Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

[Anonymous]

People were talking about Diana and security in the last thread, she declined it. Not sure it’s fair to blame the firm for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for poor Archie and his little sister. They're going to watch this interview and all the reactions to it, when they're older. Poor kids, a lot of the private stuff should remain private, should have remained private.

I disagree. He'll see first and foremost what his father did to protect his mother and their children.

Harry and Meghan were both pretty circumspect about the worst things. If they'd really wanted to dish on the BRF, so they could have said so much more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In these years of Cancel culture, it’s interesting that 100 years of holding on to the monarchy.... this might be the end.

Oh please, the monarchy is not coming to an end because of something an American gold digger who feels snubbed said to Oprah (and Oprah clearly didn't believe it).

They are running out of money and Charles will run it into the ground with his tramp.

[Anonymous]

What BRF needs is a culture change. Just like work culture needs to be shaken up... their mistake for so long was a lack of love. The queen chose that path because she has been afraid or maybe is unable to feel. The pressure she has carries since a child may have left her cold. My mom is like this, the oldest of many many children. She doesn’t share emotion, except anger. She never apologizes or talks about feelings.

You can’t change someone like that whose trauma is so old.

But if William has any heart he and Kate will change the culture.

Last, they need to clear house on a lot of staff; however that comes with risks. ...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

I think she came across badly when she said she had done no research on TRF, British history of TRF, or the British press. It came across as being disinterested about the whole thing and then complaining when it doesn't turn out to be just like "being a celebrity" in the U.S. Like, why wouldn't she watch the Princess Diana interviews, at least?

[Anonymous]

It's very easy to take a conversation about a future baby's skin color and turn into "concern". I mean why would you be concerned about something you have no power to influence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?

I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dear dcumers, you are so totally naive and blind.
Here is what is happening here, and it is plain and simple.

Harry blames the RBF for his mother's death, and before that, he blames them for how it was handled. He blames his dad and his grandma for all of it.
And they are to blame!
He is out for revenge, and he is taking them down.
You know the same way most of the dcum cuts off their parents and families cause they are toxic? Stop being hypocrites here; BRF is toxic; if they were your family, you would cut them off.
Also, it seems that Harry is not a spineless twit, regardless of what he might sound like. He is out for blood and blood he is getting. Why should he and Meghan take it quietly and be a good sport about it? Think about it, they crucified his mother, and for what? For wanting to have a real marriage and not turning a blind eye? Watch the documentary on Disney+, in her own words. What was done to Diana is nothing short of criminal behavior.
I, for one, am proud of him.

Diana died because she got in a car with a drunk driver and chose not to wear a seatbelt.

If she had remained under royal protection, she would never have got in that car.

And if she never married Charles, she wouldn’t have been chased by paparazzi. Most people understand that, if you let yourself be driven by a drunk driver and choose not to wear a seatbelt, you could die. Sadly, that fact of life applies to everyone, even beautiful princesses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Harry (6th in line) single handedly end the monarchy?

I'm convinced Kate and William are going to have a 4th child after this interview to push him down to #7

But the real question is will they teach their fourth baby to be as racist as they are? Only time will tell...

[Anonymous]

Harry seems to be in depression. Facial and body language tells all. I'll repeat that if anyone seems to have potential for suicide, it's him. Predict he will have a breakdown of significant proportion with tragic results.

His mother's death, his toxic family history has been the foundation, and now coupled with his wife telling the world how much pain her marriage to him has caused her, and indirectly their son, probably is overwhelming him with guilt.

He should be the one on suicide watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

I think she came across badly when she said she had done no research on TRF, British history of TRF, or the British press. It came across as being disinterested about the whole thing and then complaining when it doesn't turn out to be just like "being a celebrity" in the U.S. Like, why wouldn't she watch the Princess Diana interviews, at least?

Yes, she accepted the title without knowing or accepting what the job would entail? I feel for her on many levels but find it unbelievable that she could have done NO research before going into this, as she claimed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Harry (6th in line) single handedly end the monarchy?

I'm convinced Kate and William are going to have a 4th child after this interview to push him down to #7

But the real question is will they teach their fourth baby to be as racist as they are? Only time will tell...

What will happen to Charlotte and Louis? Will they also be streamlined out of the Royal family?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.

You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?

I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.

She also talked in the interview about how no one tried to prep or train her on anything and she would stay up all night learning anthems and songs and the right way to do things and the right way to say things to try to make them proud.

[Anonymous]

One of the biggest questions coming out of this interview is whether it was Charles or William who expressed concern about Archie's skin color. I'm curious to see how they react/defend themselves. Really curious to see if staff loyal to one or the other will leak to the press in defense of their person. IOW, will we see some kind of jockeying between the two houses to not get pegged with the single most damaging revelation of the interview. (Meghan said revealing the identity would be very damaging, so I think that pretty much limits the possibilities to Charles or William, as no one would be surprised if Phillip said it.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Harry (6th in line) single handedly end the monarchy?

I'm convinced Kate and William are going to have a 4th child after this interview to push him down to #7

But the real question is will they teach their fourth baby to be as racist as they are? Only time will tell...

They can't. Royal babies cost too much money. There were already questions when they had a 3rd. Take a look at all the other royals - the Queen's children only have 2 a piece and the Queen's grandchildren only have 2 a piece (except Kate).

You think that's a coincidence? Some magical combination of infertility and only liking two kids that affected 12 different couples?