| Good for them |
Given that more than half of teachers and parents agree with me on the importance of continued masking, I hardly think my views make me an outlier. DCUM magnifies a few zealot anti-mask voices but out in the real world things are much different.
|
š |
|
Inspired represents the far end of the very liberal spectrum. For example, I recently reviewed an 8th graderās report card, which uses objective based grading. There was only one objective for Social Studies/History: āI am aware institutional bias limits individuals freedoms.ā (This is paraphrased not a direct quote but pretty close.) If the only thing students are learning about in history class is that systemic racism exists, I am not surprised that they also have adopted a masking policy that is aligned with recent NYT/Pew research that those identifying as very liberal take COVID the most seriously.
(Iām not trying to hijack this thread to be about systemic racism, which certainly exists. But I did think it was strange that the only objective for the course was an acknowledgment of its existence. Math and reading had ~15 skills listed.) |
+1 |
Maybe I am one of the parents you see. I only have one kind of mask in rotation, so itās a KN95 that I throw on for a few minutes so I can show my kids and other kids that while this rule is in effect, adults follow it too. With outdoor masking now optional, I will be without it. But until then, it didnāt seem appropriate to pass along a message that a rule I didnāt like didnāt apply to me. |
The WHO recommends vaccination young children. #wecanallcherrypickfacts |
This was also my approach at a different charter which is going to lift outdoor masking next week. I will no longer be wearing one at pick up. |
| Cases will be rising shortly due to the subvariant. Might as well keep the masks so we donāt need to change course when that happens. |
Same here. Signed another ITDS parent. |
+1. I was willing to comply with the rule for those reasons, but I don't actually think outdoor masking on asymptomatic vaccinated people makes any difference whatsoever. And I think it's very, very silly when people act like it does. But that kind of thing is part of the deal at ITS. |
This isn't something that needs lead time to reinstate. My office has changed policies on this multiple times as rates have changed. You send out an email and keep a couple of boxes around if someone forgets. |
Thirded. We like the school and donāt mind following whatever rules they have in place. Neither do our kids. Now weāll all skip masks outside because itās no longer a rule, and our lives will change in basically zero ways. |
I find this view interesting. So you want to teach your kids to blindly follow rules that make absolutely no sense scientifically according to the actual health officials? I donāt under this from a parenting perspective but I want my kids to be rational and understand when āauthoritiesā are wrong. As they often are⦠|
Yes, I do. That's part of living in a civil society. We're not "blindly" following the rules. We're choosing to follow them for various reasons that make sense to us. Not everything is about science, some of it is about social relationships and the social contract. We all sometimes follow rules that we don't think are scientifically sensible and that some actual heath officials dislike. Probably some rules that you think are super important and well-founded, other people think are stupid. I teach my kids to pick their battles and take a stand when it is truly important, and that in general they should follow the rules unless they have a compelling reason. And I don't want every random person making their own scientific judgments. |