Jussie Smollett attacked

[Anonymous]

The guy isn’t mentally ill, he’s simply a run of the mill moron.

[Anonymous]

I didn’t believe this guy from the brig inning but you have to keep those comments to yourself or else you’re a racist and anti LGBT.

Yes I voted for trump, no I’m not racist and I love the gays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Yep. Amazing and pathetic, especially those who were hoping against hope that his story was true so they could keep up the "evil MAGA" angle.

DP. Yes. It’s not just that so many jumped the gun, trumpeting a very dubious story and lending it credibility. It’s also that they insisted on trying to use it as proof of a broader claim about how racist and terrible half of America is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Actually the Jackie hoax was really not plausible. I was the second poster on DCUM to express doubt over her story and the other poster and I were relentlessly attacked for it.

Yeah. I was one of the early posters to notice the red flags in that story and was repeatedly called a misogynist and worse, despite the fact that I’m a lifelong feminist.

People hold on so tight to these victimhood narratives; they don’t want to let facts get in the way.

[Anonymous]

I posted this on the JS thread on the political forum. He is denying that he paid the men $3500 to stage this.

https://pagesix.com/2019/02/16/jussie-smollett-hires-michael-cohens-criminal-defense-lawyer/
Jussie Smollett hires Michael Cohen’s criminal defense lawyer

Jussie Smollett has hired Michael Cohen’s criminal defense lawyer, the attorney confirmed this week, amid the deepening mystery of the “Empire” actor’s claim that he was the victim of a hate attack.

“Yes, at the moment, I am,” Michael Monico, a former federal prosecutor in Illinois’ Northern District, told WGN’s “The Roe Conn Show” on Thursday.

Monico did not say how long he’s been representing Smollett, or in what capacity.

Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, hired Monico to his defense team last month to represent him as he faces federal charges that he violated campaign finance laws and lied to Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Actually the Jackie hoax was really not plausible. I was the second poster on DCUM to express doubt over her story and the other poster and I were relentlessly attacked for it.

Yeah. I was one of the early posters to notice the red flags in that story and was repeatedly called a misogynist and worse, despite the fact that I’m a lifelong feminist.

People hold on so tight to these victimhood narratives; they don’t want to let facts get in the way.

You are a terrible person and even seem to take some perverse pride in it. You realize that YOU are the reason why it’s difficult for many real rape victims to come forward. GTH.

If you are not the police investigating the crime then STFU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Actually the Jackie hoax was really not plausible. I was the second poster on DCUM to express doubt over her story and the other poster and I were relentlessly attacked for it.

Yeah. I was one of the early posters to notice the red flags in that story and was repeatedly called a misogynist and worse, despite the fact that I’m a lifelong feminist.

People hold on so tight to these victimhood narratives; they don’t want to let facts get in the way.

You are a terrible person and even seem to take some perverse pride in it. You realize that YOU are the reason why it’s difficult for many real rape victims to come forward. GTH.

If you are not the police investigating the crime then STFU.

I wish you understood how badly these tragic hoaxes hurt real victims (in addition to needlessly fomenting nationwide division). They cause unimaginable amounts of harm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the JS thread on the political forum. He is denying that he paid the men $3500 to stage this.

https://pagesix.com/2019/02/16/jussie-smollett-hires-michael-cohens-criminal-defense-lawyer/
Jussie Smollett hires Michael Cohen’s criminal defense lawyer

Jussie Smollett has hired Michael Cohen’s criminal defense lawyer, the attorney confirmed this week, amid the deepening mystery of the “Empire” actor’s claim that he was the victim of a hate attack.

“Yes, at the moment, I am,” Michael Monico, a former federal prosecutor in Illinois’ Northern District, told WGN’s “The Roe Conn Show” on Thursday.

Monico did not say how long he’s been representing Smollett, or in what capacity.

Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, hired Monico to his defense team last month to represent him as he faces federal charges that he violated campaign finance laws and lied to Congress.

I think that’s why Smollet’s most recent statement said that he was paying these guys for physical training. It’s so he has a legit explanation for any money he gave them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Actually the Jackie hoax was really not plausible. I was the second poster on DCUM to express doubt over her story and the other poster and I were relentlessly attacked for it.

Yeah. I was one of the early posters to notice the red flags in that story and was repeatedly called a misogynist and worse, despite the fact that I’m a lifelong feminist.

People hold on so tight to these victimhood narratives; they don’t want to let facts get in the way.

You are a terrible person and even seem to take some perverse pride in it. You realize that YOU are the reason why it’s difficult for many real rape victims to come forward. GTH.

If you are not the police investigating the crime then STFU.

