demoralized in MCPS

Anonymous
I hate to burst everyone’s sanctimonious bubbles... I have seen more kids with behavior issues who are not in the special needs program at my kid’s former elementary school than kids with special needs. Let’s call a spade a spade.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Teacher bias is real. It is also true that suspension rates will not magically line up with the demographic numbers of the school system. Suspension will be more prevalent with at risk kids living in poverty with poor home support and supervision. In MCPS the kids in those circumstances are more likely to be AA or hispanic -not because of their race but because of the poverty.

The way to handle teacher and staff bias is to implement effective anti-bias training and have an oversight group review incidents to identify bias and correct it. This requires work and admission that someone did something wrong when the group finds bias -two thinks which MCPS avoids like the plague. Instead of addressing teacher bias, the central office has decided to just not discipline kids and push racial quotas for suspensions onto the schools. If I am a principal, I'm going to ignore kids beating up other kids, selling drugs, threatening kids or teachers, or sexually harassing the girls because I need to save my suspension spots for the kid that brings a knife or gun into the school and either tries or succeeds in using it.


Is there even such a thing?


It's under the umbrella of equity/equitable practices.

There's the Harvard Implicit Bias test that ran its course, too. The goal is to make whites aware of their bias. But those of us of who have taught in majority minority schools, with high FARMs/high ESOL just laugh at the training. We don't see many people scrambling to fill our spots, and when there is an opening, the new person doesn't last.

So maybe we need to look at this situation through the eyes of teachers instead of BLAMING teachers.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
In the case of the Damascus rape case, the parent was notified numerous times by MCPS teachers/staff regarding the child's behavioral issues. The student was basically passed around to a different school, along with the issues. Unfortunately, staff at the schools hands were tied.



I don't know the details of the Damascus rape case, but couldn't the student have been dismissed from the team (for low grades and/or behavioral issues)? If so, then I wouldn't say that the staff at the school's hands were tied.


No, no, no. This student should not have been on the team at all. Parent is to be blamed for procreating but the school has to be blamed too for not protecting other students.

On the other hand, the DHS sports culture was that of assh0lery in more ways than one. The DHS team was aggressive and violent even when playing against other schools. I am from a school where some of the sports parents complained to our own coach about the abusive behavior of the DHS team and asked him to talk to DHS coach. I do not know what happened but now the parents of athletes from our school have been told to attend the games of their own children and record every minute on their smartphones.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So why exactly can’t schools suspend or expel violent and dangerous students?

Special education laws and racial issues


It is well known that some parent groups such as MOCO NAACP parents council request MCPS to lower the suspension rate for student from some race groups. Because the students who get suspended won't be able to learn . This sounds plausible. But why good intention doesn't bring good result?


What a mischaracterization! The NAACP simply requests that black students be treated fairly. Teachers have biases too. It is entirely plausible that due to those biases, a teacher or staff will witness disruptive behavior from a student, but will treat that behavior differently depending on the child's race.

But I suppose if you feel that black and brown kids are inherently bad or misbehave in general, you are fine with the disproportionate suspensions for black and brown kids vs their white and Asian counterparts.

DP.. I do think our justice system is deeply racist, BUT, it is not helping *anyone* to keep these violent kids in regular school. The other students are being victimized twice -- once by the violent student and again by a school system that may have their heart in the right place, but is hurting these other kids.


I don't believe that anyone thinks that violent kids should be kept in school, no matter their race.

But when you have kids getting suspended for disrespect or insubordination, and those kids are disproportionately black and brown, then I believe there is a good reason for Black and Brown parents to be concerned about biases on behalf of teachers, principles and staff. And THAT is what the NAACP is trying to address.


Sorry, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions. What is needed is CCTV in every classroom and let the parents and teachers and students determine what is fair based on what they see on the video.

The irony is that every single black or hispanic who gets killed, or shot down or bullied is an extremely bright student who was doing every thing right and could have done a lot for the country, their community and for their family. The rapists and criminals who get to live are the worst kind of black and hispanic student who will get a slap on the wrist.

In a fair world, the dregs of society from all races would destroy each other instead of the best and brightest. Can the criminals and the violent racists just war on each other?

Anonymous
How can this be? Student behavior problems in MCPS?

I thought the principal calls the police every time there is a behavior problem. Even if on the weekend!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So why exactly can’t schools suspend or expel violent and dangerous students?

Special education laws and racial issues


It is well known that some parent groups such as MOCO NAACP parents council request MCPS to lower the suspension rate for student from some race groups. Because the students who get suspended won't be able to learn . This sounds plausible. But why good intention doesn't bring good result?


What a mischaracterization! The NAACP simply requests that black students be treated fairly. Teachers have biases too. It is entirely plausible that due to those biases, a teacher or staff will witness disruptive behavior from a student, but will treat that behavior differently depending on the child's race.

But I suppose if you feel that black and brown kids are inherently bad or misbehave in general, you are fine with the disproportionate suspensions for black and brown kids vs their white and Asian counterparts.

DP.. I do think our justice system is deeply racist, BUT, it is not helping *anyone* to keep these violent kids in regular school. The other students are being victimized twice -- once by the violent student and again by a school system that may have their heart in the right place, but is hurting these other kids.


