right" originated during the French Revolution of the late 18th century, referring to the seating arrangements in the National Assembly.
Those who sat on the left side of the assembly were generally opposed to the traditional monarchy and aristocracy. They supported the revolution, a democratic republic, and secularism.
Those on the right side supported the traditional institutions of the old order, known as the Ancien Régime.

Major ideological variations
Social democracy
This center-left ideology supports the regulation and modification of capitalist economies to protect social equality, rather than seeking their total abolition.
Advocacy: Policies like a strong welfare state, extensive universal services, progressive taxation, and strong labor rights.
Economics: Favors a mixed economy within a democratic capitalist system and uses government intervention and Keynesian economics.
Social liberalism
As a form of center-left liberalism, this ideology supports capitalism but advocates for regulations to reduce wealth inequality. It holds that individual freedom can be threatened by large private actors and that the government should take action to help individuals realize their full potential.

Progressivism
Progressivism advocates for continuous, gradual social reform to improve society. It is typically associated with social liberalism and social democracy.
Key theme: Redistributive policies aimed at improving societal well-being.
Modern progressivism: In the U.S., it can include policies such as greater wealth redistribution, a higher minimum wage, universal healthcare, and environmental justice.

Democratic socialism
Often considered more radical than social democracy, this ideology seeks to replace capitalism with socialism through democratic and electoral means, rather than a revolution.

Communism
A more radical leftist ideology, it is based on the theories of thinkers like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Communism aims for a classless, moneyless, and stateless society where the major institutions of economic life are controlled by the community or state.

Anarchism
This far-left ideology rejects all forms of involuntary hierarchy and is against state control. Anarchists advocate for a decentralized, classless, and stateless society, where organizing structures are based on mutual cooperation.

Green politics
Emerging in the 1970s, this ideological movement emphasizes environmentalism, social justice, nonviolence, and decentralized governance. It can be viewed as an evolution of New Left or left-libertarian ideas.

Left-wing populism
Becoming more influential since the 2010s, this movement frames politics as a conflict between the common people and an elite. It advocates for policies such as democratic socialism and social democracy.

The complexity of the political spectrum
It is important to note that a single left-right spectrum is often considered an oversimplification. Many political scientists use a two-axis model that considers both economic issues (left-right) and socio-cultural issues (authority-liberty) to provide a more nuanced understanding of different political beliefs. Furthermore, what is considered "left" can change over time and vary significantly across different countries
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?


Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.


His MAGA, gun nut parents failed him.


His parents turned him in. They saved lives, fool.


The roommate and online gamer group could have saved lives and turned him in beforehand.

But they chose not to.

Are they on suicide watch now and going to do due process?


The Utah governor whose words you take as sacrosanct said the roommate didn't know.

Let me spell it out to you from someone who's former FBI: The governor has also said the roommate is cooperating. They're trying to get as much information out of him as they can before it's clear he will be charged and stops cooperating. Don't be surprised to learn the FBI knew he had knowledge of what his lover Tyler Robinson did this entire time.


Why use "lover"? You don't know that yet. And it outs you for the typical lying MAGA you are.


read the news. yes lovers.
https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-roommate-trans-relationship-65wvslwr8

https://nypost.com/2025/09/14/us-news/charlie-kirk-assassination-suspect-had-furry-fixation-trans-boyfriend-proclaimed-support-for-bidden/

https://www.wionews.com/photos/was-charlie-kirk-s-killer-tyler-robinson-living-with-transgender-partner-lance-twiggs-utah-governor-makes-big-revelation-1757871464138


But the ever predictable gay lover didn’t put the gun in his hand and make him shoot.


did anyone expect this twist??


It’s the narrative Trump and TP need to make money, so sure.


Ummm. they can't just manufacture a gay transitioning roommate.


They aren’t. A neighbor spoke out he saw them holding hands. The roommate didn’t come out often but they were in transition.

The neighbor was either high, drunk or lying.


I thought it didn’t matter if he was trans. Why do you find it so impossible? This says more about you than it does Ms. Twiggs.

I don’t care. I think we’re intentionally losing the plot focusing on their relationship, be it platonic or romantic. We’ve lost the plot.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did we talk about this?

