Anyone watching Mare of Easttown?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is no one focusing on the fact that they were kissing cousins? So gross. And he was a married cousin falling for his underage cousin. Barf. Ryan killed his second cousin.

They weren't kissing cousins, makes light of it being sexual abuse

He was in a position of power. It was abuse. Incest.

Strictly speaking, no, it was not incest. It was her dad's cousin. Legally she could marry her own first cousin and it not be incest. Her dad's cousin is a few relations further away from that. You're focused on the wrong thing.

He was an adult peer of her dad's who was married with kids.

It was raping your cousin’s kid. Wrong on many levels.

Yes, if she was under the age of consent - was she? I thought she was 17...
But anyway, it was wrong on many levels but it was not incest.

I'm from that area and was super close to my cousins growing up - we were basically siblings. They were also a very close family. I'd call it incest regardless of any technical definition.

It started two years ago. He raped his cousin's kid.

Then you'd be an idiot. Incest has an actual definition, not your definition or anyone else's. Like Sky or Ocean, you can't redefine them due to your preferences.

Whoa.. wow... I think thou dost protest too much. Is there something you would like to confess to this anonymous board. I mean sometimes people just need to get things off of their chests. NO judgment here.

Yes I'd like to confess I cannot tolerate fools. Fools who misuse and misunderstand language, mostly, but all fools generally, if pushed.

[Anonymous]

We are having a debate in our house: when Mare goes to Betty's house to talk to her about the reported prowler, she views the security camera footage on the ipad. She has a reaction to the footage, deletes it and tells Glen Carroll that the camera was not working. It was hard to see the person in the deleted footage, but they seemed to be wearing the sweater that Lori was always wearing. Or maybe it was Ryan. Maybe it was not either of them and this was apparent to everyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We are having a debate in our house: when Mare goes to Betty's house to talk to her about the reported prowler, she views the security camera footage on the ipad. She has a reaction to the footage, deletes it and tells Glen Carroll that the camera was not working. It was hard to see the person in the deleted footage, but they seemed to be wearing the sweater that Lori was always wearing. Or maybe it was Ryan. Maybe it was not either of them and this was apparent to everyone.

It was the neighbor teen Betty had beef with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
We are having a debate in our house: when Mare goes to Betty's house to talk to her about the reported prowler, she views the security camera footage on the ipad. She has a reaction to the footage, deletes it and tells Glen Carroll that the camera was not working. It was hard to see the person in the deleted footage, but they seemed to be wearing the sweater that Lori was always wearing. Or maybe it was Ryan. Maybe it was not either of them and this was apparent to everyone.



It was the neighbor teen Betty had beef with.


Thank you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We are having a debate in our house: when Mare goes to Betty's house to talk to her about the reported prowler, she views the security camera footage on the ipad. She has a reaction to the footage, deletes it and tells Glen Carroll that the camera was not working. It was hard to see the person in the deleted footage, but they seemed to be wearing the sweater that Lori was always wearing. Or maybe it was Ryan. Maybe it was not either of them and this was apparent to everyone.

It was the neighbor teen Betty had beef with.

Yes. Mare didn’t want the situation to escalate so deleted the footage.

[Anonymous]

Dylan chased Erins friend and threatened her in the parking lot - why? And that third friend in the group driving the car? What’s his deal?
Where WAS Dylan when the girlfriend saw he was out between 2-4am- he claims he was driving around but then told her to leave as if she knows too much? Maybe I can overlook this one but threatening the female friend and the three of them
First moving (when would this have possibly happened!! ) then destroying the journals? Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dylan chased Erins friend and threatened her in the parking lot - why? And that third friend in the group driving the car? What’s his deal?
Where WAS Dylan when the girlfriend saw he was out between 2-4am- he claims he was driving around but then told her to leave as if she knows too much? Maybe I can overlook this one but threatening the female friend and the three of them
First moving (when would this have possibly happened!! ) then destroying the journals? Nope.

Red Herrings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dylan chased Erins friend and threatened her in the parking lot - why? And that third friend in the group driving the car? What’s his deal?
Where WAS Dylan when the girlfriend saw he was out between 2-4am- he claims he was driving around but then told her to leave as if she knows too much? Maybe I can overlook this one but threatening the female friend and the three of them
First moving (when would this have possibly happened!! ) then destroying the journals? Nope.

He didn’t want rye cops to find them because he wanted dj to stay with his parents and the journals revealed the father. The friend helped because she thoughts what Erin would have wanted. He threatened the friend because she was having second thoughts about keeping secrets from police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why it’s somehow cool for Mare’s daughter to have sex with someone in college while she’s in high school and the woman in college is seen as a positive character? Have you ever seen a college aged young man portrayed as anything less than a creep for having sex with a high school aged girl?

What a bizarre thing to latch on to. Shows us where your priorities are. I think you forget about the age of consent. In many situations it’s lower than 18.

I’m pretty sure Siobhan is 18 already. She’s a senior and has already turned in her applications to college.

I thought making her gay with the black girl was purely PC. Just an add on for diversity sake.