I don't believe that anyone thinks that violent kids should be kept in school, no matter their race.

But when you have kids getting suspended for disrespect or insubordination, and those kids are disproportionately black and brown, then I believe there is a good reason for Black and Brown parents to be concerned about biases on behalf of teachers, principles and staff. And THAT is what the NAACP is trying to address.


But these are the kids who are exhibiting the majority of the disrespect and insubordination. I think that’s the crux of the issue. They’re not facing consequences because of the color of their skin, but because of the choices they make. What are schools with predominantly black/brown populations supposed to do? I think that’s what OP is saying implicitly. If you are in a focus or title 1 school then that’s the majority of your population and if black/brown students are not allowed to face consequences then no one is facing consequences. Then there’s the byproduct of brown/black kids not facing consequences for their choices but white/Asians facing consequences for the same behavior because there’s no quota for white/Asian the way there is for black/brown. It’s a flawed system all around.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
In the case of the Damascus rape case, the parent was notified numerous times by MCPS teachers/staff regarding the child's behavioral issues. The student was basically passed around to a different school, along with the issues. Unfortunately, staff at the schools hands were tied.



I don't know the details of the Damascus rape case, but couldn't the student have been dismissed from the team (for low grades and/or behavioral issues)? If so, then I wouldn't say that the staff at the school's hands were tied.


No, no, no. This student should not have been on the team at all. Parent is to be blamed for procreating but the school has to be blamed too for not protecting other students.

On the other hand, the DHS sports culture was that of assh0lery in more ways than one. The DHS team was aggressive and violent even when playing against other schools. I am from a school where some of the sports parents complained to our own coach about the abusive behavior of the DHS team and asked him to talk to DHS coach. I do not know what happened but now the parents of athletes from our school have been told to attend the games of their own children and record every minute on their smartphones.


It starts from a young age. We live in an area close to Damascus and play teams from DSA in youth sports. A few teams are good sports and the players and coaches play by the rules but a few teams (players, coaches and parents) are downright rude and don’t display good sportsmanship. I’m always glad my kid isn’t on their team.
Anonymous
What is the suspension or discipline “quota” posters are referring to?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What is the suspension or discipline “quota” posters are referring to?


Schools are only allowed to suspend a certain number of brown/black students per year, and avoid suspension entirely unless it’s something like bringing a weapon to school or a clear cut unprovoked severe physical assault on another student. No one but admin knows exactly what that number is, but there is strong pressure to not give strong consequences to black/brown students.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

But these are the kids who are exhibiting the majority of the disrespect and insubordination. I think that’s the crux of the issue. They’re not facing consequences because of the color of their skin, but because of the choices they make. What are schools with predominantly black/brown populations supposed to do? I think that’s what OP is saying implicitly. If you are in a focus or title 1 school then that’s the majority of your population and if black/brown students are not allowed to face consequences then no one is facing consequences. Then there’s the byproduct of brown/black kids not facing consequences for their choices but white/Asians facing consequences for the same behavior because there’s no quota for white/Asian the way there is for black/brown. It’s a flawed system all around.


I know, and many other people do too, that when it comes to children's behavior in school, whether or not it's considered "disrespect and insubordination" is affected by the child's race/ethnicity.

A shorter way of saying it is: my blond, blue-eyed kid could get away with behavior a black or Latino kid likely couldn't.
Anonymous
No wonder everyone educated who is an URM goes to private school. Who needs these peer influences or worse, to get caught up in it!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

The OP was talking about mostly violent behavior.. destroying property, etc.. but even if it's just verbal disruptive behavior, it is still affecting the other kids.

Maybe MCPS took RJ too far by including disruptive, violent behavior, because such kids aren't being kicked out of school. They seem to be given chance after chance.

And I agree with another PP.. this kind of behavior starts at home. I see parents who are just as disrespectful and terrible to teachers right in front of their kids, who mimic the parents' behavior. If the school system tried to kick the kid out for this type of behavior of course the parent will balk since the parent behaves in the same manner. Parent doesn't think there's anything wrong with the kid. And I have seen non black/brown parents behave this way, too.

Perhaps MCPS should just have a three strikes law -- three violent incidents, and you're out.


Out where?

That is what MPCS needs to address. They need to figure that out because as it is the rest of the students are being victimized by the current system.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So why exactly can’t schools suspend or expel violent and dangerous students?

Special education laws and racial issues


It is well known that some parent groups such as MOCO NAACP parents council request MCPS to lower the suspension rate for student from some race groups. Because the students who get suspended won't be able to learn . This sounds plausible. But why good intention doesn't bring good result?


What a mischaracterization! The NAACP simply requests that black students be treated fairly. Teachers have biases too. It is entirely plausible that due to those biases, a teacher or staff will witness disruptive behavior from a student, but will treat that behavior differently depending on the child's race.

But I suppose if you feel that black and brown kids are inherently bad or misbehave in general, you are fine with the disproportionate suspensions for black and brown kids vs their white and Asian counterparts.