Charlie Kirk suspect was in romantic relationship with transgender roommate
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate


People here are trying to ignore and deflect.

Turns out it was it was as we suspected from the start: radicalized left wing weirdo fueled by his hatred of Charlie’s views.


This.


Oh, I bet that we are going to find out so much more about the shooter, the roommate, Turning Point, Fuentes, so many things and people will be introduced into evidence.


Apparently a pastor friend said Charlie Kirk saw him a couple months ago and asked him to pray for him. He told him
“ I think they’re going to try to kill me”. Sadly, he was right.

I know many conservatives get death threats but it’s sad he felt that and he was right.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did we talk about this?

Charlie Kirk suspect was in romantic relationship with transgender roommate
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate


People here are trying to ignore and deflect.

Turns out it was it was as we suspected from the start: radicalized left wing weirdo fueled by his hatred of Charlie’s views.


Okay, please tell us what "radicalized left wing" means to you. Because if you google search "leftist ideology" Here is what AI gives you. I doubt you'll read any of it but I would ask you: where in there do you see anything in the core principles or various factions about a culture of assassinating your enemies? Admit it, you don't know. Your use of "leftist" is too broad, to undefined, to be seen as a complete over-generalization to a huge group of people 99.9% of whom don't support cold-blooded murder. If it is true he killed Charlie Kirk over his views against trans people, that's a personal thing, not a leftist thing.


Leftist ideology, also known as left-wing politics, broadly encompasses a range of political and social movements that advocate for egalitarianism and social justice. The specific ideas within this umbrella vary greatly, from center-left approaches like social democracy to more radical movements like communism and anarchism.

Core principles
Despite its diversity, leftist ideology is generally defined by several key principles:
Egalitarianism: Promoting human flourishing through cooperation and mutual respect, which requires the elimination of excessive differences in wealth, power, and status.
Social welfare: Regarding social welfare as a primary goal of government and society.
Hostility to traditional elites: Opposition to the power of traditional elites, such as the wealthy and aristocracy.
Support for the working class: Favoring the interests of the working class (or proletariat).

Key historical origin
The terms "left" and "right" originated during the French Revolution of the late 18th century, referring to the seating arrangements in the National Assembly.
Those who sat on the left side of the assembly were generally opposed to the traditional monarchy and aristocracy. They supported the revolution, a democratic republic, and secularism.
Those on the right side supported the traditional institutions of the old order, known as the Ancien Régime.

Major ideological variations
Social democracy
This center-left ideology supports the regulation and modification of capitalist economies to protect social equality, rather than seeking their total abolition.
Advocacy: Policies like a strong welfare state, extensive universal services, progressive taxation, and strong labor rights.
Economics: Favors a mixed economy within a democratic capitalist system and uses government intervention and Keynesian economics.
Social liberalism
As a form of center-left liberalism, this ideology supports capitalism but advocates for regulations to reduce wealth inequality. It holds that individual freedom can be threatened by large private actors and that the government should take action to help individuals realize their full potential.

Progressivism
Progressivism advocates for continuous, gradual social reform to improve society. It is typically associated with social liberalism and social democracy.
Key theme: Redistributive policies aimed at improving societal well-being.
Modern progressivism: In the U.S., it can include policies such as greater wealth redistribution, a higher minimum wage, universal healthcare, and environmental justice.

Democratic socialism
Often considered more radical than social democracy, this ideology seeks to replace capitalism with socialism through democratic and electoral means, rather than a revolution.

Communism
A more radical leftist ideology, it is based on the theories of thinkers like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Communism aims for a classless, moneyless, and stateless society where the major institutions of economic life are controlled by the community or state.

Anarchism
This far-left ideology rejects all forms of involuntary hierarchy and is against state control. Anarchists advocate for a decentralized, classless, and stateless society, where organizing structures are based on mutual cooperation.

Green politics
Emerging in the 1970s, this ideological movement emphasizes environmentalism, social justice, nonviolence, and decentralized governance. It can be viewed as an evolution of New Left or left-libertarian ideas.

Left-wing populism
Becoming more influential since the 2010s, this movement frames politics as a conflict between the common people and an elite. It advocates for policies such as democratic socialism and social democracy.