[Anonymous]

I lived in PA for a year after grad school. Seemed pretty accurate to me. Also had a recent suicide — devastating — so Mares blank look and very bad hair seemed accurate to me. So many plot twists though. Definitely better to binge this show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why it’s somehow cool for Mare’s daughter to have sex with someone in college while she’s in high school and the woman in college is seen as a positive character? Have you ever seen a college aged young man portrayed as anything less than a creep for having sex with a high school aged girl?

What a bizarre thing to latch on to. Shows us where your priorities are. I think you forget about the age of consent. In many situations it’s lower than 18.

I’m pretty sure Siobhan is 18 already. She’s a senior and has already turned in her applications to college.

I thought making her gay with the black girl was purely PC. Just an add on for diversity sake.

It all shows that she doesn't belong in Easttown. All the other girls her age are pregnant, doing drugs, turning tricks, screaming at priests or beating the shit out of each other. Easttown is a pit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why it’s somehow cool for Mare’s daughter to have sex with someone in college while she’s in high school and the woman in college is seen as a positive character? Have you ever seen a college aged young man portrayed as anything less than a creep for having sex with a high school aged girl?

What a bizarre thing to latch on to. Shows us where your priorities are. I think you forget about the age of consent. In many situations it’s lower than 18.

I’m pretty sure Siobhan is 18 already. She’s a senior and has already turned in her applications to college.

I thought making her gay with the black girl was purely PC. Just an add on for diversity sake.

Siobhan was already “gay with” a white girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is no one focusing on the fact that they were kissing cousins? So gross. And he was a married cousin falling for his underage cousin. Barf. Ryan killed his second cousin.

They weren't kissing cousins, makes light of it being sexual abuse

He was in a position of power. It was abuse. Incest.

Strictly speaking, no, it was not incest. It was her dad's cousin. Legally she could marry her own first cousin and it not be incest. Her dad's cousin is a few relations further away from that. You're focused on the wrong thing.

He was an adult peer of her dad's who was married with kids.

It was raping your cousin’s kid. Wrong on many levels.

Yes, if she was under the age of consent - was she? I thought she was 17...
But anyway, it was wrong on many levels but it was not incest.

I'm from that area and was super close to my cousins growing up - we were basically siblings. They were also a very close family. I'd call it incest regardless of any technical definition.

It started two years ago. He raped his cousin's kid.

Then you'd be an idiot. Incest has an actual definition, not your definition or anyone else's. Like Sky or Ocean, you can't redefine them due to your preferences.

Whoa.. wow... I think thou dost protest too much. Is there something you would like to confess to this anonymous board. I mean sometimes people just need to get things off of their chests. NO judgment here.

Yes I'd like to confess I cannot tolerate fools. Fools who misuse and misunderstand language, mostly, but all fools generally, if pushed.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/incest
incest
[ in-sest ]
noun
sexual intercourse between closely related persons.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/incest
Incest, sexual relations between persons who, because of the nature of their kin relationships, are prohibited by law or custom from intermarrying.

They were "closely related persons" and it's taboo in our culture for them to marry. Hint: if the person

The only one misunderstanding language here is you.

The big question is why are you so irrationally defensive about the word "incest". Did you marry your cousin's teen?

[Anonymous]

^ Hint: if the person is at your small family reunion, you shouldn't F them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is no one focusing on the fact that they were kissing cousins? So gross. And he was a married cousin falling for his underage cousin. Barf. Ryan killed his second cousin.

They weren't kissing cousins, makes light of it being sexual abuse

He was in a position of power. It was abuse. Incest.

Strictly speaking, no, it was not incest. It was her dad's cousin. Legally she could marry her own first cousin and it not be incest. Her dad's cousin is a few relations further away from that. You're focused on the wrong thing.

He was an adult peer of her dad's who was married with kids.

It was raping your cousin’s kid. Wrong on many levels.

Yes, if she was under the age of consent - was she? I thought she was 17...
But anyway, it was wrong on many levels but it was not incest.

I'm from that area and was super close to my cousins growing up - we were basically siblings. They were also a very close family. I'd call it incest regardless of any technical definition.

It started two years ago. He raped his cousin's kid.

Then you'd be an idiot. Incest has an actual definition, not your definition or anyone else's. Like Sky or Ocean, you can't redefine them due to your preferences.

Whoa.. wow... I think thou dost protest too much. Is there something you would like to confess to this anonymous board. I mean sometimes people just need to get things off of their chests. NO judgment here.

Yes I'd like to confess I cannot tolerate fools. Fools who misuse and misunderstand language, mostly, but all fools generally, if pushed.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/incest
incest
[ in-sest ]
noun
sexual intercourse between closely related persons.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/incest
Incest, sexual relations between persons who, because of the nature of their kin relationships, are prohibited by law or custom from intermarrying.

They were "closely related persons" and it's taboo in our culture for them to marry. Hint: if the person

The only one misunderstanding language here is you.

The big question is why are you so irrationally defensive about the word "incest". Did you marry your cousin's teen?

Is it illegal to marry your cousin's daughter, your 2nd cousin. I'm pretty sure it is not. The definition talks about intermarrying. If it's ok to marry, then it's not exactly incest. It's pretty close and I would call it incestuous but they aren't forbidden to marry so it doesn't meet the definition.