You are very wrong. The victim has legal standing to accuse her of slander because she defamed him by calling in a clearly false police report accusing him of threatening and attacking both her and her dog when he did nothing of the kind. If she tries to sue them, she'll be countersued. She would lose both suits because she was in the wrong and he was not. And dox'ing is not illegal. She was in a public place and videotaping her was legal. And anyone identifying her was also legally allowed to identify her. When you are in public and do something wrong, you can clearly be publicly identified. Just losing her job may not be the end of the road for her. She will probably also lose her dog for good and there is some question about whether she will be charged with misdemeanor making a false police report. That carries up to $1000 fine and up to 1 year in prison. She needs to treat lightly here or things could get worse for her. |
| Birdwatcher said this morning he could forgive her. |
She made false claims on a 911 call KNOWING that there was a camera running. I wouldn't be surprised if some of that lying energy came out at work in various ways as well. Probably plenty of people glad to see her go. |
She set herself up by walking her dog illegally of leash in the Ramble. All she had to do was move to the thousands of acres of Central Park where off-leash is okay, or leash her dog. Instead, she pulled the entitlement card, and it backfired, bigly. The dog was bothering him. He was birding. Dogs off leash can kill ground based birds as are common in the Ramble. that is why is it a leash-only area. In other words, you are willing to give a pass to a white woman breaking the law and immediately ascribe the negative externality to the black guy. You might want to do some soul searching. |
|
| You'd think people would learn by now they should behave BETTER once they're being filmed, but nope. Glad she lost her job. At least she didn't succeed in getting a middle-aged birdwatcher arrested or killed, which was her intent. |
Let's think for one sec. If the dog was on a leash it would not have been a problem. And as for the rest of your post-- nope. |
Nobody set anybody up. This guy is a middle aged science editor who was out birdwatching. Bird people and dog people are always at odds - if she was walking a dog off leash in an area with a lot of bird watchers, she knew (or should have known) that she'd be called out by one of them. What seems unexpected to her is that the bird watcher was black. The treat thing is weird. And I'd sure as fck be upset if someone randomly gave my dog a treat. But I wouldn't call the police and say an African American man was threatening my life over it. And I sure as hll wouldn't let myself be filmed calling the cops on a guy in this situation, using that language, knowing what could happen out of it. |
He's a better person than I am. |
It's the free market at work |
|
Exactly! There’s plenty of a-hole dog owners who would have yelled at the bird-watcher or not leashed their dog (because they are jerks) without a racist false accusation that could have easily gotten this guy killed. |
My experience, too. I might take a photo surreptitiously and share it if necessary, but unless the dog was coming at me, I wouldn't engage. |
|
He's a board member of the New York chapter of the Audobon Society. He birdwatches regularly and has done so for years in the Ramble. He was trying to be responsible by asking her politely to leash her dog as required by law in that section of the park, or to take her dog to another part of the park where the leash law wasn't in effect. And she went nuts.
Hopefully this is a lesson to other irresponsible dog owners, but it probably won't be. Her irresponsibility and any acknowledgment of that will be completely overshadowed by her racism and bigotry that got her fired. |
There are a few people on this thread who carry treats. It's not weird and the only way a stranger could effectively give your dog a treat is if he was off leash. I don't think this applies to you. |