University of DCUM. Very hard to get into. Need a hook.
|
I totally disagree with waiting for kids. If you both have bachelor's degrees and good white collar jobs, there is literally no reason to wait. Everyone I know who had kids pretty quickly after college is doing great. It didn't hurt their careers what-so-ever. If anything, it got them more ($) help from grandparents (no greater joy than grandkids) and more promotions at work, especially the husband. Married with kids young men look reliable and more mature to the rich bosses. It's a fact. |
I was a legacy. |
|
I accidentally did this and it worked very well, so I'll agree wtih this advice.
Met husband at 11, started dating at 18, married at 24, had kids at 29, 32, and 36, and lived happily ever after
|
27 is not a spring chicken. Not everyone is a late bloomer. Society collectively encouraging younger people to take their lives seriously (and not have bad pickers, very important) sooner rather than later would be a good thing for the vast majority. |
First baby at 22 to 25 is better than first baby at 30. I don't get why OP recommended two college-educated married 20-somethings with access to upwards of 6 months paid maternity/paternity leave and great health insurance wait five years to have kids. You get married to have kids. Waiting five years is pointless. Your body bounces back when you have kids in your early or mid 20s. You have exponentially more energy. You're the cool young attractive parents throughout their schooling and extracurriculars. You won't need IVF. Moms can work from home now. Married men with children get faster promotions. |
Do you have children yet? A baby at 27 would have changed you and the father, presumably for the better. Most men don't grow up until they have a kid. Women too. In retrospect I was so selfish and immature before my first. |
I see enough desperate 30+ year old men and women to appreciate this advice. |
| DCUM women will chafe at the idea of marrying and having kids young because they typically wait until they’re old enough to be grandmothers to get rolling. Then they insist that that’s what everybody does because that’s what THEY do and they live in a bubble. |
Yep, it’s a positive example that affirms OP’s thesis. Additionally, I won’t try to make sense as to why you feel threatened by it. |
I think the word you're looking for is coping. I'd also bet a large percentage of the women who push that on here are childless (and lying about being mothers). |
Yes, I have children now. Had them at 37 and 40. No issues - perhaps I was lucky, But to your other point -God no, if I had a baby with my ex at 27 it would have ruined my life. As I got older, I realized he was not a reliable partner and would have made a terrible husband and father. I would have also not have made the advances I did in my career. |
Many people aren’t having kids at all. No “until.” |
| Met at 26, married at 28, kids at 31 and 33, still going strong at 47. About the only thing we did that OP recommends was that we got an education. |
My male cousin was an unemployed loser throughout his 20s. When he got his now wife pregnant at 27, he immediately went back to college (drop out) and enrolled in a nursing school program. 20 years later he makes like $400,000 in hospital administration. The responsibility and pressure of a child forces men and women grow up. All these childless 20 and 30-something men and women suffer from arrested development. It's an epidemic. Traveling, eating out, boozing, and binging on netflix and reality TV makes you shallow, self-absorbed, immature and narrow-minded. We were literally designed to have children in our 20s. |