I see so many of my DD's co-workers who do not make wise choices with their money, they could already own a condo if they gave up some of the frivolous stuff they spend their money on, life choices is what is boils down to. I live with roommates or family for as long as I could when I was younger to save money for a down payment and worked two jobs, not because I wanted to but because I felt it was the only way I could get to where I wanted to live. Kinda sad not to see that drive in the younger generation today, I miss seeing it. |
|
Sign the petition.
Share the petition. https://www.change.org/p/protect-single-family-zoning-in-montgomery-county |
No they won’t do “just fine”. Their home values will depreciate and decline. That’s the whole point of rezoning. To reduce the costs of homes. |
Yeah, right. Mommy and daddy paid all expenses for your overpriced, paper pushing education, which allowed you to "save more diligently" than others. You also hit the jackpot on the cock carousel, allowing you to get him to buy you your home (or at least allow you to pool your money) in exchange for birthing his children. So spare us your sanctimonious BS about saving more diligently and being more successful. Housing is not an investment. You're gonna learn the hard way. |
Ha, nope. Parents were very blue collar. Graduated with tons of debt I paid off. Zero help with a down payment. Unlike your worthless degree, I decided to study hard and picked engineering. Don't get mad you're a renter little man. You are so mediocre at life, have reached middle age now, and are angry at your position in life. You want take your frustrations out on people more successful than you through their own hard work because you stink at life. Keeping dreaming. As if no one the world has ever worked hard and achieved success. Go back to your sh!tty MoCo county govt or community activist job paying $45k a year. You should have studied harder in school and been more motivated. Don't take your small syndrome out on the rest of us. |
Actually, housing is an investment. And it has been historically. Not sure where you are getting your “information” other than in the corridors of your resentment that people save for homes and rightfully expect that investment to be protected by their government. |
The expectation that zoning will not change - or will only change if the current residents of the neighborhood agree - is not a reasonable expectation. |
I'm the PP you're responding to, and I've been a homeowner in Montgomery County for 25 years. In fact, I've been a homeowner of a detached SFH in Montgomery County for 25 years. And yes, I support the proposal. |
Why? |
Because the county needs more housing, of all types. Because it makes sense to allow that housing to be built in many parts of the county, where there already is housing. Because I am not afraid of renters or multi-unit housing. Because I want Montgomery County to be a place where my kids will want to live, and be able to afford to live. And not just my kids, but all of the other kids in MCPS. All our kids. |
You can't whine about more housing until you remove all of the illegal immigration hogging housing resources. You can't roll out the red carpet for illegal immigrants then complain about lack of affordable housing. Why should citizens ruin their neighborhoods because immigrants suck up huge amounts of affordable housing units that could be used for citizens? How about no? I'll agree to upzoning once you can actually prove there is a 'housing crisis' after you remove all foreign nationals not here legally. |
So you are against democracy and you want developers to steamroll county residents? That is very progressive of you. |
DP. Housing is an expense. A house is an asset. That, along with the property, might appreciate or depreciate, depending on market conditions. We have come to expect appreciation, and it is likely in a growing area due to general supply/demand. Investment in a house/property has up front (down payment, transaction, move, etc.), periodic carrying (taxes, repair, etc.) and exit (transaction, any applicable cap gain tax, etc) costs that can be seen either as a part of one's housing expense, part of the investment expense or both. It may end up being a good investment or a bad one, especially in light of alternate investment options (opportunity cost) and expenses related to alternate housing options (e.g., renting). And you are correct, there is a reasonable expectation that government policy not undermine that investment, if not protect it. There are many associated societal benefits. That should be weighed and considered with other expectations of govenment, encouraging adequate housing among them. Also with many associated societal benefits. From the approach taken and from the resulting plan, that consideration among expectations appears to be sorely lacking in MoCo government at the moment. |
| It's honestly hilarious how much good liberals think they're doing but are ultimately wiping out the last leg of wealth for the middle class. Middle class wages don't keep up. something like 80% of the entire stock market is owned by 1%. The only way to build and save wealth for the middle class are their homes. Now moronic libs, in their ridiculously stupid myopic shortsightedness want to take away home ownership from the middle class. These dumb libs are doing the bidding of investment firms and developers under the guise of 'affordable housing'. In the end they're just trying to steal all of the property and land that is left in the hands of the middle class. They want to bulldoze all of our neighborhoods so they can turn us all into an entire nation of renters for life. And the liberal council and moronic Democrats of the county will help them wipe us all out once they turn all of our neighborhoods to sh!t so they can come in and swipe our land for below market value. |