Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so assuming the roommate was trans and he was in a relationship with this person what are the implications of that?

It could be the motive. Shooter had a trans gf and went off the deep end bc he didn’t like what Charlie had to say about affirming gender.

Well Charlie knew that risk and accepted it. He said gun deaths were acceptable.

Not sure what your point is? He wouldn’t have changed his stance on the second amendment over this. He wasn’t afraid to die. Have you watched any of his videos?

Wrong. Conservatives don't care about a thing until it directly affects them. And that's when the smart, non-crazy ones wake up.

Then again you could be right and Charlie Kirk was crazy?

[Anonymous]

Groypers are alt-right incels obsessed with being antisocial. These guys say things like, "it's gay to have sex with a woman." So no—having a trans roommate doesn't make Robinson a leftist. In fact, it solidifies the idea that he is a right wing fuentes/Loomer acolyte.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A Virginia anesthesiologist was fired after making "highly inappropriate comments supporting violence" against Charlie Kirk following his assassination, according to Riverside Walter Reed Hospital. The employee's contract was terminated by North American Partners in Anesthesia.

Hmmm another one of these articles that doesn’t actually include the post in question.

The employer in that article didn’t release the anesthesiologist’s name.

But here’s a different anesthesiologist who said she is glad Charlie Kirk got himself shot. She is not a bot.

When Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, some conservatives openly celebrated her passing. A right-wing commentator called her a “mass murdering hag” who had “ruined more lives than Hitler, Mao & Stalin combined.” Another conservative pastor framed her death as “celestially ordained” and proclaimed, “This belongs to God.” Gordon Klingenschmitt, an evangelical activist and former Republican lawmaker, said he mourned only that she “apparently did not know Christ,” making clear he saw her death as spiritually justified. Even within Republican circles, Trump aides were quoted privately saying her death was “super” in terms of political impact, treating her passing less as a tragedy and more as an opportunity.

Unclear if the above examples are public figures with large followers base, a show, income from it, etc. Or just a little jerk from podunk online.

As you know, with the internet, everyone and anyone can post whatever. And opinions are like a-holes, everyone’s got one.

So what's your point, not following.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Groypers are alt-right incels obsessed with being antisocial. These guys say things like, "it's gay to have sex with a woman." So no—having a trans roommate doesn't make Robinson a leftist. In fact, it solidifies the idea that he is a right wing fuentes/Loomer acolyte.

Just stop, you know this isn’t true.

[Anonymous]

350+ pages, most are which consists of posts trying to convince everyone that the shooter was far right MAGA.

And like most of the lies told by the Democrat left, this one is now going down in flames.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:best explanation of the shooter (on tiktok, I know) but...

https://www.tiktok.com/@aidanetcetera/video/7549640789652032790?_r=1&_t=ZT-8zhpr2DUTxP

Can’t access tt

I can't either... but to think some rando on tiktok has the inside scoop and has it all figured out is of course complete nonsense.

It wasn't an inside scoop. It was an explanation of the casing messages and the sub-culture the shooter lived in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?”

The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically. The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself.

It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question. Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left?

Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat. Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.

Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.

Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.

You're missing the forest for the trees. There's a picture of this boy at 10 years old being gifted a suped up desktop computer his parents presumably gave him full access to. It is a safe bet this nerdy autistic but natively very smart and handsome kid spent the last 12 years becoming addicted to porn, gore, and falling down dark rabbit holes. The internet, including Discord chat rooms, social media, and porn, needs to be severely restricted to all kids under 18. I'd argue porn should be banned from the internet in general.

This was a smart handsome boy who should be finishing up an engineering degree, instead he falls off the track after only one semester of college? The red flags were evident 4 years ago. That's not normal for a boy with a near perfect ACT and 4.0 to quit college -- unless it's to move to SF because you founded a tech start-up.

As for 'mental health,' it's a bit early for you to speculate, isn't it? Maybe he was getting care for 'mental health,' which too often in this country is loading up teen kids with Xanax, SSRIs, and Adderall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Groypers are alt-right incels obsessed with being antisocial. These guys say things like, "it's gay to have sex with a woman." So no—having a trans roommate doesn't make Robinson a leftist. In fact, it solidifies the idea that he is a right wing fuentes/Loomer acolyte.

Just stop, you know this isn’t true.

This is the new right wing comeback now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Which is why nobody really GAF about the faux outrage over a trans being involved with this case. An indoctrinated far-right shooter shot two high school kids the same day. Too many guns in this country. No attention being paid to mental health.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so assuming the roommate was trans and he was in a relationship with this person what are the implications of that?

It could be the motive. Shooter had a trans gf and went off the deep end bc he didn’t like what Charlie had to say about affirming gender.

Well Charlie knew that risk and accepted it. He said gun deaths were acceptable.

Not sure what your point is? He wouldn’t have changed his stance on the second amendment over this. He wasn’t afraid to die. Have you watched any of his videos?

So his widow and babies are fine with this? As long as the 2nd amendment is upheld. Was Charlie suicidal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Groypers are alt-right incels obsessed with being antisocial. These guys say things like, "it's gay to have sex with a woman." So no—having a trans roommate doesn't make Robinson a leftist. In fact, it solidifies the idea that he is a right wing fuentes/Loomer acolyte.

Just stop, you know this isn’t true.

Google Nick Fuentes and catboykami

100% true. There is a whole subculture around this, and the shooter was absolutely part of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?”

The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically. The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself.

It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question. Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left?

Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat. Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.

Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.

Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.

Charlie Kirk didn’t think highly of empathy.

In the context of prosecuting repeat offenders. Releasing them has been a massively failed experiment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so assuming the roommate was trans and he was in a relationship with this person what are the implications of that?

It could be the motive. Shooter had a trans gf and went off the deep end bc he didn’t like what Charlie had to say about affirming gender.

Well Charlie knew that risk and accepted it. He said gun deaths were acceptable.

Not sure what your point is? He wouldn’t have changed his stance on the second amendment over this. He wasn’t afraid to die. Have you watched any of his videos?

So his widow and babies are fine with this? As long as the 2nd amendment is upheld. Was Charlie suicidal?

Yes, they may be actually. The right is so loyal that they will not abandon their causes even after tragedies that are due to causes they advocate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk takes down an anti-gay extremist:

Wow I did not expect this.

I can’t say I agreed with any thing Charlie has said but I do agree with this.

Thank you for sharing.

That is very Charlie Kirk. I’m so sorry you are learning this just now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the young woman who was stabbed on the train? Is that also sad? What about that murderer? Is he trans too?

Well the unqualified NC judge that released the criminal for the 15th time will be fired.

And the druggie 15x released criminal will be back in the dole in prison for life

The European woman pocket-knifed to death on the NC subway bled out and died.

The five witnesses to the attack, sitting 0-2 rows from it, ignored the thug and the dying victim. Some even moved to a farther seat after they let him waltz off the subway at the next stop.

Is he still at large?

So that’s a wrap. America 2025.

You forgot about the Republican district attorney that this all happened under.

He hasn't been a DA during all the 15 years this criminal was repeatedly released to harm others, and NC magistrates can make decisions that allow such criminals to be free.

+1. Once Briner is governor he’ll bring Nc into the 21st century like he has for the treasury dept there.