I agree that he would probably ignore you and stop talking to you about any of it, but he would still know where you stand, and teaching him that dependable and trustworthy adults don’t lie or ask others to lie on their behalf is more important than getting the details on exactly what’s going on. What if he came home and told you that he was teasing another kid every morning before school and sending nasty text messages. It’s not happening at your house. If you tell him to stop, he’s probably going to keep doing it and just stop telling you about it. You might lose out on some valuable or interesting conversations. Would you tell your middle schooler what to do in that situation? Or would you discuss pros and cons? |
I don’t see that as an analogous situation. If my son is directly engaging in something harmful or mean yes I would tell him to stop. In fact, I’d take his phone away in that example. He knows that’s boys not acceptable. My son wasn’t breaking any of my rules about dating. It’s not my son’s job or my job to enforce other parent’s rules for them. I go back to what others said. If it’s a health and well being issue, then yes you tell the other parent the kid is sneaking around and breaking rules. If not and you learned from your own kid and it would violate their trust when they shared with you, then no. |
This is what my conservative Catholic parents thought. Boy where they wrong. They had no clue that the church youth groups and retreats where great opportunities for raging hormonal teenagers to have sex. Those Catholic youth retreats were so much fun. Lots of praying, food, and sex. You can forbid your children from dating, but it will not stop them from having sex. I can't believe that parents are so naive. Wait until college for dating? HA!
|
DP, but riddle me this one. Suppose the boy's parents drew a line and told the girl's parents, or threatened to. And the boy and girl, behind both of their parents' backs now, continued to date in Romeo and Juliet "we're-doing-this-despite-our-families-because-LOVE" fashion, and then the girl gets pregnant. But now the girl can't go to her parents because she's not even supposed to be dating, and now the boy is also totally cut off from his parents also because of the move you'd have the parents make above and the line you drew in the sand. Throw in a little "btw Roe is in question now" and you have a very unfortunate situation. I'm not saying you're wrong to guide your child in the right direction BUT I don't think you should push your point to the extent where your kid will stop talking to you about things, which is a consequence you fully imagine happening from your advice above. That seems wrong and bad and the consequences may be worse than you are imagining. |
Also I was not asked to lie or lie on anyone’s behalf. I don’t know the girls parents. In some (far fetched) scenario where her parents directly questioned me, of course I would not lie. |
NP. The point… you missed it. |
Believe you meant “bi” |
This raises some questions about how you should handle your child dating someone who isn't allowed to date |
+1 |
Most kids aren’t going to tell their parents if the person they are dating can not unless they trust them and communicate with them. Take as old as time… All kids who are forbidden to date, still do. It amazes me parents truly believe their kids won’t crush or communicate with anyone because you asked them not to. It literally peaks their interest even more. This isn’t an issue where a parent notifies another parent. That is a huge break of trust and ridiculously awkward. |
Not everyone is a ho. My mother told me no dating and I listened. |
Not even close to a good analogy. That was embarrassing |
Slut shaming was for the 80’s sweetie. You listened because no one wanted to date you. |
+1 |
This AGAIN brings up the pressing need to provide condoms! Even if you forbid any dating, provide condoms because it’s easier than dealing with an unwanted teen pregnancy. (even your lesbian daughter in a committed relationship needs condoms available to her, I have been informed). Better safe than sorry when it comes to protection from VD and pregnancy. |