DP.. I do think our justice system is deeply racist, BUT, it is not helping *anyone* to keep these violent kids in regular school. The other students are being victimized twice -- once by the violent student and again by a school system that may have their heart in the right place, but is hurting these other kids.


I don't believe that anyone thinks that violent kids should be kept in school, no matter their race.

But when you have kids getting suspended for disrespect or insubordination, and those kids are disproportionately black and brown, then I believe there is a good reason for Black and Brown parents to be concerned about biases on behalf of teachers, principles and staff. And THAT is what the NAACP is trying to address.

The OP was talking about mostly violent behavior.. destroying property, etc.. but even if it's just verbal disruptive behavior, it is still affecting the other kids.

Maybe MCPS took RJ too far by including disruptive, violent behavior, because such kids aren't being kicked out of school. They seem to be given chance after chance.

And I agree with another PP.. this kind of behavior starts at home. I see parents who are just as disrespectful and terrible to teachers right in front of their kids, who mimic the parents' behavior. If the school system tried to kick the kid out for this type of behavior of course the parent will balk since the parent behaves in the same manner. Parent doesn't think there's anything wrong with the kid. And I have seen non black/brown parents behave this way, too.

Perhaps MCPS should just have a three strikes law -- three violent incidents, and you're out.


I agree with a lot of what you posted, but I was specifically addressing the comment about the NAACP and their concerns with regard to suspensions.

It is really easy to latch on to that (as some in thus thread have done) and make assumptions that black and brown parents aren't disciplining their kids and groups like the NAACP just want to allow violent kids to stay in school.

I don't condone any disruption in the classroom and I certainly don't condone violence. I have a 4th grader and I always ask him if there are any disruptive or violent students in his class. From his account there aren't any. 60% of the students at his school are black or Hispanic and 38% of them are FARMS.

I do feel for the OP. Having a workplace that is demoralizing is tough. I appreciate teachers and I hope things get better in MCPS.

Perhaps NAACP started out this way because of history, but IMO, today, they include violent kids in regards to less suspension, or at least that's how MCPS is treating these violent kids.

I do think, however, there are some who are quick to blame bad parenting whenever a black/brown kid acts up, but whenever a white/asian child does then it's the old.. "must be SN" excuse. It's a bit like when a brown person commits a terrorist act, it's "they are evil", but when a white person does then it's "mental illness".

Either way, students who are consistently and constantly disruptive need to be removed from class. Why should 99% of the class suffer because of the bad behavior of the *one* child?
Anonymous
Right now there are tons of studies the seem to support a narrative that is usually referred to as a "schools to prison pipeline" because they show children that have been suspended have a much higher likelihood of both dropping out of school and ending up in prison.

As other folks have stated, this has led to huge nationwide pressure (so don't worry MCPS, you're not alone) to reduce suspensions at all costs. I doubt there will be any changes to this policy for a number of years.

It will be very interesting after these policies have been in place long enough for the students who attended school under these policies reach their late 20s early 30s.

If the theory is correct, there should be some significant decline in the number of people sent to prison, because (hooray!) we "eliminated" the "schools to prison pipeline."

But what if that decline doesn't happen? What if the act of getting suspended is not the causation, and instead simply a correlation?

What if all that happens is that the kids that engaged in bad behavior didn't get suspended while in school, but once they are adults out in society, they continue their previous pattern of bad behavior and now that behavior leads to prison?

If that ends up being the case, we will have lived through decades of this failed policy before schools are allowed to swing the pendulum back.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

But these are the kids who are exhibiting the majority of the disrespect and insubordination. I think that’s the crux of the issue. They’re not facing consequences because of the color of their skin, but because of the choices they make. What are schools with predominantly black/brown populations supposed to do? I think that’s what OP is saying implicitly. If you are in a focus or title 1 school then that’s the majority of your population and if black/brown students are not allowed to face consequences then no one is facing consequences. Then there’s the byproduct of brown/black kids not facing consequences for their choices but white/Asians facing consequences for the same behavior because there’s no quota for white/Asian the way there is for black/brown. It’s a flawed system all around.


I know, and many other people do too, that when it comes to children's behavior in school, whether or not it's considered "disrespect and insubordination" is affected by the child's race/ethnicity.

A shorter way of saying it is: my blond, blue-eyed kid could get away with behavior a black or Latino kid likely couldn't.


The behaviors we are referring to are not your run of the mill too much talking, hard time staying in line, etc. If your blond, blue-eyed kid is physically attacking others, spitting at teachers, saying “I’ll effing kill you” to another student etc then your blond, blue-eyed kid would likely be suspended because these no pressure to not suspend white kids. In fact, it makes the suspension rate at a school seem more equitable to central office. Your blond, blue-eyed kid would not get away with the behavior.

But by and large it’s not the blond, blue-eyed kids who are doing these things (not always, but usually). In my school (focus) we have very few blond, blue-eyes kids but we do have a lot of brown/black kids who are the ones with these behavior issues. But the brown/black kids are not facing consequences for doing these things because they’re brown/black and they’re basically untouchable. Everyone’s “hands are tied” when it comes to these students. That’s what we’re referring to here. —teacher
Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Go to: