Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Which is why nobody really GAF about the faux outrage over a trans being involved with this case. An indoctrinated far-right shooter shot two high school kids the same day. Too many guns in this country. No attention being paid to mental health.

Mental health and gun control are two different topics. Not all or most who harm or kill with guns are mentally ill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Groypers are alt-right incels obsessed with being antisocial. These guys say things like, "it's gay to have sex with a woman." So no—having a trans roommate doesn't make Robinson a leftist. In fact, it solidifies the idea that he is a right wing fuentes/Loomer acolyte.

I'm a poster who has made several comments calling out the BS with respect to the "transgender roommate" thread (at least with what we know of a this time, only one source, a Fox News personality who has been picked up by numerous Murdoch owned publications with no other corroboration). That said, the Groyper angle is just as disingenuous, while some of gaming aspects of the etchings are Groyper-adjacent, without more info, it's just that: Groyper-adjacent. Could easily be a 4chan/8chan dweeb that wanted to get "internet famous." It's all too nebulous right now and the stuff that is leaking is coming from people with agendas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so assuming the roommate was trans and he was in a relationship with this person what are the implications of that?

It could be the motive. Shooter had a trans gf and went off the deep end bc he didn’t like what Charlie had to say about affirming gender.

Well Charlie knew that risk and accepted it. He said gun deaths were acceptable.

Not sure what your point is? He wouldn’t have changed his stance on the second amendment over this. He wasn’t afraid to die. Have you watched any of his videos?

So his widow and babies are fine with this? As long as the 2nd amendment is upheld. Was Charlie suicidal?

^^ his children will only have photos and video to remember him. But as long as we still have the right to own firearms. The kids don’t need their dad, he died a true hero, that’s what’s truly important here. I’m sure if Charlie was given a second chance at life he would choose the same path. s/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:350+ pages, most are which consists of posts trying to convince everyone that the shooter was far right MAGA.

And like most of the lies told by the Democrat left, this one is now going down in flames.

This post uses a few recognizable rhetorical strategies:

1. **Dismissive framing** – “350+ pages” is used not to engage with arguments but to belittle the effort, portraying it as excessive and misguided.

2. **Ad hominem/generalization** – By labeling it “lies told by the Democrat left,” the writer doesn’t address evidence but attacks a whole political group, suggesting dishonesty is inherent to them.

3. **Triumphalist language** – “Going down in flames” is a metaphor meant to suggest total defeat of the opposing narrative, regardless of whether the facts support that claim.

4. **False dichotomy** – The framing implies only two options exist: either the shooter was “far right MAGA” (supposedly disproven) or the opposing claim (left-wing radicalization) must be true. That leaves no room for complexity.

So, this is an example of **partisan polemic rhetoric**, heavy on ridicule, exaggeration, and group-label attacks, rather than evidence-based argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A Virginia anesthesiologist was fired after making "highly inappropriate comments supporting violence" against Charlie Kirk following his assassination, according to Riverside Walter Reed Hospital. The employee's contract was terminated by North American Partners in Anesthesia.

Hmmm another one of these articles that doesn’t actually include the post in question.

The employer in that article didn’t release the anesthesiologist’s name.

But here’s a different anesthesiologist who said she is glad Charlie Kirk got himself shot. She is not a bot.

When Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, some conservatives openly celebrated her passing. A right-wing commentator called her a “mass murdering hag” who had “ruined more lives than Hitler, Mao & Stalin combined.” Another conservative pastor framed her death as “celestially ordained” and proclaimed, “This belongs to God.” Gordon Klingenschmitt, an evangelical activist and former Republican lawmaker, said he mourned only that she “apparently did not know Christ,” making clear he saw her death as spiritually justified. Even within Republican circles, Trump aides were quoted privately saying her death was “super” in terms of political impact, treating her passing less as a tragedy and more as an opportunity.

Wow 😲😳 what a total psycho. She doesn't speak like an educated doctor. I hope she is never ever able to find another job. Who the heck wants her to put them under? Shes unhinged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Which is why nobody really GAF about the faux outrage over a trans being involved with this case. An indoctrinated far-right shooter shot two high school kids the same day. Too many guns in this country. No attention being paid to mental health.

