Too thin? At what point to friends intervene. Nicole Kidman allegedly is “too thin “

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone care that iggy pop is too thin? or Mick Jagger? These are just different body types.

Start a thread about them then

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

[Anonymous]

I hate what Nicole has done to her face, I don't think it is an improvement on what natural aging would have done especially since she is so fair and stays out of the sun. She would have done better to choose the path of Helen Mirren and Judi Dench, et al.

As to her weight in those photos - it's insane that anyone is calling her too thin or anorectic. She has plenty of muscle and fat pad over it in those photos.

Her body looks like mine did from my teens until my late 20s, before I allowed myself to surrender to stress and emotional eating and gained a ton like so many American women do today. If I still had the same body shape I did in my 20s now in my 50s, I would look and feel fantastic - just as Nicole does.

The bitter truth is that this board is full of overweight and obese women (and men) who hate what they've allowed to happen to their bodies through their own poor choices, and feel compelled to attack someone who put the effort in to stay in the healthy weight range for her height even as she aged into her middle 50s.

The only ugly and derangement going on here is from those posters, not Nicole Kidman.

And for the record - I've worked with eating disordered people for years. I know what anorexia looks like. Kidman is not that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

Oh i see. You are just saying you “know” her BMI is healthy based on nothing at all. I’m at least basing my opinion on what is actually written.

Shouldn’t you be researching doctors for your osteoporosis? I guarantee you if you don’t yet have it, you will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hate what Nicole has done to her face, I don't think it is an improvement on what natural aging would have done especially since she is so fair and stays out of the sun. She would have done better to choose the path of Helen Mirren and Judi Dench, et al.

As to her weight in those photos - it's insane that anyone is calling her too thin or anorectic. She has plenty of muscle and fat pad over it in those photos.

Her body looks like mine did from my teens until my late 20s, before I allowed myself to surrender to stress and emotional eating and gained a ton like so many American women do today. If I still had the same body shape I did in my 20s now in my 50s, I would look and feel fantastic - just as Nicole does.

The bitter truth is that this board is full of overweight and obese women (and men) who hate what they've allowed to happen to their bodies through their own poor choices, and feel compelled to attack someone who put the effort in to stay in the healthy weight range for her height even as she aged into her middle 50s.

The only ugly and derangement going on here is from those posters, not Nicole Kidman.

And for the record - I've worked with eating disordered people for years. I know what anorexia looks like. Kidman is not that.

Just to add - the healthy approach would be to look at Kidman (or Aniston, or JLo, et al.) and say, clearly it is physiologically possible to stay lean and fit well into middle age and beyond, so I need to either accept wholeheartedly that I am choosing to be fat, or get off my ass, shut off the streaming service and the doom and judgment scrolling and get myself out for walks, weight training, and learning to eat a healthy nourishing diet while I nourish my mental crap with something other than food and alcohol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

I 'know' she has a healthy BMI because I've performed hundreds of caliper tests on women and men over the years and I know what healthy looks like and doesn't. Nicole Kidman's BMI isn't unhealthy; however the people posting here to say she is are, possibly, suffering some mental disorder.

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

Oh i see. You are just saying you “know” her BMI is healthy based on nothing at all. I’m at least basing my opinion on what is actually written.

Shouldn’t you be researching doctors for your osteoporosis? I guarantee you if you don’t yet have it, you will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

I 'know' she has a healthy BMI because I've performed hundreds of caliper tests on women and men over the years and I know what healthy looks like and doesn't. Nicole Kidman's BMI isn't unhealthy; however the people posting here to say she is are, possibly, suffering some mental disorder.

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

Oh i see. You are just saying you “know” her BMI is healthy based on nothing at all. I’m at least basing my opinion on what is actually written.

Shouldn’t you be researching doctors for your osteoporosis? I guarantee you if you don’t yet have it, you will.

