Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:US birth rate has plunged from 3.19 in 1964 to 1.80 today and is well below threshold needed to replace population. There are 950,000 abortions per year (increasingly concentrated among poor women). If not for immigration, US population would be getting smaller.
We actually need these people or else face a Japan problem.
Or you know, we could make it easier and provide incentives for our citizens to have larger families.
Like universal healthcare, maternity leave, subsidized childcare, secondary education, etc?
Yes, exactly like those programs. And you cannot have open borders or an ineffective way to deport people and have those programs.
Please point out which GOP official is advocating for any of those programs. LOLOLOL!
None. But neither are democrats advocating putting meaningful restrictions on immigrants so that we can have nice things.
You are mistaken if you think people in the middle of the country would not take that deal IF controls were in place to actually deport illegal immigrants. Remember Bernie was the biggest threat before he started talking amnesty. People like the idea of universal healthcare. they dont like the idea of non-citizens taking advantage of our system.
This doesn’t make any sense because undocumented people are not eligible for most government services. Certainly not Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, SNIP, ACA subsidies, Social Security, etc.
So you don’t want to extend benefits to citizens...out of spite?