Mental health and gun control are two different topics. Not all or most who harm or kill with guns are mentally ill.

But mental illness can develop, one may purchase a gun with a sound mind but then become ill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Which is why nobody really GAF about the faux outrage over a trans being involved with this case. An indoctrinated far-right shooter shot two high school kids the same day. Too many guns in this country. No attention being paid to mental health.

Mental health and gun control are two different topics. Not all or most who harm or kill with guns are mentally ill.

They are interrelated given the state of violence in this country. It's beyond disingenuous to care about trans being involved with CK while ignoring that the far-right was involved with the Colorado high school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Groypers are alt-right incels obsessed with being antisocial. These guys say things like, "it's gay to have sex with a woman." So no—having a trans roommate doesn't make Robinson a leftist. In fact, it solidifies the idea that he is a right wing fuentes/Loomer acolyte.

Just stop, you know this isn’t true.

This is the new right wing comeback now?

Some people aren’t worth debating. They are too far out there to bother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time the left wants to pretend that they are so morally virtuous and superior to the rest society, we should remind people how they celebrated a man’s assassination. Celebrating a person’s death is abhorrent (unless it’s someone like Osama bin Laden, who murdered people.)

Did you forget how the right including Trump reacted to the attack on Pelosi's husband, or didn't care? It was acceptable because he did not die so a cracked skull was funny?

Pelosi quack killer- another example, this time a Canadian, with a history of drug abuse, mental illness, delusions plus chronic social media user.

The attack almost killed Paul Pelosi and left him in the hospital for some time.

The right wing mocked it and came up with all kinds of false and horrible jokes and conspiracy theories.

Maybe the left should do the same, come up with nonstop cruel jokes about Charlie Kirk and you're going to just have to accept it, because that's what you do to everyone else.

Either that or fix your broken selves and do better.

Yes that was horrible.

Pls post the mocking. I only saw sympathy and shock.

Maybe I need to cultivate more of your feeds, who do you follow that you saw whatever you saw?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so assuming the roommate was trans and he was in a relationship with this person what are the implications of that?

It could be the motive. Shooter had a trans gf and went off the deep end bc he didn’t like what Charlie had to say about affirming gender.

Well Charlie knew that risk and accepted it. He said gun deaths were acceptable.

Not sure what your point is? He wouldn’t have changed his stance on the second amendment over this. He wasn’t afraid to die. Have you watched any of his videos?

So his widow and babies are fine with this? As long as the 2nd amendment is upheld. Was Charlie suicidal?

Yes, they may be actually. The right is so loyal that they will not abandon their causes even after tragedies that are due to causes they advocate.

Well, it’s a shame for his kids. Suicidal people probably shouldn’t have kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

Ehhh, not a very good reply there. You're saying that school shootings are so normalized as to be irrelevant to any discourse. This is the very environment that CK was part of creating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time the left wants to pretend that they are so morally virtuous and superior to the rest society, we should remind people how they celebrated a man’s assassination. Celebrating a person’s death is abhorrent (unless it’s someone like Osama bin Laden, who murdered people.)

Did you forget how the right including Trump reacted to the attack on Pelosi's husband, or didn't care? It was acceptable because he did not die so a cracked skull was funny?

Pelosi quack killer- another example, this time a Canadian, with a history of drug abuse, mental illness, delusions plus chronic social media user.

The attack almost killed Paul Pelosi and left him in the hospital for some time.

The right wing mocked it and came up with all kinds of false and horrible jokes and conspiracy theories.

Maybew the left should do the same, come up with nonstop cruel jokes about Charlie Kirk and you're going to just have to accept it, because that's what you do to everyone else.

Either that or fix your broken selves and do better.

The left’s peons and nobodies already have. Here and elsewhere.
It’s quick and easy to see on all platforms and this thread.

Many NPCs couldn’t stop themselves from posting distasteful, inhumane, smiling posts or selfies or videos.

The left’s figureheads expressed shock and sympathy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

So you want to give THIS story more attention so other troubled young men participate in political violence? Or what do you want?

[Anonymous]

This article from 2016 is pretty prophetic for where we are now:

https://www.vox.com/culture/2016/12/14/13576192/alt-right-sexism-recruitment