NP here. I was 20 and my husband 22 when we met. Married at 22 and 24. I wasn’t the same person at 25 I was at 30, and I’m not the same in my 40s as I was at 30 or 25. Neither is my husband. We’re lucky that we’ve grown together, and have worked together to be where we are and who we are. I’d probably a different person today had I married later in life, but I’m very happy with who I am and with who my spouse is-still. Marriage is a leap of faith no matter how old one is when you make it. |
It really isn't. But I'll take the advice of someone in their 60s/70s vs someone in their 40s |
| 18 and 22. Happily married 3 kids |
+1 |
+2 |
Marriage isn't a leap of faith unless you are a nitwit. Which if you got married at 35 or younger you just might be. |
I agree with PP's point that marriage is a leap of faith no matter what age you get married: People change. You are committing to a person that really isn't going to be the same over the decades no matter what age you start. You are committing to the unknown. People get divorced because "I changed" and if you don't go into marriage knowing you each will change, you're not getting it. 60's/ met at 18/19, married at 22/23. |
It's not a leap of faith and that has nothing to do with your partner changing. But I wouldn't expect a nitwit to understand that. |
+3 Yes, it’s a leap of faith. Spouse and I met at 19/21, and are happily married 20 years later. Also, my parents met at age 21 and have been happily married for 55 years. And my spouses parents met in elementary school, started dating in middle school, and are happily married and in their mid 70s. |
I think pps are saying that people do change and this is unavoidable. In a successful marriage you work towards growing together, not apart, over the years. No matter when you marry, though, you are taking a leap of faith by hoping you and your partner are able to weather storms together and make the effort to love another complex, ever changing and growing person. If your partner changing over the course of the relationship has “nothing to do with it” is it your opinion that there is some way you can know the person your partner will be in 20 or 40 years and what your marriage will look like? Why do you feel that at age 35+ you would have certainty around this? |
What is your problem? Putting aside everything that’s wrong with your implicit analysis that assumes that both people and the circumstances that shape people stay static, what is your problem? |
The whole people change excuse is what people say for staying with an asshole. People really don't change that much. That's a fact. Saying marriage is a leap of faith is like calling your spouse your best friend, someone you in awe of your most foundational person etc, utter BS and fairytales Grown ups who don't engage in magiacal Disney thinking do not think or speak this way. |
My problem is I get tired of the bullcrap spewed here. MAriage is a choice full stop. It's not a leap of faith or whatever othe rmagical bullshit you are or someone else is trying to sell. |
If your spouse is an idiot at 52 the odds are they were an idiot at 22, but maybe you just didn't notice it because you were too young. No bonus points for staying with an idiot. If they aren't an idiot at 52 they likely weren't at 22 and hey you got lucky. Nothing to do with faith. You magical romantic types are insufferable. |
You aren't part of those relationships so you can't say how happy they really are. All you can say is they have been married X amount of years, you don't know what that all entails, you can only speak for yourself. |