The complexity of the political spectrum
It is important to note that a single left-right spectrum is often considered an oversimplification. Many political scientists use a two-axis model that considers both economic issues (left-right) and socio-cultural issues (authority-liberty) to provide a more nuanced understanding of different political beliefs. Furthermore, what is considered "left" can change over time and vary significantly across different countries



It’s pretty sad you’re trying to hard to deflect away from his trans partner and his leftist ideology.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html


Correct
Leftist and liked D.


Yes. He was in a romantic relationship with him roommate who was in the process of transitioning from male to female.

At the end of the day, I don’t care about his politics. He is a deeply evil human being.

What I care about is that Charlie’s wife is now a widow and his two children have to grow up without a father. I care that they were in attendance and saw the murder of their husband/father.

It’s been so amazing to see how much Charlie Kirk inspired the world. There have been vigils all around the world in many different countries. I know Charlie would be so humbled by this.

Make no mistake, Charlie was assassinated because he was getting through to the younger generation. His influence was huge. He is a martyr. He is gone but his name and influence will live on forever.


While I take issue with most of this post, I wanted to point out that the bolded is factually incorrect.


It isn’t. It’s been confirmed that they were there. Even protestors that were there said they were.


Correct.
Charlie Kirk’s Wife and Children Were Present at Utah Valley University During Fatal Shooting: Report
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/charlie-kirk-wife-children-were-222115937.html


If you follow the link in that inquirer story, they reference the BBC and the BBC has retracted that information.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So now, it is known that the shooter was:
1. A Leftist
2. Gay

How long will the left continue to deny their role here?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

The left doesn’t own this person. What about his MAGA parents?


Try again. The left wanted Kirk dead. MAGA didn't.


Please cite real, verifiable sources for this. There certainly is plenty of evidence the far alt-right were after him. Where are the death threats from the "left"? Exactly WHO do you mean by "the left". Where did "they" call for his death, versus vehemently disagreeing with him.

This is a huge accusation you are making. What is your specific and verifiable proof?


Try and keep up, again. Every major news outlet has tons of articles about legiobn of Dems being fired for celebrating his murder.


You have not answered the question. Who are these "leftists" that called for his death. Where do you see this. If you cannot produce an example, you are talking out your ass.

Also, this idea of "celebrating" is being over used. There were not legions of people celebrating. There may be quite a few that don't care that he is dead or won't mourn him or posted his own words. That's not celebrating. Not to mention, simple searches can show you people on the right doing the exact same thing for political violence against Democrats or liberals. A GOP SENATOR had inappropriate posts after the deaths of the Minnesota politicians. Did you condemn him so vehemently? Kirk himself made inappropriate comments after the attack on Paul Pelosi. Were you appalled then?

So you RWNJ with your pious cries of foul play have no leg to stand on. You tolerate lies and mocking and worse by RWNJs against libs and Dems All the Time but suddenly you are so appalled by people who don't fall into tears and wailing when Charlie Kirk dies.

Hypocrisy writ large.


Sure, deny what is in front of the entire countty. No one is doing your homework for you. No one will stop you from shining a light on your moronic ignorance either. Continue to pop off with lies while we all laught at you. Maybe your boss will even fire you. You never know...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did we talk about this?

Charlie Kirk suspect was in romantic relationship with transgender roommate
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate


People here are trying to ignore and deflect.

Turns out it was it was as we suspected from the start: radicalized left wing weirdo fueled by his hatred of Charlie’s views.

Hate begets hate.


Yes, the hate of the RWNJs has many casualties.

The right wing have been spewing hateful messages since Trump made it ok to do that. Hate begets hate.

Also, you conveniently ignore actual politicians who are Dems who have been murdered/attacked in the past few years.

And let's not forget Comet Ping Pong. That wasn't lefties who shot up the pizza place.

Words are powerful. If you spew hateful message, you will get hate in return. And Trump is doing nothing to unite the country. He's even more divisive in his second term.

-signed an Independent


I am not going to get into a tit-for-tat with you. I could name plenty of incendiary remarks and actions on the part of the left that has caused death and destruction (have we forgotten about the baseball shooting or the attempted assassinations of Kavanaugh/Lee Zeldin/Trump?).

