| Why are you revealing so much personal information. Your problems are luxurious compared to mine. |
I am the PP you are responding to. You are still getting it wrong. She does not have to "fight for her fair share"--she will get her fair share according to the law (unless she agrees otherwise). The "fighting for your fair share" mentality makes the attorneys get a lot of that "fair share" instead of keeping it yourself. Fighting as a way of divorce makes you spend way more money. Agreeing mostly through collaborative divorce lawyers or mediation allows people to keep more of their money. The "fighting" as if you are not going to get what you deserve and wanting to make sure you get every last penny nickel and diming has attorneys laughing all the way to the bank. |
He’s not really that active in the US in business for anyone to guess the family from my posts. Maybe I just need to go through things in writing, getting others thoughts to make my plan. What is your concern exactly ? Don’t worry about my privacy if I am not worried. |
No, I personally would not go digging into offshore stuff. You could spend so much more. I would ask for a forensic accountant for US stuff, I'd ask for 50/50 on easily found US stuff, and I would ask that he pay for education and college costs for your son (as a negotiating thing...he pays for all education...you don't go digging around Europe). I would not want to waste any more time in this...and I would not want a long costly and protracted legal battle. I would want half of what I can see and get out before wasting more years. |
Thank you for practical advise. Attorney here also suggested "I don't go digging in Europe" as a negotiation point, but to have court distribute US assets in my favor. The thing is, while he was away 1/3 time on business, the loans were paid on US properties from business accounts here that are in my name, from income generated primarily by me and clientele base that I built as work from home mom. It's easy to prove for any accountant, and I can show contracts I've made etc. It seems to me that if the division here is 50/50, he will get half of our joint business here, and won't have his hidden business split in Europe. The potential sale cost of business in Europe is dozens of mln. Doesn't seem to be fair division if he's only on hook for college. I don't plan to remarry or even get a boyfriend. I am really sick of men. If US businesses remain under my control I can easily finance my son's education and more. |
All of this can be negotiated through a collaborative divorce. Ask for more then (more time with alimony or whatever or all of the house or whatever) as a negotiating point to avoid going through European business holdings. Your attorney sounds smart. You are making this harder than it needs to be. You are in a much better position than most people in a divorce. I gave up my house. I put all the money down. I agreed to less than half of the equity back. When you get a divorce, you really have to look to the future and not how you did things in the past ...that already happened. He already built the companies. I already paid all the down payment on the house. That's over. Look forward. If you are done with the marriage, be done. Stop trying to recover losses that are already losses. It sounds like that attorney is smart. |
How can I ensure he pays for all education, if I am not even certain my soon to be ex is going to stay in the US after divorce? I cannot run after him tracking accounts in off-shore countries to collect for college. In that sense it's better for me to go after everything in the US. If I request to create an educational fund prior to divorce, he would also oppose it as it would reveal him moving money to the fund from abroad and his foreign trusts. I don't trust him anymore, what is he abandons his son irresponsibly for luxury life of a fund manager in Europe? |
Again, your attorneys can go back and forth in a collaborative divorce until you agree on terms. You have to agree to get in done via paperwork. Let the attorneys deal with it until terms are fair. Then it is in writing in the divorce decree. If attorneys can’t work it out, go to court. But that is the most costly and traumatic way. You can’t control what he does after a divorce...I would not care. It’s on him. Your job is to be a mother...his decisions as a father are not yours to make. |
|
One possibility is that he is quietly and actively transferring assets and preparing for divorce. You should do the same. Use this time to consult with attorneys, transfer anything you can, line your nest.
And by the way, you say you don't trust him now and express concern you couldn't enforce an order that he pay for the kids' education. That does not sound like someone you should salvage a marriage with. |
I would not hide assets...bad advice. Even if he is hiding stuff. I would not give more time to hide anything. I'd just start the process. |
|
I like the idea of collaborative divorce. But what if he drafts his project of division of assets, and, if I don't like it, just tells "want more -go to court"? Collaborative divorce implies he would agree to it, right? How did you make your ext husband agree to it?
It's not possible to transfer US assets. It's real estate on both our names. His salary comes to join account, we spend money from that account on everyday expenses. |
If you are both from the former USSR, then surely you know that most men who built fortunes in the new Russia have offloaded their wives #1 and moved on to new models and kids with them by now. It's not just an American thing. It's an "update" mentality - I have more money now, I deserve an update. It's rare to find a man in the Forbes Russia list who's still married to his college sweetheart. OK, maybe Mr Gazprom still is. Kudos for that. |
If collaborative divorce does not work then yes, you go to court. I did not do collaborative divorce. We technically did mediation. But it was not a true mediation. We just decided ourselves and told them to write it up. Attorneys reviewed docs before we signed. I agreed to less. It was cheaper than it would have been to fight him for exactly half. I likely would have gotten less that I got if we did traditional litigation. Mediation is cheaper than collaborative divorce. Collaborative divorce is for people who don't want to talk about terms...so their attorneys do it on their behalf. We could talk about terms and I was not willing to fight and when I realized I would lose more $ fighting. Attorneys in collaborative divorce (or the two of you in mediation) can agree to anything in the terms for the divorce decree and stay out of court. |
He's not that wealthy (maybe other woman thinks he is, or he's too egocentric to consider himself a finance super star). In general, yes, you are right, the urge to "upgrade" to wife version 3.0 exists doesn't depend on national origin. This is why I am sick of men in general. No matter who they are, they are very likely to backstab you, once they become more wealthy. Because they are selfish and children, family values mean less to him. They don't even try to work on marriages. The principle "want to be married to a general, you first need to live with a lieutenant for 20 years" never works in real life. Once your mortgages are repaid, life is more or less settled financially, there comes another woman. Always. |
But most of the time, after breaking the family they don't really become happier. They don't understand that the best days of their life already happen, not until it's too late. Women, on the other side, become wiser, and coupled or not, find inspiration, strength and ultimately happiness, just look around! |