there is a mechanism for suspending them. But that would tank their college prospects and make TJ look bad, so it won't happen |
Yes, but they're required to self-report those disciplinary steps. Schools are prohibited from reporting those because of privacy rights. And kids who cheat are not really known for being honest on their college applications - but that's another topic entirely. |
So kick out the cheaters. But let's not use the cheaters as an excuse to be racist against Asian Americans. |
|
If TJ is 70% African American, it will be celebrated by everyone.
TJ is 70% Asian American, so they must be prepping and cheating. |
Drink and sex among young kids? Nothing new here |
More like drinking, sex, and cheating among teens? Nothing new here. |
A fair amount of drinking at TJ, more than you'd expect - but not a lot of sex. By far less than you would see at any other high school, if for no other reason than the kids live forever away from one another. |
1) They can't kick out the cheaters 2) Agree - but leveling the playing field so that buying a loaded lottery ticket that's seemingly only available to Indians isn't a thing isn't racist against Asian-Americans |
|
Why? Why? Why?
Why do you guys blame an entire race? There are a few bad apples in each race. Likewise there is so much to learn from each other. Can we please stop with this race baiting? I know most of you come here is because you care for your kids. Is this the example you want to set for them? |
why? why? why? does a system that can be and is being gamed have to be perpetuated? |
This is not a coherent thought. Try again. |
|
Overwhelming public evidence exists that the new TJ admissions process was adopted with the purpose of disadvantaging Asian-American students and reducing Asian American enrollment at TJ. As such, these changes violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Helping URMs is a noble goal, but you cannot be biased against Asian Americans in the process. The board essentially gerrymandered the application process to kneecap Asian Americans. The intent is clear. The application process needs to be redesigned by a board that doesn't hold stereotypes against Asian Americans. The board didn't even pretend to be neutral. |
By definition increasing URM numbers at TJ will decrease Asian and White numbers- the math is really simple there. You're basically saying that desegregation is a per se violation of the equal protection clause because it necessarily disadvantages one race- good luck with that |
This whole TJ thing is motivated by critical race theory (CRT). Proponents of which perceives TJ as one of the symbol that concentrates power into current white dominated system and one that that should be and could be easily dismantled. It won’t do much good for the URMs but make the social justice warriors happy. It may not be racist but definitely smothered in racial politics. |
+1. This lawyer who wrote the Hill op-Ed piece is either a staggeringly poor lawyer or a staggeringly brilliant businesswoman. These families are going to end up paying gobs and gobs of legal fees - both their own and FCPS’ if the case is even heard - and it’s only going to get worse the further up they appeal. And for what? If you’re the type of kid who is helped by the old admissions process, you’re also the type of kid whose college admissions prospects will be hurt by going to TJ over your base school. It just doesn’t add up. |