Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
PP-who-posted-the-facts here. Microaggressions is a meritless accusation because it's an entirely subjective experience on the part of the person who feels offended. Every time someone make a generalized observation (i.e. stereotype) of some sort, it may be offensive to someone somewhere. The person making the observation has no control over whether someone's feelings may be hurt by it even if there was no intent or any ready indication that the observation may hurt other people's feelings. You also need to look up the definition of racism, because "making generalized observations based on skin color" is not it. |
|
PP here. Discrimination is common and pervasive, it is irrational to think that it can be eliminated in any meaningful manner. However, I do want to point out that our laws and government must not discriminate. To the extent that systemic racism exists, such as legalized slavery, Jim Crow laws, and more recent policies of affirmative action, we must work to eliminate these racist discriminatory laws and government behaviors. |
+1 |
I don't know why you guys feel this way. Some of the most popular comedians make fun of these types of people: Bill Burr, Dave Chapelle, Chris Rock, and the late Patrice O'Neal. |
Yeah, comedians, if anything, seem to target everyone except Asians. |
PP here, the one comedian that I can think of that make a lot of fun of Asians is Russell Peters, himself an Asian. He is a lot funnier than other Asian comedians who tend to focus on SJW issues rather than cultural stereotypes - which is the thing that's actually funny. |
The Asian-American TJ kids who come from parents who grew up in America are some of the most well-adjusted, community-oriented kids you'll find there. You wouldn't find the toxic culture if the overwhelming majority of the Asian-American students were from these types of families. The first-gen kids are going to become those parents later on once they realize the crap that our parents put them through. It's really amazing to see the difference. |
You have no idea what you're talking about - comparing apples to oranges. Yes comedians make fun of all types of people just to be edgy. But these comedians have pretty much stopped saying the N word for African Americans, the R word when referring to the disabled and the f word when talking about homosexuals. But it's open game on Asians when it comes to the bad accents, squinting, and even the c word for some of them. Go watch any of Joe Rogan's crew (Kill Tony (Hinchcliffe), Bert Kreischer, Tom Segura, Ari Shaffir, Andrew Santino, Joey Diaz, etc.) and it's a regular bit with them. Most of them defended Shane Gillis after he was fired from SNL for saying racist things about Chinese Americans. They use "friends" like Bobby Lee as cover to get away with it. This isn't about right or wrong, or virtue signaling - it's simply stating that Asians are not treated the same as any other group, even in comedy. |
It seems to be a common theme with many first generation immigrants from all races, a drive to succeed and overcome. It could be any first generation immigrant, I think we just notice it more with Asians, because there are more Asians overall. The further we get from our original culture, the more similar we all become. |
I have not witnessed this. |
You do have control. You can choose to not say those things then no one will be offended. Curiously do you think there is a equity problem at TJ that needs to be corrected? Are you a supporter of Brabrand and the school board on this TJ lottery proposal? |
By definition the person making the microaggression is not aware of it. How do you propose that someone control what they say, when they don't even know who will be offended? But this is merely a practical matter. The philosophical matter is that offending someone is part and parcel of any intellectual exchange. The very nature of an argument is that each side thinks the other side is wrong, an idea that is in and of itself offensive. The problem of equity is, like microaggression, an irrational expectation that runs counter to human nature. People are different from each other, families are different, villages are different, cultures are different. These differences underly different choices, which result in different outcomes, which we label as "privilege". It is immoral to suggest that "equity" is a worthwhile pursuit, because it requires that the outcomes be the same regardless of differences in choices. History has shown that the most reliable way to improve the lives of the general population is to maximize the variety of choices that they can make. From the first days of industrialization to the modern day has seen a huge explosion in the variety of specialized trade that someone can train themselves in. This has increased opportunities and made it increasingly likely that someone can find the niche that maximize their value to society. Equity is the enemy of diversity, effort, and reward. |
Yes, I agree. Many neighborhood privates are something like 75% White. Nysmith, Potomac, St. Stephen's, etc. Granted, they are private, but we don't hear any outcry about such a racial profile. The reason it is different for TJ is because it is indeed majority Asian and there is a tinge of "they cheated to get there," "they spend tens of thousands of dollars prepping," "they are forcing a cut-throat environment" type of stereotyping. "They" meaning Asians. This is racial bias. Cheaters, preppers, and cut-throat environments are everywhere. Go look at the reviews of any highly ranked school in the county in Niche and you will see this. |
True, cheaters and preppers are everywhere and viewed with the same disdain. I think we are focusing on TJ because it’s affecting us, by us I mean every child in this area. Who knows what’s happening somewhere in Idaho or Wisconsin? Who cares? I think, for some reason, Asians are taking this as a personal assault, when that isn’t the intention. |