Pre ECNL Girls Teams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

McLean lost its ECNL charter, so you will have to leave the club and join FVU to do ECNL. I would go with Arlington so you can stay in one club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

Did you just make up random numbers to make your point sound better? Why do ECNL rosters average 25 and GA 18? That's not even remotely true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

Did you just make up random numbers to make your point sound better? Why do ECNL rosters average 25 and GA 18? That's not even remotely true.

PP Here, good point. But in this area it is true, easy to look up on al the websites. Not sure about the rest of the country. And it is unknowable. But with all the families flocking to ECNL, their rosters are bloated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

McLean lost its ECNL charter, so you will have to leave the club and join FVU to do ECNL. I would go with Arlington so you can stay in one club.

I do like Arlington for this reason. If I had to do it all over, Id start there providing we got a good coach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Go to Valor if you want to lose every single match.

This is the thinking of parents who make the wrong decisions for their kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

Did you just make up random numbers to make your point sound better? Why do ECNL rosters average 25 and GA 18? That's not even remotely true.

PP Here, good point. But in this area it is true, easy to look up on al the websites. Not sure about the rest of the country. And it is unknowable. But with all the families flocking to ECNL, their rosters are bloated.

Come on. We all know GA is closer to ECNL-RL than ECNL. ECNL-RL girls are playing in college too. It'd be great if college coaches actually "looked for talent". Looking at college attendance at ECNL vs GA showcases isn't a number which can be fudged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

McLean lost its ECNL charter, so you will have to leave the club and join FVU to do ECNL. I would go with Arlington so you can stay in one club.

I do like Arlington for this reason. If I had to do it all over, Id start there providing we got a good coach.

Do they have any good coaches?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

Did you just make up random numbers to make your point sound better? Why do ECNL rosters average 25 and GA 18? That's not even remotely true.

PP Here, good point. But in this area it is true, easy to look up on al the websites. Not sure about the rest of the country. And it is unknowable. But with all the families flocking to ECNL, their rosters are bloated.

2024 had about 2600 ECNL girls and 2300 GA girls graduating.

The 2025 commits were about 68% out of the ECNL leagues, 21% out of GA, about 4-5% international, and the rest DPL, USYS, etc.

If you had a girl who wants to play college ball, and who would be top team regardless, and were choosing between GA and ECNL, unless the GA is Top Hat, you’d be stupid to choose GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

Did you just make up random numbers to make your point sound better? Why do ECNL rosters average 25 and GA 18? That's not even remotely true.

PP Here, good point. But in this area it is true, easy to look up on al the websites. Not sure about the rest of the country. And it is unknowable. But with all the families flocking to ECNL, their rosters are bloated.

2024 had about 2600 ECNL girls and 2300 GA girls graduating.

The 2025 commits were about 68% out of the ECNL leagues, 21% out of GA, about 4-5% international, and the rest DPL, USYS, etc.

If you had a girl who wants to play college ball, and who would be top team regardless, and were choosing between GA and ECNL, unless the GA is Top Hat, you’d be stupid to choose GA.

-Father of 19th player on an ECNL roster

Manifest it homie!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

McLean lost its ECNL charter, so you will have to leave the club and join FVU to do ECNL. I would go with Arlington so you can stay in one club.

I do like Arlington for this reason. If I had to do it all over, Id start there providing we got a good coach.

McLean didn’t lose ECNL. Their top team is FXU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

there not even close. Its not that GA doesnt have good players. Its just ECNL has locked down the college pathway for programs anyone cares about in the past 2 years. But there so many more D1 Girls soccer programs than Boys. If your DD wants to play in college there are options. But the bigs schools are pretty loaded with ECNL talent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why pre-encl? Outside of the top 4 teams it doesn’t really matter.

What are the top 4 teams?

GFR, Arlington, Loudoun, McLean

I'm not sure I would include GFR in there but certainly Arlington, Loudoun and McLean as the top three.

Agree on GFR as it depends on the year. GFR’s 2014 girls pre-ECNL is very strong but their 2013 team is just okay.

+1

Maybe SYC to round out the top 4....but I definitely agree with the above mentioned as top 3.

Someone mentioned top 4 pre ECNL. SYC would be pre GA. No longer part of ECNL.

Thats just night correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools.

Why does the topic always shift to which teams win the most and then inevitably is ECNL or GA better for winning?

GA is pretty much done. ECNL has monopolized college pathways. Both are competitive but ENCL is the route you want to take if your DC is looking to play at college level.

-Thats just not correct at all. GA had 700 GA players commit to playing colleges from 91 GA clubs. 413 to D1, 133 to D2, 126 to D3 and 21 to NAIA schools. GA has not been around that long, when compared to ECNL. But their college commitments impressively keep rising year after year. Also, the rosters in GA are a lot smaller... so girls get alot more playing time. So yes, I would also consider the pre-GA teams also if college is your goal.

It’s absolutely true. GA keeps falling behind year over year. They are many more girls D1 programs so of course there are GA players making crappy programs. Now pull stats on the top college programs. They comprised mainly of ECNL players. Its like over 70%. ECNL has monopolized college path.

Mathematically they are comparable. 128 Girls ECNL Clubs with average roster of 25 per team = 3200 players -vs- 91 GA clubs with average roster of 18 per team = 1638 players. This is almost a 2 to 1 ratio. So, 70% ECNL to 30% GA seems just about right. This is not a which league is better argument, but this gives the OP context to also look at Pre-GA teams.

Did you just make up random numbers to make your point sound better? Why do ECNL rosters average 25 and GA 18? That's not even remotely true.

PP Here, good point. But in this area it is true, easy to look up on al the websites. Not sure about the rest of the country. And it is unknowable. But with all the families flocking to ECNL, their rosters are bloated.

2024 had about 2600 ECNL girls and 2300 GA girls graduating.

The 2025 commits were about 68% out of the ECNL leagues, 21% out of GA, about 4-5% international, and the rest DPL, USYS, etc.

If you had a girl who wants to play college ball, and who would be top team regardless, and were choosing between GA and ECNL, unless the GA is Top Hat, you’d be stupid to choose GA.

https://www.soccerwire.com/news/ecnl-girls-alumni-comprise-70-percent-of-players-in-womens-college-cup/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go to Valor if you want to lose every single match.

This is the thinking of parents who make the wrong decisions for their kids.

jij bent dom

[Anonymous]

so in the fall they move to 11v11, do they also move to a size 5 ball?