When people are constantly - and i mean CONSTANTLY - referred to as fascist, nazis, and the like - it signals to unhinged idiots that these people need to be taken out by any means necessary. Why wouldn't you want to kill a Nazi?

And, one more thing.... signing yourself as an "Independent" means nothing. Nothing at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it have to be someone’s fault and not just the shooter’s own depravity?
I am a democrat and my boys (20s)are productive members of society. Stop blaming and threatening a political party.This just sadly shows me that I am surrounded by people that do not share my norms or morals. Lynch mob mentality is foreign to me. The only battle cries I hear are the distant drumming of a scary divided nation with the beats getting louder and closer.



+100.
I’m right of center and a fan of Charlie Kirk’s and don’t blame the left or anyone else other than Tyler Robinson himself. There always have and always will be mentally unstable people who commit high profile murders. I don’t understand the need to assign “blame” to any political wing. Even if the left is to “blame” for this, obviously some right wing crazy will do something similar in the future.

Because only one political wing labeled him a Fascist.

Kirk was anti-trans and was very vocal about it. Hate begets hate. I don't believe people should be murdered for their political views, but in this country, where so many have easy access to guns, I would definitely not say anything publicly that could trigger people, pardon the pun.

Also, if Kirk and MAGA are so supportive of free speech, why do they want to dox people for voicing their opinions about Kirk?


Charlie Kirk didn’t believe in trans but he was not mean towards them. He didn’t hate them.

The left started it with cancel culture. You can’t be angry now that it’s turning back onto your side.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it have to be someone’s fault and not just the shooter’s own depravity?
I am a democrat and my boys (20s)are productive members of society. Stop blaming and threatening a political party.This just sadly shows me that I am surrounded by people that do not share my norms or morals. Lynch mob mentality is foreign to me. The only battle cries I hear are the distant drumming of a scary divided nation with the beats getting louder and closer.



+100.
I’m right of center and a fan of Charlie Kirk’s and don’t blame the left or anyone else other than Tyler Robinson himself. There always have and always will be mentally unstable people who commit high profile murders. I don’t understand the need to assign “blame” to any political wing. Even if the left is to “blame” for this, obviously some right wing crazy will do something similar in the future.

Because only one political wing labeled him a Fascist.


Name one Democrat that called for his killing. none.

Now go read the stuff the far far right said. Get back to us when you've woken up.


It sure would be nice if the elected democrats would start telling their supporters to knock off the celebrations and the rhetoric.
And, maybe congresspeople like Ilhan Omar should avoid interviews for a while since she has not been able to bring herself to outright condemn his murder and those who are celebrating it.



I repeat, show me where they called for his murder. They didn't.

Many people who condemn the murder are having a hard time swallowing the lionization of this man. He was not a good man. Earnestly believing his killing was wrong and that he was not a good person are not mutually exclusive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it have to be someone’s fault and not just the shooter’s own depravity?
I am a democrat and my boys (20s)are productive members of society. Stop blaming and threatening a political party.This just sadly shows me that I am surrounded by people that do not share my norms or morals. Lynch mob mentality is foreign to me. The only battle cries I hear are the distant drumming of a scary divided nation with the beats getting louder and closer.



+100.
I’m right of center and a fan of Charlie Kirk’s and don’t blame the left or anyone else other than Tyler Robinson himself. There always have and always will be mentally unstable people who commit high profile murders. I don’t understand the need to assign “blame” to any political wing. Even if the left is to “blame” for this, obviously some right wing crazy will do something similar in the future.

Because only one political wing labeled him a Fascist.

Kirk was anti-trans and was very vocal about it. Hate begets hate. I don't believe people should be murdered for their political views, but in this country, where so many have easy access to guns, I would definitely not say anything publicly that could trigger people, pardon the pun.

Also, if Kirk and MAGA are so supportive of free speech, why do they want to dox people for voicing their opinions about Kirk?


Charlie Kirk didn’t believe in trans but he was not mean towards them. He didn’t hate them.

The left started it with cancel culture. You can’t be angry now that it’s turning back onto your side.


The right are the masters of cancel culture. And they like to mix in death threats so spare me.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: