
We don't - but considering their claims that they want Archie to have a normal childhood, it's very difficult to look at their living arrangements and say to yourself - yeah, that's what normal looks like. |
+1,000 I mean, really people! DUH! |
I think this is exactly the context, which doesn't make it ok. I got the impression that that comment, and other's reactions to it, was a big part of the failure to acknowledge racism playing a role in what was going on. And it definitely contributed to Harry's decision to leave. I'm sure I'm not adding anything new, but I definitely got the impression that there were a lot of things proposed that supposedly had a completely legitimate purpose. Not giving Archie title, for instance. |
Overly dramatic self-centered millennials. Exhausting. |
NP. Not that, disappointed in not correcting the "Meghan made Kate cry" story that unleashed a racist mob against her because how dare she attack their perfect white princess. |
Kate turned out to have been a fine judge of character, especially after listening to Meghan’s whining yesterday. |
I also think that the baby conversation could have very easily been Charles or whoever just idly wondering - "well I wonder who the baby will look like. Do you think he will be light like Harry or dark like Meghan?"
And it's not like Meghan is very dark, either. I still don't get what the "concern" over Archie's color would have been like. I mean he'd come out however he'd come out, nothing to be done about it. |
Yeah but translate this to the American world for a minute. You're in a wealthy Catholic family and you marry a Jewish woman. The family wonders if your child will be raised Catholic and to pre-empt the answer cuts you out of the will and refuses to let your child use their last name. That's the analogy here. Still wealthy or not, you wouldn't have a problem with that? |
+2 And zero evidence Kate was awful to her. Who knows what the bridezilla encounter was about. All insinuations, no receipts. |
So Meghan’s best friend is married to the son of the ex-Canadian Prime Minister and she admits she was already friends with Eugenie and then wants us to believe she had no knowledge of Harry and his family? And then, despite the fact the most certainly would understand the rules of succession by now, is claiming that Archie wasn’t given a title that he was never going to receive based on the rules of succession anyhow? Two clear lies and she wants us to believe everything else she says with no clear references or receipts? This is what makes me so skeptical of her and what makes her so hard to believe about anything else. |
Pro tip. It was never funny to some of us. We just were guilted/dismissed/threatened to keep our mouths shut |
Megan can still be a Narcissist however. |
That's not the comparison at all. Archie would never have been prince. Harry knows this. They are just using this as a bone to throw to uneducated American viewership. |
You and Kate are positively twinsies! Not that anyone would know because you are both so reserved, and seek to stay out of the spotlight by keeping off social media. |
Americans don’t understand the rules of succession. Wait until this airs in the UK, and this nonsense about Archie not being a Prince because he's black comes out. Do your research. I guess King Henry V should have predicted this when he laid out the rules of succession 100 years ago? Eduardo kids don’t even have titles!!! The entitlement. Unbelievable. |