^^^ack, before the grammar police come after me..."THERE are no western families...." I started with one sentence and wound up with another. |
huh, I went to school with a rich white kid whose father bought a brand new mercedes when his son wrapped his BMW around a tree while drunk driving. |
Huh? My parents lived very modestly. They drove cheap cars till they literally died, rarely did we go on vacations and our house was old and basic. They did pay fully for college and graduate school (to the schools our our choice, including my sister going to ivy's). They bought us each a car at 22 as we needed them for graduate school and helped with downpayment for us to buy homes. What more should they have done? We are doing the same for our kids. |
the white father had no love though ![]() |
I'm American, but OP is right. We've become a throwaway society, in more ways then one sadly. If nothing else, our children need a good extended family; even adopted would do. |
Why do Indians smell so badly? Don't your people bathe?
Why do your people abort so many girl babies? Why are you all software engineers? See how much fun stereotypes are, OP? |
The fundamental tension in the US is the question of what's better, the individual or the group. That carries over into family values. |
I don't even know where to start with this. First of all, love isn't measured in money. Second, I don't know any parents who have limits on how much they love their children. I don't know any parents who wouldn't die for their children if that was necessary. The parents I know give their time, their money, and their energy to their children in big ways and small ways. They might not do everything for their children, because they want to teach their children how to be strong and independent and be able to care for themselves, but that has nothing to do with how much they love their children. If your definition of love is "giving up absolutely everything, destroying your marriage, and going into debt to buy your kids stuff," and "seeing your child as an extension of yourself," then I suppose you wouldn't think that Westerners love their children. But you're just so, so, so wrong. And frankly, offensive. |
I think there are general cultural differences, but there is good and bad to those. And honestly, they are just generalizations, not absolute truths. Do we as a country need to be less throwaway? Yes. Health Care alone (even see Sicko?) is appalling. And the the cost of elder care is ridiculous. As is COL. People HAVE to work until they die most of the time. Ever tried to care for a sickly/dying parent full time AND try to work? Yeah, good luck with that. But that is really going on tangents about policies. But I don't think it is fair to say that Western Culture on the whole is throwaway. There are a lot of pressures on the modern family that complicate all of this. |
Except there are so many exceptions that there's barely a rule left. I see people caring for their families all the time--parents helping their children get a good start in life; adult children helping to care for elderly parents; family members pitching in to help someone in a tough spot. We might complain about our families more than others, but we don't love them less. |
Much of what appears to be a cultural difference is actually just the outcome of public welfare programs. You don't see many Western families having the elderly grandparents live with them because financially, those elderly relatives have retirement accounts, social security, health insurance, and they may or may not have their own housing options - that's the case with my parents. They likely will never *need* to live with us, but a few generations ago, that wasn't the case even in America.
My husbands' Indian parents, on the other hand, have no social security, no health insurance, and their retirement account is diminimus - they likely will need to live with us, or at least depend upon our financial support. It's not that we have greater regard for his parents and less regard for mine. It's that one set of parents lived their lives and worked for their whole careers in an economy that was designed for self-sufficiency even in old age; the other has lived and worked in a society where those opportunities were limited and they now are destined not to be self-sufficient in a few years. Let's not romanticize that. |
True, but many Indian in-laws who are millionaires live with their SIL/DILs, *in this country*, because that is how they expected retired life to be like. Lots of hotel-owning Patel families. Lots of doctors and engineers who are now retired and want to be taken care of "the right way". ![]() It's expected. Some women comply. Many don't. - Indian-American who does not live with her inlaws or parents |
How do you not comply if that's what's expected in your culture? |
I am Indian. We have had lots of family drama. My guess is that you've been spared since you've been away from your extended family for twenty years. My mom was estranged from her brother for many years after he kicked their father out of their home.
There are other relatives who don't speak to each other, people who have disowned their children for not marrying the correct race/religion . I am just astounded that you haven't experienced this. All families have their issues and if you looked more closely at your own family you'd see the cracks. |
I like you! |