I 'know' she has a healthy BMI because I've performed hundreds of caliper tests on women and men over the years and I know what healthy looks like and doesn't. Nicole Kidman's BMI isn't unhealthy; however the people posting here to say she is are, possibly, suffering some mental disorder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly she looks skinny, but healthy, but I have to admit she looks like a bobble head doll in the photo where she’s wearing a tie-dye t-shirt.

She looks anorexic in that picture.

Thin-shaming.

She's much healthier than overweight people.

Yet you seem to be fine with fat-shaming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

Oh i see. You are just saying you “know” her BMI is healthy based on nothing at all. I’m at least basing my opinion on what is actually written.

my god, when you've lost the lady to "facts" scribbled by radaronline sourcing national enquirer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So she hasn't been getting enough attention and fed this to Radar Online. Got it.

+1. This is just being released to remind Hollywood that Nicole is still skinny and fierce. It's impossible to tell from this pic if she is "too thin" in a health sense. Obviously we can all have an opinion on her appearance and our personal preferences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

Oh i see. You are just saying you “know” her BMI is healthy based on nothing at all. I’m at least basing my opinion on what is actually written.

Shouldn’t you be researching doctors for your osteoporosis? I guarantee you if you don’t yet have it, you will.

Written where - Raddar online?
Well, this is "written" too:
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/nicole-kidman-silently-struggling-fans-155617480.html

There's an expert opinion that she's 25 lbs below average weigh. My point exactly. Still within normal BMI or slightly lower.

[Anonymous]

She looks FANTASTIC in this photo. She is NOT an anorectic.

The people writing this awful stories for the media and the baying hounds writing their nasty critical comments are just ugly, jealous souls. If you woke up tomorrow looking like this, you'd thank the heavens and run out to buy yourself a brand new wardrobe then spend endless hours posting selfies of your fantastically fit and beautiful body.

What a bunch of creeps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mostly she looks skinny, but healthy, but I have to admit she looks like a bobble head doll in the photo where she’s wearing a tie-dye t-shirt.

She looks anorexic in that picture.

Thin-shaming.

She's much healthier than overweight people.

There's literally no way you can know that. You can't see her cholesterol level, her blood pressure, her A1C, etc.
Signed,
I'm thin but terribly unhealthy (thanks, genetics!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

I 'know' she has a healthy BMI because I've performed hundreds of caliper tests on women and men over the years and I know what healthy looks like and doesn't. Nicole Kidman's BMI isn't unhealthy; however the people posting here to say she is are, possibly, suffering some mental disorder.

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

Oh i see. You are just saying you “know” her BMI is healthy based on nothing at all. I’m at least basing my opinion on what is actually written.

Shouldn’t you be researching doctors for your osteoporosis? I guarantee you if you don’t yet have it, you will.

I 'know' she has a healthy BMI because I've performed hundreds of caliper tests on women and men over the years and I know what healthy looks like and doesn't. Nicole Kidman's BMI isn't unhealthy; however the people posting here to say she is are, possibly, suffering some mental disorder.

Well you can take your calipers and shove them up your ass. If she’s indeed 120 pounds that’s a 16.7 BMI. And if she 125 it’s 17.4. BOTH are underweight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

They can't discern any more what's a healthy weight, since nowadays healthy is not what you normally see! Norm does not equal health.

So then they look at a healthy person, and freak out that they're too thin.

It becomes a vicious circle, because people will more easily slide into the overweight category, thinking that overweight is healthy because it's the norm.

Mind-boggling.

Nicole Kidman has a BMI in the range of normal.

Do you?

It says her weight is 105. Her height is 5’11 according to at least a few posters here. That is a BMI of 14.6, which is nowhere near normal.

Idiot.

NP. There is no way that her weight is 105 lbs, this is someone as clueless as you estimating her weight. She's about 120-125 lbs and that's the lowest someone of her height can go without being hospitalized.

Hospitalized for what exactly? So hospitals are full of supermodels now? I agree she is NOT 105lbs., not even close. But your statement about being 120-125 lbs is also crazy.