"It's ok to be white" ... NO IT IS NOT

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I always tell people I'm multiracial now when they assume I'm white. It's embarrassing. I used to never think of it, but now, I don't want to be thought of as white, even though I pretty much am.

Well reverse passing should be easy for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Go back far enough in the DNA of any "white person" and it's all an illusion. 10,000 years ago, there probably weren't evan any "white people" - pale European skin is a fairly recent mutation.

"White" is a shorthand way to refer to the Caucasian race. I.e., the race that populated Europe, India, and the Middle East.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s the goal here?

Making useful idiots out of victim-mindset whites in order to allow the wealthy to pass this shitastic tax bill, so they can guarantee dynastic wealth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

For the same reason Hillary Clinton ignored whites in the 2016 election. She used that DNC list as her outline to win through identity politics. Her only shift was away from African Americans (her revenge FU to Obama) in favor of Muslims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go back far enough in the DNA of any "white person" and it's all an illusion. 10,000 years ago, there probably weren't evan any "white people" - pale European skin is a fairly recent mutation.

"White" is a shorthand way to refer to the Caucasian race. I.e., the race that populated Europe, India, and the Middle East.

Along with the Aryan race

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

The answer to that question is yes. yes he/she is that stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

For the same reason Hillary Clinton ignored whites in the 2016 election. She used that DNC list as her outline to win through identity politics. Her only shift was away from African Americans (her revenge FU to Obama) in favor of Muslims.

I agree she ignored whites in favor of identity politics, but she didn't shift away from AAs. She pandered to them big-time, which was very evident on the first night of her convention. She even went so far as to honor the mother of a black thug who was killed by a cop protecting himself from a likely fatal encounter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

For the same reason Hillary Clinton ignored whites in the 2016 election. She used that DNC list as her outline to win through identity politics. Her only shift was away from African Americans (her revenge FU to Obama) in favor of Muslims.

Delusions are strong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.

It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.

Why is every other race allowed to form groups based on heir race, but if whites do it then they are "white supremacists?" For example the black congressional caucus, NAACP, La Raza, etc.

None of those groups is about their supremacy. White supremiscists are about, you guessed it, the supremacy of the white race over all others. Jews will not replace us! Blood and soil!

I'm not talking about white supremacists. I'm talking about the new strain of republican "nationalists." Not the same thing as the KKK or neo nazis. I'm saying that whites are forming a mainstream political identity just like other races have. Do you take the position that ANY white political movement, analogous to what every other race has done, is automatically about "white supremacy"?

So being a Republican is only for White people? American pride is only for White people?

Certainly not *only* for whites. But it is becoming the preferred party for whites. Is the Democratic Party only for blacks since 100% of the Black Causus are democrats? No, but you have made it the preferred party for whites, along with a menagerie of other special interest groups.

False. Don't try your gaslighting with me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the goal here?

Making useful idiots out of victim-mindset whites in order to allow the wealthy to pass this shitastic tax bill, so they can guarantee dynastic wealth.

Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner and this is the way it's always been with this couuntry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I always tell people I'm multiracial now when they assume I'm white. It's embarrassing. I used to never think of it, but now, I don't want to be thought of as white, even though I pretty much am.

That's your problem -- called "White guilt" - I put it on a par with "White Supremacy."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

I'd argue that it's non-whites and liberals that have forced whites to look at themselves as "white," far more than white supremacist groups. Traditionally, whites have looked at themselves as English, Irish, Italian, German, etc. But all of those groups are deemed to have "white privilege." So it wasn't the European ethnicities that decided they love each other (in fact, they have fought throughout US history). Instead, it was the liberals who pushed them all into the same camp.

That's some seriously warped horseshit rationalization right there.

You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

The answer to that question is yes. yes he/she is that stupid.

Plus “Ethnic Americans”. That would include Irish, Italian, Polish. Etc, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

Whites are not going to be a minority unless you group them against all non-whites. I guess if you seee the world as white or non-white this might be true. But that's just stupid. The non-white population is incredibly diverse.

The majority of births are non white. That means that whites in the future will no longer be the majority (in the 2040's).

http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/07/01/484325664/babies-of-color-are-now-the-majority-census-says

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.