Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't buy Tuckernuck because they rip off other designers. They ripped off that woman who made striped shirts. They ripped off Oscar de la Renta with that long tunic caftan style dress with the red poppies down the front from the Spring 2019 collection. (Tuckernuck's was pale blue with red flowers instead of cream, and was conveniently taken down from the website after two days, so I suspect ODLR's lawyers were on the case.) Now they are ripping off ME+EM, a British knitwear designer, with a rip-off of the popular knit shift dress from last summer. Except instead of navy and cream, Tuckernuck made theirs black and white.
What kills me is when that woman with the striped shirts first came out and said they stole her designs, Tuckernuck pulled the victim card and had all their Georgetown cronies come to their defense in the comments. Then immediately went back to ripping off designs. Like, if you don't want people to think you rip off other designers...don't do it so publicly!
Their founders and leadership are all from the same college and grad school network and a lot of them invested in the company and are quick to defend it and promote it. This is not unique to Tuckernuck -- lots of little corners of DC culture work this way. It works great for the people on the inside but yes it is kind of gross when the company or people who are being defended are acting shady. Have seen it more than once and it's not going to change anytime soon.
These women are the daughters of men who were part of real "old boys networks" and what they took from that is that there is power in using a group to advance and protect each other from criticism and competition. On the one hand I guess there is progress in it being a "middle age girls club" but on the other hand it still winds up being classist and racist and protecting people who are already very privileged from the consequences of their own actions so it's like weird sideways progress and ultimately maybe not that great.