I wish you understood how badly these tragic hoaxes hurt real victims (in addition to needlessly fomenting nationwide division). They cause unimaginable amounts of harm.

Good thing they are so infrequent.

If you are not the police, STFU and keep your opinions/doubts to yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted this on the JS thread on the political forum. He is denying that he paid the men $3500 to stage this.

https://pagesix.com/2019/02/16/jussie-smollett-hires-michael-cohens-criminal-defense-lawyer/
Jussie Smollett hires Michael Cohen’s criminal defense lawyer

Jussie Smollett has hired Michael Cohen’s criminal defense lawyer, the attorney confirmed this week, amid the deepening mystery of the “Empire” actor’s claim that he was the victim of a hate attack.

“Yes, at the moment, I am,” Michael Monico, a former federal prosecutor in Illinois’ Northern District, told WGN’s “The Roe Conn Show” on Thursday.

Monico did not say how long he’s been representing Smollett, or in what capacity.

Cohen, President Trump’s former personal attorney, hired Monico to his defense team last month to represent him as he faces federal charges that he violated campaign finance laws and lied to Congress.

I think that’s why Smollet’s most recent statement said that he was paying these guys for physical training. It’s so he has a legit explanation for any money he gave them.

ahhh

makes total sense!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Actually the Jackie hoax was really not plausible. I was the second poster on DCUM to express doubt over her story and the other poster and I were relentlessly attacked for it.

Yeah. I was one of the early posters to notice the red flags in that story and was repeatedly called a misogynist and worse, despite the fact that I’m a lifelong feminist.

People hold on so tight to these victimhood narratives; they don’t want to let facts get in the way.

You are a terrible person and even seem to take some perverse pride in it. You realize that YOU are the reason why it’s difficult for many real rape victims to come forward. GTH.

If you are not the police investigating the crime then STFU.

I wish you understood how badly these tragic hoaxes hurt real victims (in addition to needlessly fomenting nationwide division). They cause unimaginable amounts of harm.

Good thing they are so infrequent.

If you are not the police, STFU and keep your opinions/doubts to yourself.

People speaking the truth aren’t going to shut up just because reality happens to conflict with your worldview. The sooner you internalize that lesson, the better off you’ll be.

[Anonymous]

No one seems to have critical thinking skills anymore. People react before they think. No analysis of sources, no patience to wait for the facts to be revealed. Just emotional reactions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Actually the Jackie hoax was really not plausible. I was the second poster on DCUM to express doubt over her story and the other poster and I were relentlessly attacked for it.

Yeah. I was one of the early posters to notice the red flags in that story and was repeatedly called a misogynist and worse, despite the fact that I’m a lifelong feminist.

People hold on so tight to these victimhood narratives; they don’t want to let facts get in the way.

You are a terrible person and even seem to take some perverse pride in it. You realize that YOU are the reason why it’s difficult for many real rape victims to come forward. GTH.

If you are not the police investigating the crime then STFU.

I wish you understood how badly these tragic hoaxes hurt real victims (in addition to needlessly fomenting nationwide division). They cause unimaginable amounts of harm.

Good thing they are so infrequent.

If you are not the police, STFU and keep your opinions/doubts to yourself.

You’re obviously an angry imbecile. The problem we have as a society is that idiots like yourself are too stupid to realize they’re idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Jackie hoax at UVa was at least plausible and took some investigate work to prove as BS. This one was clearly a fraud from the very beginning.

Amazing how many people were desperate to be fooled.

Actually the Jackie hoax was really not plausible. I was the second poster on DCUM to express doubt over her story and the other poster and I were relentlessly attacked for it.

Yeah. I was one of the early posters to notice the red flags in that story and was repeatedly called a misogynist and worse, despite the fact that I’m a lifelong feminist.

People hold on so tight to these victimhood narratives; they don’t want to let facts get in the way.

You are a terrible person and even seem to take some perverse pride in it. You realize that YOU are the reason why it’s difficult for many real rape victims to come forward. GTH.

If you are not the police investigating the crime then STFU.

I wish you understood how badly these tragic hoaxes hurt real victims (in addition to needlessly fomenting nationwide division). They cause unimaginable amounts of harm.

Good thing they are so infrequent.

If you are not the police, STFU and keep your opinions/doubts to yourself.

People speaking the truth aren’t going to shut up just because reality happens to conflict with your worldview. The sooner you internalize that lesson, the better off you’ll be.

But you don’t know “the truth”. You are just speculating for sport.

Stop intimidating victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one seems to have critical thinking skills anymore. People react before they think. No analysis of sources, no patience to wait for the facts to be revealed. Just emotional reactions.

Exactly. Wait for the facts from the police.

Until then, STFU with your hurtful, harmful speculations.